Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Denied For Depression

Rate this question


12R3G

Question

My GAF is 65, I'm on 2 meds, and my GAF lists several SC condition in Axis III.

Isn't Axis III essenitally the co-morbid conditions affecting the depression? I was claiming depression secondary to existing SC conditions (OSA, DMII, hypertension, tinnitis, etc).

I'm going to file a NoD and ask VA psych/shrink to add note in record that depression is "at least/more likely..." secondary to SC conditions. Any other ideas for direction on this?

Thanks in advance

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

I will give my 2 cents worth. When bird hunting, novice bird hunters sometimes, when they see a flock of birds over head, shoot into the flock thinking they surely must hit one. That is a mistake. You need to take careful aim at ONE BIRD, not at a flock, as you will almost never hit one shooting into the flock.

Same way with yours. PICK YOUR EASIEST "BIRD" and take careful aim. In other words dont ask for depression secondary to OSA, DMII, hypertension, tinnitus etc. Instead, look up from other cases (BVA CAVC etc) where other Vets were succussfull at, say getting depression secondary to DMII, for example. If Vets have been successful at getting depression SC'd to OSA AND DMII, for example, you could try a "double barreled" shot, but I dont recommend throwing the kitchen sink at em. JMHO.

(Even if you "shoot into the overhead flock" and manage to hit one, then often it will be with only one or two bb's (Shotguns have "bb's" in them), and it wont be enough to "bring the bird down", but often wounds it and it may keep flying but then tragically die from its wounds, sometimes days or weeks later) Good hunters go to great effort not to just wound their animal and leave it to suffer a prolonged suffering, but rather take a "clean shot" and bring home the bacon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you want something secondary to another SC condition you should get a medical statement that explains the relationship between the SC condition and the secondary condition and makes a nexus. You should get something besides a note. You need a medical rational. If you are 100% already why bother getting the depression sc'ed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuck: I wish you luck to get a VA Dr. to make the statement that anything is as likely as not or more likely than not. Also, unless they give a nexus as to how one is related or caused by the SC condition or conditions, to give their statement weight, A C&P examiner can and would most likely give an opinion to Rebut any general statement without any support.

If you have the money, you would be better off with a IMO to support your claim.

Just remember to keep fighting the fight.

Rockhound Rider :)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Chuck

Rockbound is right. Getting a nexus statement from a VA doctor is hit or miss. They are not required to write reports regarding service connected conditions. However, some VA psychiatrists will write a note in the electronic record even though there is no requirement that they get involved in adjudication issues. If you do get a report from a VA psychiatrist it can be strong evidence. In cases where I have been able to get a VA clinician to write reports these reports were given weight and used win claims. If you cannot get a VA clinician to write the report then you will need to get a private doctor involved in your claim.

Axis III can involve conditions causing the depression or affecting the treatment of depression. There is no clear-cut way to connect the dots between something listed on axis III to the etiology of a secondary condition. Thus your plan to seek a nexus letter is the best way to deal with this problem. I have seen reports where the Axis I line says something to the effect “depression due to chronic back pain”.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the other hand, fishing with a grenade works great. ( see PT109 movie )

I will give my 2 cents worth. When bird hunting, novice bird hunters sometimes, when they see a flock of birds over head, shoot into the flock thinking they surely must hit one. That is a mistake. You need to take careful aim at ONE BIRD, not at a flock, as you will almost never hit one shooting into the flock.

Same way with yours. PICK YOUR EASIEST "BIRD" and take careful aim. In other words dont ask for depression secondary to OSA, DMII, hypertension, tinnitus etc. Instead, look up from other cases (BVA CAVC etc) where other Vets were succussfull at, say getting depression secondary to DMII, for example. If Vets have been successful at getting depression SC'd to OSA AND DMII, for example, you could try a "double barreled" shot, but I dont recommend throwing the kitchen sink at em. JMHO.

(Even if you "shoot into the overhead flock" and manage to hit one, then often it will be with only one or two bb's (Shotguns have "bb's" in them), and it wont be enough to "bring the bird down", but often wounds it and it may keep flying but then tragically die from its wounds, sometimes days or weeks later) Good hunters go to great effort not to just wound their animal and leave it to suffer a prolonged suffering, but rather take a "clean shot" and bring home the bacon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Hoppy! I should have remembered that about getting the Dr. or others to input such as you discribed.

I had taken a psych test and I was able to get a statement by the testing psychologist to input her opinion on what the results of the tests indicated. Knowing that I had a (TBI) Traumatic head injury while in the service and that tests at that time showed abnormal results and seeing that the C&P examiner at that time opinioned that I had a personality disorder, the personality disorder rather than being a developtmental disorder, it was due to my head injury or as she diagnosed it, "personality disorder due to a Brain Injury or rather a Organic personality disorder. Which means a personality disorder due to a mediical condition. Also it was noteworthy enough to list it as an AXIS I problem.

As a result of this, when I got to see a Neurologist, he defered his opinion to that of the Psychologist's opinion. The Neurologist also listed my headaches as Post Traumatic Headaches.

I also got my Psychologist to input her opinion, based on my records and her observation, the in her opinion I did not meet any of the criteria for a personality disorders listed in the DSM IV.

These are some of the types of entries I was able to get entered. Others would of course have to have them referance your depression and their opinion as to it's cause or relation to your SC conditions, espercially if you did not have any notes and/or opinions of depression while you were in the service and/or that the records reflect that the depression developed after and over time as a result of your SC condition or conditions.

It's late and I hope this information and what others have posted help you to better understand what you need to prove your claim.

If you still have doubts and/or questions, don't be shy in asking, their is never a dumb question where the VA is concerned, keep asking until you are comfortable with the answeres you are getting.

On a side note. If you are using the services of a SO/Service Officer, the same goes for them. If you feel they are not giving good advice, they probably are not. check their answers with what you get from here. It's better to be safe in knowing things are being done right and that your SO is doing right by you also.

Rockhound Rider :)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use