Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vision Loss Due To Diabetes

Rate this question


trailblazer

Question

I filed a claim for vision loss due to complications of DMII and high BP. This is part of what the evaluation says,quote A 70% evaluation is awarded for field concentric contraction in both eyes, end of quote. I was under the impression that a rating for vision loss was not to be combined with any other rating but stood on its own. I am almost sure I read that somewhere in 38cfr part 4 but I can't find it. I am going to need it if in fact exist to file an appeal. They combined the 70% with the 40% I already had and turned it into 80%(VA math sucks) Someone tell me if I am right or wrong in my thinking. I don't want tie up the va with an anppeal I can't win. To many other vets out there need help. Any help will be appreciated. thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks Berta and Clown Man for your help. Berta I will try to answer some of your questions. They didn't award me TDIU because I didn't ask for it the first time. I do have caratacts in both eyes and the caratac in the right eye can be removed but the left one cannot due to poor visual and healing prognosis. There is a hole in the macula in the left eye and nothing can be done about it. I can't see anything out of the top half of my left eye and mostly day and night out of the bottom half of my left eye and some images, but I can't make out waht they are. My peripherial vision is gone from my left eye. My right eye has 20/20 vision with corrective contact lens. I can't drive in heavey traffic because I can't judge distance because of lack of depth perception in left eye and loss of peripherial vision in left eye. I have become total dependent on my wife or kids for transportation to the Doctor and other places which creates a problem for them. I do drive about 2 miles a day to post office when traffic is light but that's all. I can't do any night driving.Here is what they decided:Service connection for bilateral diabetic retinopathy, hemiretinal vein occlusion left eye and bilateral cataracts associated with type II diabetes mellitus with kidney disease is granted with an evaluation of 0 percent effective October 12, 2006, an evaluation of 10 percent effective February 26, 2007 and an evaluation of 70 percent is assigned from September 29, 2007.Entitlement to automobile and adaptive equipment is established.An examination will be scheduled at a future date to evaluate the severity of your service connected Bilateral diabetic retinopathy, hemiretinal vein occlusion left eye and bilateral cataracts associated with type II diabetes mellitus with kidney disease.The also told me I could apply for TDIU. What do you think? Do I have a chance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA should have considered you for TDIU when you reached 70%. I think they committed clear and unmistakable error.

However I suggest you apply for TDIU ASAP!!!!!

The form is here at hadit-21-8940-

You could push for the Sept 2007 as EED on the TDIU-maybe even ask them to Cue themselves on that- but the main thing I feel you should do is apply for TDIU-

YESTERDAY!

If you get SSA for disability check Yes to Box # 10-if you dont get it- apply for SSA disability-

which ever award comes first can be used as evidence for the other claim.

I think the VA buggered this up- by not raising the TDIU issue themselves.

Under # 25 refer them to separate page with your name, address C file Number and tell them everything they need to know as to why your SCs prevent you from working.

List side affects of any SC meds too.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta. I don't qualify for disability social security becuase I retired from the civil service 3 years ago, however I am elgiable regular social security which I will get this november but it will be reduced due to my civil service. I have an EMG scheduled for April 30 and I want to get the results of that and maybe that will get me to 100% and TDIU at the same time. Thanks a bunch Berta and all the people on hadit for of your help. I hope everyone on hadit has a very happy Easter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are not working due to SC condition and the VA knew this they should have considered you for TDIU. When the VA discovers that a vet can't work due to a SC condition that should trigger a TDIU claim. I agree that the VA made a CUE if they knew you were not working and were 70%. Even if you were less than 70% if your SC condition kept you from working that should trigger a TDIU claim. This according to the VBM. The VBM says this may be a CUE. When did the VA know you could no longer work? That should be the date of your TDIU. It is an inferred claim for TDIU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John999 I did tell VA in 2007 that I had retired in 2006 due to not being able to the job. This info was mentioned in a c&p exam so the va knew or should have known that I couldn't work due to a service connected condition. I have a copy of the c&p as evidence. Do you think that will work? Let me know one way or the other. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use