Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod & Cue?

Rate this question


atlb685

Question

Hello all!

I am in the process of filing a NOD for my finace. He has been rated for Diabetes Insipidus (DI) secondary to a head injury he obtained in service. As I have been researching his disease, all the research has shown that DI presents itself almost immediately after the injury (within 3-5 weeks). He was in service for more than a year after the accident (which occurred in 2002) and the DI diagnosis was not awarded to him until 2008--when we requested that he be formally evaluated for it. He was not back-dated for it. Since the disease is directly related to the head trauma (by their own admission) and it would have presented itself within weeks of the accident, could this qualify as a CUE? I even have lab results from 6 months after the accident showing that he was clinically dehydrated, yet the military never followed up on this. He should have been diagnosed while he was in-service.

Is it appropriate for me to point all of this out in his NOD, or is there a completely different process that I have to go through? I don't want to put the cart in front of the horse if it is going to hurt him...

Thanks in advance for your help!

Jami

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Here is the TDIU form-

Check Yes to # 18 and then he should definitely apply for SSA

Under Remarks # 25, refer them to separate page and tell them anything at all that would warrant a TDIU rating-like side affects of his SC meds, the fact he must urinate often, and any other other information that would show his SC would render him unable to attain substantial employment.

If he is not working the VA should have sent this to him themselves.

Did he ever claim this same condition, and then get a denial that he failed to appeal?

Was the new decision based on a re-opened claim?

TDIU_form.pdf

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, I apologize, I am just now seeing this.

He is not currently working, and has not in several years. He has not formally requested TDIU. I have suggested that he do so, but I think he is nervous. He feels shame over his condition and so badly wants to be "normal". I think, in his mind, TDIU is "giving up". I don't know what to do. :-( He has not applied for SSA either.

He was granted service connection for the DI, and there were in-service medical notes showing clinical dehydration. This was some months after his head injury, so it makes sense. He would have been showing the symptoms of DI at that time.

He gets a total of 90%, though he is only rated at 20% for his DI.

I wish there was more I could do for him, but it sounds like we have no choice, other than to file unemployability. I wish he would do it, but he is only 32 and seems to have great anxiety whenever I mention this to him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, also, he never filed for this before. When he was discharged originally, he had only a 20% rating. I did not know him at the time. He basically holed up in a studio apartment for several years, letting his depression grow and grow. He did not associate with anyone, and mostly sat in bed all day every day. He moved to another city and worked for a short time (approx. 6 months) which is where I met him. The more time I spent with him, the more I realized something wasn't right. He had a hard time remembering things, and even had to call me several times for directions to his own house. And the constant urinating... It just seemed strange to me. So i encouraged him to go to the doctor (he hadn't been in years) and that is when he was finally diagnosed with the DI (in 2007) and it was so bad by that point that they found they can't even control it with medication.

So, once we got the DI diagnosis, we filed for an increase. They approved it the first go-round, but definitely low-balled us. The C&P examiner wrote over 7 pages about his DI and how debilitating it was. He was definitely on our side. But for whatever reason, they only gave him 20%, though we had evidence to support at least a 40% rating. It's all very frustrating to me, as i just don't understand how they can get away with this. Some people laugh it off and say "it's no big deal, he just pee's a lot" but it is SO much more than that... It's humiliating for him. Not to mention that he is constantly dehydrated. If he gets a simple stomach virus, he could die from dehydration quickly. What makes me the most upset is that if this had been caught before he was discharged, we could likely manage it with medication. But since it went on so long undiagnosed, his body won't even respond to the DDAVP, and he is taking 4 times the maximum dosage! I just wish I could look these people in the eyes and tell them that because of them, this man's spirit is practically dead.

Sorry for ranting... I just don't know what else to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure understand that-he is so young.

One of my husband's worse days was when SSA called him to say they were sending him an award letter.

That is when it began to set in that he knew he would never work again.But he still believed he would recover one day.

You can only guide this vet as best as you can. He has to decide what his next step is.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use