Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

A Bothersome Trend

Rate this question


purple

Question

Many of you here who know me, know that I tend to say what I believe. Here's another one of those times....so if you think you aren't going to like it; stop reading now.

I see that several folks either claim or want to claim "medication side effects". Why not just tell your doc about the side effects and ask for a different med? You don't have to put up with side effects. I don't. Insist on a different med. It's your right to do that.

I just believe that filing claims for side effects of medications is not the intent of what the system was set up for.

{off soapbox now}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

In my opinion, a more bothersome trend would be Veteran's filing for comp 30-40 years after discharge.

Just my opinion since they had all that time to file.

Jay

Many of you here who know me, know that I tend to say what I believe. Here's another one of those times....so if you think you aren't going to like it; stop reading now.

I see that several folks either claim or want to claim "medication side effects". Why not just tell your doc about the side effects and ask for a different med? You don't have to put up with side effects. I don't. Insist on a different med. It's your right to do that.

I just believe that filing claims for side effects of medications is not the intent of what the system was set up for.

{off soapbox now}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I take pain meds that cause chronic constapation & side effects. This causes me to take yet another medication. Your not going to get away from it by changing to another pain medication.

They make me groggy after taking them. Same thing with depakote, meclazine & baclofin. They all make me sleepy & increase my vertigo/dizziness.

I've changed to everything else they have. This is what works but not without side effects.

When processing claims, why do you take it so personal, that vets are not entitled & shouldn't be wasting your time by clogging up the claims dept with it?

This is why there is such a high backlog of claims in my opinion. Raters making up their own laws as they learn how to process a claim. Lets cut this, lets cut that, & they don't need that. How about granting what their entitled to & get the claim moving along. That way there won't be remand after remand after remand for not considering secondary effects from medications in the first place.

How about federal subsidies & corporate welfare? Maybe we could cut some of that out instead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
In my opinion, a more bothersome trend would be Veteran's filing for comp 30-40 years after discharge.

Just my opinion since they had all that time to file.

Jay

Jay, ya know, some of us 60 year old vets are from the "old school" and some tough SOB's. And we learned to "suck it up" and keep on the hump, sometimes when it was step two steps forward and slide back five.

So, we've been "humpin it" for 30 or 40 years before our injurys become unbearable and we can no longer stand it.

You oughtta be damned proud to be in our company, besides, just think of all the money we saved ya!

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand and am sorry for that. I was just comparing Purples example with a different situation. That's all. I do feel you deserve it, just don't get Purples point regarding side effects.

No pun intended,

Jay

Jay, ya know, some of us 60 year old vets are from the "old school" and some tough SOB's. And we learned to "suck it up" and keep on the hump, sometimes when it was step two steps forward and slide back five.

So, we've been "humpin it" for 30 or 40 years before our injurys become unbearable and we can no longer stand it.

You oughtta be damned proud to be in our company, besides, just think of all the money we saved ya!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay, ya know, some of us 60 year old vets are from the "old school" and some tough SOB's. And we learned to "suck it up" and keep on the hump, sometimes when it was step two steps forward and slide back five.

So, we've been "humpin it" for 30 or 40 years before our injurys become unbearable and we can no longer stand it.

You oughtta be damned proud to be in our company, besides, just think of all the money we saved ya!

Larry J

Thanks for your post. You are right about us being tough SOB's and sucking it up for many years. Some of us filed VA claims many years ago only to be denied. We grinned and bear it and continued with our lives. 30 to 40 years ago there were very few programs to protect our well being , such as hearing protection and hearing conservation programs. Some veterans from those eras have hearing loss or tinnitus and have a hard time proving that they were caused by their military service occupations. We were exposed to toxic chemicals and maladies related to those exposures take many years to develop.

Some of us old vets did not have the good fortune of being told about filing for VA claims when we got out. Myself I did not found out that I could file a VA claim until many years after I got out. I did not wait to file. Times are different now and va claim info is available while in service and after discharge.

68mustang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I filed a claim in 1972 and got 10%. It took 30 years to get 70%, and two years to get IU. I got a CUE going back right to 1971 (my date of discharge) asking for IU, and my lawyer says I have a good chance. Anyway I can collect from those criminals who denied me years ago is a good thing, and may encourage others to fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use