Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ed And Va Rationing Of Meds

Rate this question


john999

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I told my primary I was having ED problems because of the depression drugs, narcotics and diabetes. She wrote a scrip for me but only two pills a month?????? What the hell is this? Is this normal? I have not filed for SC for the ED problem yet,but is two pills a month the normal perscription you get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

You obviously don't understand a male point of view. also, some of us would like to have families. sex isn't just recreational. I know a few people that are addicted to prescription pain killers, they have a couple beers and a couple vicodins and then drive. That is also dangerous and should be looked at. I also don't understand your point about std's. People with std's are frequently people that sleep with multiple partners. Its kind of difficult to sleep with many partners with 4 little blue pills a month. I just don't understand your logic. I need viagra and my wife would be very angry if i didn't use viagra. without it ,it causes marital problems which is also hard on everybody including children. VIAGRA is not a evil drug.

Edited by otey2171

ROD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see it as one of the MANY, MANY attempts this Administration (most of whom never served) trying to drive yet another wedge between veterans. Like because I was wounded in COMBAT with disabling residuals, I am a disabled vet....but the poor guy or girl in Iraq who has a little downtown and falls breaking their back playing a game of basketball trying to relax and unwind, then that person doesn't meet the same standards when it comes to rationing healthcare or compensation because there's not enough money to go around. It's their same twisted way of thinking that they never made any mistakes in going into Iraq. We need a change of LEADERS!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously don't understand a male point of view. also, some of us would like to have families. sex isn't just recreational. I know a few people that are addicted to prescription pain killers, they have a couple beers and a couple vicodins and then drive. That is also dangerous and should be looked at. I also don't understand your point about std's. People with std's are frequently people that sleep with multiple partners. Its kind of difficult to sleep with many partners with 4 little blue pills a month. I just don't understand your logic. I need viagra and my wife would be very angry if i didn't use viagra. without it ,it causes marital problems which is also hard on everybody including children. VIAGRA is not a evil drug.

How is you not being able to have a full erection hard on your children, I don't understand that at all?

Must be a male logic thing... :)

First of all I never said that Viagra was an evil drug, I said that the VA was giving it indiscriminately to EVIL PEOPLE, ie sexual predator that could harm your wife and children, and that it needed to stop doing that.

If your wife would leave you over sex, then you need to sit down and talk and maybe seek counseling because you have all of my sympathy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think that all sexual pedators need viagra. Sure there are some but the percentage that require viagra is probably small. I'm not a person that hasn't been effected. My mother was raped when I was 13 and my wife was raped when she was 14. That was long before viagra. Rapes are going to occure with or without viagra. Also, you don't understand that loosing the sexual part of a relationship is very stressfull. You SAY you love sex, but it sounds to me its not important. I look at the sex predators that have to register and I see mostly younger healthy looking men. A man does NOT need an erection to rape or molest their victoms. The people that are on anti-deppresants like myself need viagra. Can you imagine being depressed for what ever reason and then loosing yet another thing in your life. Having erectile dysfunction can cause a person to stop taking their anti-depressant medication causing all sorts of problems. suicide homicide. Stopping people from getting viagra is the wrong answer. You have your opinion and I have mine. My wife who was raped at 14 is a mental health nurse and agrees that viagra is not the problem.also should the va do back ground checks on the veterans it gives narcotic pain medications to make sure they haven't had drug problems.

Edited by otey2171

ROD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, getting angry about the VA prescribing ED meds to sex offenders is really just spreading propaganda that makes fixing the issue of rape impossible. Rape is not a SEXUAL act...it is either an emulation of a learned behavior (IE - the offender was molested as a child/teen) or it is an emulation of violent behavior (IE - kid was beaten and abused and feels an urge to act that violence out on others...or saw his/her father beat the mother regularly). My guess is that the ED meds are because the sexual predators have a hard time with NORMAL sex with their spouses and use the meds to "appear" normal....I bet not a single one uses it in the act of a crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have several meds that the VA is requiring pill splitting. I personally think that this is wrong. Some of these pills are designed not to be split. Veterans deserve better.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use