Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Incompetency Means No Firearms, Too?

Rate this question


Doc John

Question

Last week I got an award raising me from 30% to 70% for PTSD. Today a lady called and identified herself as a VA representative and said my claim is still "being processed". Then she said I cannot purchase or transport firearms since I am being determined incompetent, based on the C&P examination report. During the exam I had told the C&P doctor/examiner that my wife handles our finances. She's a financial planner, for pete's sake!

So the lady said, as was also stated in the award letter, that VA "proposed" to find me incompetent to handle my finances and I would need to designate a fiduciary.

I had already talked to my psychiatrist at VAMC and he is writing a letter to the effect that I am not incompetent. I already knew that :) .

What bugs me most is that the award letter, and the incompetency letter which was delivered at the same time, said nothing about my right to bear arms and now I get a phone call about it. AND my caller ID reads "unknown number".

What the heck is this woman doing, calling me on the phone? Shouldn't I be notified of this in writing? What effect does this have on a concealed carry permit?

Can I get a witness? Carlie, what is going on at Bay Pines?

Edited by Doc John

Platoon Corpsman, Hotel 2/4, Hotel 2/9, IIIMARDIV 1973-1974

Last Duty Station: OCS Medical Clinic, USMC Base, Quantico, VA 1990-1992.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

There is supposed to be a VERY STRONG PRESUMPTION of competency.

Yes, if you are rated impcompetent, you can't have firearms, per the Brady Bill I think. Surely we all agree that people who are incompetent are better off without firearms. (If they're sharp enough to properly handle a weapon, I don't see how they can be incompetent, do you?)

That said, incompetence is not being physically disabled, it's not being in need of aid and attendance due to neurological problems, and it isn't "I let my wife handle the finances." Show me a guy who DOESN'T pretty much let his wife handle the day to day business of paying bills!

A doctor has to say that you are not competent and sign his name to that statement. It sounds to me like a rater is overstepping their bounds slightly (but I don't have all the facts).

I am confident that your letters will get this straightened out.

*/ The comments and opinions expressed above are solely those of the commenter in their personal capacity and do not in any way represent the Department of Veterans Affairs. */

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got it right, Jim!

My American Legion rep said the same thing yesterday. His wife handles the money, too. How in the world does that add up to incompetence?

I agree wholeheartedly with the Brady bill, but right now I am wondering if VA is trying to cover itself after the December, 2009 ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court affirming a connection between PTSD, insanity and murder.

The case involved a veteran in Molalla, Oregon, who killed a neighbor after the veteran's wife said the neighbor had raped her [Porter v. McCollum (No. 08-10537. Nov. 30, 2009)].

I do not disagree with the VA stating that a PTSD patient who is dangerous to themselves or others should not purchase or transport weapons. I do disagree with a VA representative giving me an anonymous phone call and telling me in effect "oh, by the way, since you don't handle the check book, you can't buy or carry a weapon". It is the after-the-fact telephone message that doesn't make good sense.

And what about veterans who already own firearms and keep them in their houses? They could surely still do some serious damage under their own roof. And do they have to surrender their weapons to the VA now?

Of course in the end, your'e right; I will get this all straightened out with a letter from my attending shrink and this, too, shall pass.

Thanks for letting me air my laundry :)

The good news for me is VA is finally compensating me at the proper rate :D .

Doc

Platoon Corpsman, Hotel 2/4, Hotel 2/9, IIIMARDIV 1973-1974

Last Duty Station: OCS Medical Clinic, USMC Base, Quantico, VA 1990-1992.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being declared incompetent can have various meanings. In my opinion being declared incompetent to handle finances is NOT the same. It doesn't mean in any way you're a danger to the public.

If a doctor says your incompetent or insane as far as being a danger to the public then "yes" the law would pertain to you. You're not insane though, you just can't budget and balance your check book as far as the VA is concerned.

Jerr

There is supposed to be a VERY STRONG PRESUMPTION of competency.

Yes, if you are rated impcompetent, you can't have firearms, per the Brady Bill I think. Surely we all agree that people who are incompetent are better off without firearms. (If they're sharp enough to properly handle a weapon, I don't see how they can be incompetent, do you?)

That said, incompetence is not being physically disabled, it's not being in need of aid and attendance due to neurological problems, and it isn't "I let my wife handle the finances." Show me a guy who DOESN'T pretty much let his wife handle the day to day business of paying bills!

A doctor has to say that you are not competent and sign his name to that statement. It sounds to me like a rater is overstepping their bounds slightly (but I don't have all the facts).

I am confident that your letters will get this straightened out.

Edited by jerrbilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doc,

I think this VA is telling you BS.

Link to CCW Permit - Florida

http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/applicati...nstructions.pdf

QUESTION 12

If you have been adjudicated incompetent under Section 744.331,

Florida Statutes, or similar laws of any other state;

committed to a mental institution under Chapter 394, Florida Statutes,

or similar laws of any other state;

or adjudicated mentally

defective in any court,

you are not eligible for licensure unless you have received federal relief from disabilities

Link to Florida Statues

http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

During my initial MH screening, my VA doc asked if I had firearms. I said Yes. She recommended I keep them locked away and unloaded at all times. I asked what I am supposed to do when the criminal comes through my window? Should I ask him to postpone his criminal plans until I have a chance to unlock and load my firearm? She gave me a blank stare for a moment, because I was serious. I think the MH doc was incompetent.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Carlie!

The VA's jurisdiction is the VA program's. They don't determine your "competency" for matters which do not concern the VA. Most generally your state laws determine who can and cannot own weapons.

And being found "mentally defective" in a court does not just mean having a psych diagnosis - it means being found a danger to yourself or others, or incapable of managing your affairs or your person.

I guess my question to the VA might be if they are going so far to say that your disability is such that you should be found legally incompetent - why is your rating only 70%?

Free

Doc,

I think this VA is telling you BS.

Link to CCW Permit - Florida

http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/applicati...nstructions.pdf

QUESTION 12

If you have been adjudicated incompetent under Section 744.331,

Florida Statutes, or similar laws of any other state;

committed to a mental institution under Chapter 394, Florida Statutes,

or similar laws of any other state;

or adjudicated mentally

defective in any court,

you are not eligible for licensure unless you have received federal relief from disabilities

Link to Florida Statues

http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use