Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Anyone Ever Heard Of Being Compensated For Impaired Fasting Glucose?

Rate this question


pilgrim01

Question

It is not Diabetes but just a higher level of glucose (I guess). No medication required. So, has anyone ever heard of someone being awarded this as a disability? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Pete said

"I have always thought that I could pursue it for a diabetes rating but why bother I am already 100%"

Since the 1969 readings Pete -I sure assume your glucose levels have been consistently normal.

I feel anyone who has pre diabetes should monitor themselves faithfully- I wish the VA would send every single veteran a free glucose monitor.

My husbands VA med recs showed what a VA endocrinologist called a "risk" for diabetes.

He received no treatement for diagnosis for diabetes even when these reading became abnormally high. A fingerstick test was ordered but never performed.

As you might recall Pete-my recent DIC award was the VA's

admissions of the true cause of his demise-diabetes-which untreated-and undiagnosed had caused his heart disease and strokes.The diagnosis of diabetes ever appeared once in his medical records.

Diabetes doesnt kill anyone- its complications do.

Every vet with a nexus to their service and who has been diagnosed with diabetes should claim it.

A local I helped with a diabetes claim developed significant heart disease and cataracts from the diabetes during the 10 years his claim was denied as he had not proven nexus.

When he did that and won his claim-his relief was overwhelming because he knew the Diabetes was the main factor that would probably cause his death due to diabetic cardiomyopathy-and his family would have a chance to attain DIC.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta

Amen and Amen...two problems with diabetes are denial and it's insidious nature--runaway high blood sugar is literally killing you, but with the execption of a few symptoms that can be passed off as the cost of aging, you feel fine. Until you don't, but by then a lot of damage has been done.

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order to get a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, one must have a Glucose Tolerance Test (GTT) done. This is done by having the patient come in fasting and having blood drawn. They are then given a high-sugar solution to drink, and blood is drawn every hour for the next three hours. If they have a blood glucose level above the norm for two out of three of the readings, then a diagnosis is given for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. If someone has an HgbA1C that is over 6.5, then a GTT should be ordered.

There are exceptions to the rule, among which is having an extremely high HgbA1C level; that is indicative of how high the processed sugars in your body have been over the past three months.

Berta is completely correct, when she says no one dies of Diabetes Mellitus, they die of the complications. Diabetes Mellitus is a disease that affects all of the body's major systems, to include skeletal. Early detection is key to effective treatment. Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic disease, meaning once you get it, you will have it for the rest of your life. However, even though it can not be cured, the progression of the disease can be slowed considerably with proper exercise and diet.

Sorry, but I worked with patients with Diabetes Mellitus for many years. I am getting off my soapbox now... :rolleyes:

Edited by Bonzai

"It is a terrible thing, when you lose your train of thought and you only have a one track mind"... Me

96C2P/96F2P (old MOS designations)

97E2P/37F2P (new MOS designations)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I was given no less than 5 GTT tests in 1969. The Military Docs were never satisfied with the results. Its almost like torture. One was given to me in the Hospital and I was not allowed to leave the bed during the exam.

Finally it was explained that my results were so extraordinary that they were not credible until they knew I did not do anything but take the exam.

I would load up extremely high the sugar would drop like a rock and than bounce high. The Doc said I would probably be a diabetic and to watch my weight.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use