Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd Claim Many Years After Personal Trauma

Rate this question


68mustang

Question

Have any of you Vietnam Era vets filed for PTSD due to personal trauma incidents who now have PTSD symptoms many years later? By that I mean you did not report the incident or seek any medical care when it happened. And now the symptoms have showed up and you lacked a medical paper trail. How have you handled the lack of evidence that the incident took place and the lack of a medical paper trail? Thanks.

68mustang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

You should try and get buddy statements. I don't know how else to are going to connect the unreported and untreated incident 40 years later. You need either some record or some personal statements to show it happened in the military.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree w/John, however, sometimes after the incident job performance begins to fail. I had a guy who witnessed a parachute failure, causing a death, and immediately after the incident his, otherwise, stellar job performance went down the tubes. Additionally he got into fights and started drinking heavily. Ended up being discharged. This happens after MST, also. Statements from friends and family can help, if you told them then or shortly after.

I feel the VA's going to feel it's someone trying to get on the VA's gravy train, which is why they want witnesses. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See if your unit has a web site and maybe even a reunion roster and try to find and contact a buddy that way.

If this was a PTSD stressor they need to tell VA how their MOS and duties and unit (same as yours) put them at scene of whatever stressor you experienced as an eye witness account.

They should provide VA with full contact info as sometimes the VA calls the buddy up and be as detailed as possible.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See if your unit has a web site and maybe even a reunion roster and try to find and contact a buddy that way.

If this was a PTSD stressor they need to tell VA how their MOS and duties and unit (same as yours) put them at scene of whatever stressor you experienced as an eye witness account.

They should provide VA with full contact info as sometimes the VA calls the buddy up and be as detailed as possible.

Thank you all for the info and I will use it.

68mustang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mustang,

This specific information from a BVA case

addresses PTSD due to sexual assault

BUT

the information also relates to Personal Assault

(of any type) that occurs on active duty.

In studying it you will understand the many, additional

types of information and evidence VBA CAN use in claims

for PTSD due to personal assault.

This type of evidence is commonly referred to as "Alternative Evidence".

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

If PTSD is based on personal assault, as alleged in this

case, evidence from sources other than the Veteran's records

may corroborate the occurrence of the stressor. 38 C.F.R. §

3.304(f)(3). Examples of such evidence include, but are not

limited to: records from law enforcement authorities, mental

health counseling centers, hospitals or physicians; and

statements from family members, roommates, fellow service

members, or clergy. Id.

Evidence of behavior changes following the claimed assault is

one type of relevant evidence that may be found in the

mentioned sources. Examples of behavior changes that may

constitute credible evidence of the stressor include, but are

not limited to: a request for a transfer to another military

duty assignment; deterioration in work performance; substance

abuse; episodes of depression, panic attacks, or anxiety

without an identifiable cause; or unexplained economic or

social behavior changes. Id.

In Patton v. West, 12 Vet. App. 272, 277 (1999), the U.S.

Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) advised that the

portions of the VA Adjudication Procedure Manual M21-1, Part

III, paragraph 5.14c, provided "guidance on the types of

evidence that may serve as 'credible supporting evidence' for

establishing service connection of PTSD which allegedly was

precipitated by a personal assault during military service."

Manual M21-1 lists evidence that might indicate occurrence of

such a stressor, including lay statements describing episodes

of depression; panic attacks or anxiety but no identifiable

reasons for the episodes; visits to medical clinics without a

specific ailment; evidence of substance abuse; and increased

disregard for military or civilian authority. The Manual

also lists behaviors such as requests for change of MOS or

duty assignment, increased use or abuse of leave, changes in

performance and performance evaluations, increased use of

over-the-counter medications, unexplained economic or social

behavior changes, and breakup of a primary relationship as

possibly indicative of a personal assault, provided that such

changes occurred at the time of the incident. The Court has

also held that the provisions in M21-1, Part III, 5.14©,

which address PTSD claims based on personal assault, are

substantive rules which are the equivalent of VA regulations,

and are binding on VA. YR v. West, 11 Vet. App. 393, 398-99

(1998); Patton, 12 Vet. App. at 282.

VA will not deny a PTSD claim that is based on in-service

personal assault without first advising the claimant that

evidence from sources other than the Veteran's service

records or evidence of behavior changes may constitute

credible supporting evidence of the stressor and allowing her

the opportunity to furnish this type of evidence or advise VA

of potential sources of such evidence. 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f).

Edited by carlie
more information

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mustang,

This specific information from a BVA case

addresses PTSD due to sexual assault

BUT

the information also relates to Personal Assault

(of any type) that occurs on active duty.

In studying it you will understand the many, additional

types of information and evidence VBA CAN use in claims

for PTSD due to personal assault.

This type of evidence is commonly referred to as "Alternative Evidence".

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

If PTSD is based on personal assault, as alleged in this

case, evidence from sources other than the Veteran's records

may corroborate the occurrence of the stressor. 38 C.F.R. §

3.304(f)(3). Examples of such evidence include, but are not

limited to: records from law enforcement authorities, mental

health counseling centers, hospitals or physicians; and

statements from family members, roommates, fellow service

members, or clergy. Id.

Evidence of behavior changes following the claimed assault is

one type of relevant evidence that may be found in the

mentioned sources. Examples of behavior changes that may

constitute credible evidence of the stressor include, but are

not limited to: a request for a transfer to another military

duty assignment; deterioration in work performance; substance

abuse; episodes of depression, panic attacks, or anxiety

without an identifiable cause; or unexplained economic or

social behavior changes. Id.

In Patton v. West, 12 Vet. App. 272, 277 (1999), the U.S.

Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) advised that the

portions of the VA Adjudication Procedure Manual M21-1, Part

III, paragraph 5.14c, provided "guidance on the types of

evidence that may serve as 'credible supporting evidence' for

establishing service connection of PTSD which allegedly was

precipitated by a personal assault during military service."

Manual M21-1 lists evidence that might indicate occurrence of

such a stressor, including lay statements describing episodes

of depression; panic attacks or anxiety but no identifiable

reasons for the episodes; visits to medical clinics without a

specific ailment; evidence of substance abuse; and increased

disregard for military or civilian authority. The Manual

also lists behaviors such as requests for change of MOS or

duty assignment, increased use or abuse of leave, changes in

performance and performance evaluations, increased use of

over-the-counter medications, unexplained economic or social

behavior changes, and breakup of a primary relationship as

possibly indicative of a personal assault, provided that such

changes occurred at the time of the incident. The Court has

also held that the provisions in M21-1, Part III, 5.14©,

which address PTSD claims based on personal assault, are

substantive rules which are the equivalent of VA regulations,

and are binding on VA. YR v. West, 11 Vet. App. 393, 398-99

(1998); Patton, 12 Vet. App. at 282.

VA will not deny a PTSD claim that is based on in-service

personal assault without first advising the claimant that

evidence from sources other than the Veteran's service

records or evidence of behavior changes may constitute

credible supporting evidence of the stressor and allowing her

the opportunity to furnish this type of evidence or advise VA

of potential sources of such evidence. 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f).

Carlie

Thanks for the info.

68mustang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use