Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod On Eed

Rate this question


BoonDoc

Question

Hi all,

I am wondering about NOD's on EED.

I am 100% T&P ( recently got the decision ) going back to 2006, the date of most recent claim; 50% PTSD.

I had filed a claim for IU/TDIU with the same symptoms that the VA used in determining that I had PTSD back in 1996, but wasn't diagnosed with PTSD at the time, just exhibited all of the symptoms. I was denied any SC for any psych. problems for that claim in 1996.

Would it be possible / realistic to get my EED and award back to 1996?

My stressor was back in 1984, and I showed treatment of PTSD symptoms since the event.

My wife thinks I should let it go, but I think if I have a reasonable chance of getting the EED changed to the first date that I first filed a claim for the symptoms of PTSD, I should do it; I think she's afraid the VA might take away my benefits, and start back at where I was.

Any input and info on people who have filed a NOD on their effect date of SC compensation would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

BoonDoc

BoonDoc

Sailors see the World as 2/3rds full

"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I was confused by Bronco's statement too. I didn't respond because I thought maybe he worded it wrong so it came across wrong unintentionally.

There's nothing to lose by appealing EED.

I do see what Bronco was saying about veterans not appealing thinking the decision is final. I noticed on every one of my decisions the VA puts in there on the first page, "the decision below represents a grant of all benefits sought on appeal. The appeal is considered satisfied in full."

The way they word this contemplates that they don't want the Vet to appeal and I bet it works more times than not.

Jerr

Bronco

Anyone who was just awarded a claim and appeals the EED has no risk of reduction or loss. The reason is the award was just made

Please give some thought before you throw out a negative thought because of your experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Ok. Here is why I said this. Vets apply for benefits...wait for years, and then, sometimes get awarded the benefit they are seeking. They often constantly worry about a "reduction" in rating, and, someone pointed out then when ever raters eyes "look" at your C file, they also consider the possibility of a rating reduction. That is, kind of like the "dog in the bone" that sees the reflection of another bone in the water, and chases after it, loosing the bone he already has.

I am not willing to completely say there is NO POSSIBILITY that, if you apply for an EED, you COULD wind up with less benefits. That is, instead of getting more money for an EED, it is POSSIBLE that the VA looks at your file and says, "Gee, we rated this guy too high. Let's lower this rating right away, before it gets to a year and becomes final."

Altho I have never seen that happen, just because I havent seen it, does not mean it does not/ could not happen. I mean, I havent seen a murder either, but that does not mean they dont happen.

And, for many Veterans preserving the benefits they have is a higher priority than trying to get still more benefits.

That being said, I still think if the Veteran feels entitled to an EED he should file a NOD and try to get the EED BECAUSE, imho, applying for an EED will not Increase your chances of getting a rating reduction, but I think the VA wants us to beleive that it will, so we dont appeal. I hope I made it clearer this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Constantly thinking the VA is going to reduce your claim is being paranoid.

If you have the medical evidence then the VA cannot reduce your claim.

Paranoia can really bother a Vet especially when dealing with the VA.

If a Vet disagreses with an effective date then he should NOD the decision as the VARO too often makes mistakes on dates by misinterpeting the regs toward their favor until the Vet learns the regs.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bronco, I think that's a little far fetched. If this was true Vets wouldn't appeal any award in fear they might lose what they already have.

jerr

instead of getting more money for an EED, it is POSSIBLE that the VA looks at your file and says, "Gee, we rated this guy too high. Let's lower this rating right away, before it gets to a year and becomes final."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Basser is right. Vets are already often paranoid about the VA by the time they finally get their benefits. Chances are the VA has lost several parts of their file, at a minimum, delayed the claim for years, and, generally put the Vet through the ringer. I have even heard some Vets say they just aren't going to apply for an increase or EED just because it is not worth the hassel, and it is a BIG BIG hassel to get any type of VA benefits, as a Veteran must jump through all the VA hoops, and avoid the VA landmines before they get any benefits.

So the VA makes us paranoid..its all part of the plan. They want us to say, "Gee, I deserve more than 30%, but I could loose my 30% and then what would I do? So I will just skip the appeal." In this case, the VA counts the claim "correct" because it was not appealed.

"If in doubt, appeal"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use