Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sf-95 Berta, Where To Submit Form?

Rate this question


Cruinthe

Question

I Berta and all. Here is my situation in a nutshell. Back in August of 2009 I was (inadvertently) informed that I am pre-diabetic. I requested and reviewed my medical records and sure enough, my A1C is 6.3, my glucose is 157, my triglycerides were 100 point over normal, and my Body Mass Index was flagged me as needing to be on the VA MOVE (diet and weight control) program.

It is now December, and my Primary Care Physician has not informed me in any way that anything is wrong. No warning letter, no consult with the Endo specialist, and I have seen my doctor since that time on multiple occasions.

I have also been complaining, often, of what I now know as Peripheral Neuropathy (tingling in arms and legs) for about 2 years now.

The last straw was my last visit to the VA eye doctor. I have a one year old prescription for eye glasses of 3+ and 4+, but this last eye exam changed my prescription to 4+ and 5+. A full diopter up for each eye! Whats next, diabetic blindness and amputation before someone at the VA says "Oh, by the way, you have diabetes"?

My question is, once I have my SF-95 put together, where do I send it? I listened to the SVR radio show where Edwin Crosby, Berta, and the Host talked about this, but I cant figure out where the SF-95 actually goes to.

I am asking for less that $100,000 so does it go to the VA Regional Office, ATTN: Legal Council?

Any advice would be great, and Merry Christmas to all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Robb Graham here is one of the best but ALWAYS busy- his site however has good info as to how these FTCA cases go-

http://www.vamalpractice.com/ perhaps he could recommend a lawyer in your locale of he cant help you-

If you put Veterans Administration Malpractice Lawyers into your browser many will pop up.

We often get a pop up ad here too for malpractice lawyers.

Malpractice always has a paper trail in the medical records.

I read my husband's medical records probably a hundred times- I am not kidding.

On the surface they appeared to be one thing, but after decifering all the symbols,tests results, etc and medical terms they turned into a prime facie case of negligence so bad that the VACO said the case was indefensible.(I couldnt get that documented omission until after I settled with them)

They also revealed how one VAMC covered up malpractice at another VAMC.

So if you were treated by more then one VAMC make sure you get every medical record they have on you.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will into that guy and those in my area. In your opinion, if I have months or perhaps a year of peripheral neuropathy reports, plus months of abnormal A1C glucose and other lab works, and an admission from a VA nurse that I have a potential diabetes problem, is this enough to prove negligence?

I have research my consistent A1C of 6.3 and have found people getting a dx for warfarin (?) for insulin control. Plus, as I said, I have kidney pain and vision problems plus other weird stuff like tinittus. It looks like negligence to me but I guess we will see after some lab work done by a real doctor.

Robb Graham here is one of the best but ALWAYS busy- his site however has good info as to how these FTCA cases go-

http://www.vamalpractice.com/ perhaps he could recommend a lawyer in your locale of he cant help you-

If you put Veterans Administration Malpractice Lawyers into your browser many will pop up.

We often get a pop up ad here too for malpractice lawyers.

Malpractice always has a paper trail in the medical records.

I read my husband's medical records probably a hundred times- I am not kidding.

On the surface they appeared to be one thing, but after decifering all the symbols,tests results, etc and medical terms they turned into a prime facie case of negligence so bad that the VACO said the case was indefensible.(I couldnt get that documented omission until after I settled with them)

They also revealed how one VAMC covered up malpractice at another VAMC.

So if you were treated by more then one VAMC make sure you get every medical record they have on you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Negligence and/or malpractice must be found to have caused additional disability.

If the undiagnosed diabetes in your case directly caused PN (is that a formal diagnosis yet), or visual problems or kidney problems etc-that are documented as diagnosed and their disabling affect raises to a ratable level- that is malpractice/negligence.

It isnt so much what they did or didnt do-it is what they caused by doing or not doing it.

Johniir here presents a case of what I feel is definitely malpractice.

There is such a strong association in the standard medical community between CAD and diabetes,that I dont see how the VA could

get out of his claim.

However as I said before- VA fights back as hard as they can on FTCA claims and Section 1151 claims.

FTCA requires a good lawyer and a strong medical opinion that covers all bases and even overcomes any potential landmines.

Not many here know better than I do what tactics the VA will use on these types of claims.

And it is the results that the malpractice or negligence causes - additional proven disability-that must be diagnosed and ratable to be actual malpractice or negligence.

I dont have enough info here to opine on your situation- as I dont see any additional fully diagnosed conditions yet-that could be directly attributed to the lack of proper diabetes treatment.

You could certainly have those conditions but like you said best to get a real doctor's opinion.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more thing. My testosterone is low, critically low, in the 300 range. I found this is also secondary to diabetes. Thus, we have erectile dysfunction. I have been getting testosterone injections from the VA for a year now. Yet more evidence the VA doctors didnt bother to add up. The more I think about this the more I get pissed off.

Negligence and/or malpractice must be found to have caused additional disability.

If the undiagnosed diabetes in your case directly caused PN (is that a formal diagnosis yet), or visual problems or kidney problems etc-that are documented as diagnosed and their disabling affect raises to a ratable level- that is malpractice/negligence.

It isnt so much what they did or didnt do-it is what they caused by doing or not doing it.

Johniir here presents a case of what I feel is definitely malpractice.

There is such a strong association in the standard medical community between CAD and diabetes,that I dont see how the VA could

get out of his claim.

However as I said before- VA fights back as hard as they can on FTCA claims and Section 1151 claims.

FTCA requires a good lawyer and a strong medical opinion that covers all bases and even overcomes any potential landmines.

Not many here know better than I do what tactics the VA will use on these types of claims.

And it is the results that the malpractice or negligence causes - additional proven disability-that must be diagnosed and ratable to be actual malpractice or negligence.

I dont have enough info here to opine on your situation- as I dont see any additional fully diagnosed conditions yet-that could be directly attributed to the lack of proper diabetes treatment.

You could certainly have those conditions but like you said best to get a real doctor's opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use