Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Denied. Dav Not Interested?

Rate this question


world_wide

Question

Okay claims for PTSD and Bi-Polar were denied, which is what I expected since it is the VA.

I claimed SC for the BP and they stated there is no SC. I was first diagnosed with the BP after 5 months out of active duty (AD). But, I was still in the guard. Still they said there is no evidence of the condition worsening when I went back on active duty and then went to Iraq.

PTSD, the VA agrees I do have PTSD but they say there is no connection to it being military related. I should point out here that I did submit evidence from my VA doctors, including the paperwork from the PTSD counseling, which states "PTSD due to service in Iraq." I also included orders for Combat Action Badge (CAB) during one particular bloody incident in June, 2005. The VA claimed they set me up with an appointment to see an outside doctor in April 2010. However I never received a letter or phone call or e-mail telling me of the appointment, naturally I missed it. Recently I was told this is incorrect as the VA psychiatrist/psychologist's assessment is sufficient evidence of PTSD.

I am now wondering what route to take. Before I began this claim by rep at the DAV told me he could not help me with my claim. He did tell me it took him 5 years to get his claim approved. He told me to seen the mobile van that goes around various locations. I did. I was then told that I should see the DAV rep at the local VA hospital. I told him my story, he shook his head and told me would represent me. Of course by this time my claim was already filed.

1. Should I now contact the DAV rep. at the hospital who wants to help me.

2. Should I contact a lawyer?

3. Should I also contact my congress man who is veteran friendly?

I do not know what step/s to take, so any suggestions would be great.

Thanks to all, Craig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

The first thing I would do is contact the VA hospital and make sure they have my current address and ask them if I had missed a C & P exam. You can try to see a county service officer to help you with your claims, even if you have to drive to another county they will try their best to help you.

Best Wishes and Hope This Helps

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete thanks, I shall do that. I shall ask specifically if I missed the C&P exam. I also should point out that I missed a PTSD exam(could not find the office in 2007) by a civilian psych in 2007. I know that ,and this latest appointment cannot look good. I am quite certain(but I will definitely check) that the VA hospital have my address as I have regular appointments there and receive regular letters from the clinic.

The first thing I would do is contact the VA hospital and make sure they have my current address and ask them if I had missed a C & P exam. You can try to see a county service officer to help you with your claims, even if you have to drive to another county they will try their best to help you.

Best Wishes and Hope This Helps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA recently changed the "rules" for service connection of PTSD. Per the new rules, you have the VA's doctors saying that you have service connected PTSD. (And they are the "sole" authority by the rules.) You could ask for reconsideration, submit a new claim, or appeal the original claim.

Which course of action to take as being the most likely to work out favorably is the real question. For want of a better method, I'd guess that filing a new claim under the new rules might produce quicker results. With an award in place, I'd then if necessary, request on appeal, an earlier effective date.

In theory, you can do all three at the same time, although it's likely to cause utter confusion and delay on the part of the VA. It doesn't take much, as the VA has problems with straight forward, simple claims. Obviously the "new claim must include the VA's PTSD diagnosis and opinion that it's service connected to your Iraq service. A "good" lawyer can help, and a bad one hurt. As to the HBP,once PTSD is service connected, you may be able to get an opinion that it is related to PTSD. The VA likes to deny HBP any way it can, including a C&P "diagnosis that the HBP is "essential".

Okay claims for PTSD and Bi-Polar were denied, which is what I expected since it is the VA.

I claimed SC for the BP and they stated there is no SC. I was first diagnosed with the BP after 5 months out of active duty (AD). But, I was still in the guard. Still they said there is no evidence of the condition worsening when I went back on active duty and then went to Iraq.

PTSD, the VA agrees I do have PTSD but they say there is no connection to it being military related. I should point out here that I did submit evidence from my VA doctors, including the paperwork from the PTSD counseling, which states "PTSD due to service in Iraq." I also included orders for Combat Action Badge (CAB) during one particular bloody incident in June, 2005. The VA claimed they set me up with an appointment to see an outside doctor in April 2010. However I never received a letter or phone call or e-mail telling me of the appointment, naturally I missed it. Recently I was told this is incorrect as the VA psychiatrist/psychologist's assessment is sufficient evidence of PTSD.

I am now wondering what route to take. Before I began this claim by rep at the DAV told me he could not help me with my claim. He did tell me it took him 5 years to get his claim approved. He told me to seen the mobile van that goes around various locations. I did. I was then told that I should see the DAV rep at the local VA hospital. I told him my story, he shook his head and told me would represent me. Of course by this time my claim was already filed.

1. Should I now contact the DAV rep. at the hospital who wants to help me.

2. Should I contact a lawyer?

3. Should I also contact my congress man who is veteran friendly?

I do not know what step/s to take, so any suggestions would be great.

Thanks to all, Craig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

File a new claim for PTSD. Under the new rules a review of you medical records should be enough. However, I would also have my Dr. write a nexus letter. Since we have no denial under the new system we'll have to give them a change before we make judgement. Remember the new system is for combat PTSD. Once it is approved address an earlier effective date. Good Luck!

Edited by sharon

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

File one new claim for your PTSD. I feel the new regulations in place for PTSD and the fact that your service was in Iraq, would be a blessing to your claim. The VA may have done you a favor. Then, as Chuck suggests, you can file for an Earlier Effective Date, AFTER you succeed in your PTSD claim.

If I could read your denial for the Bi-polar I could maybe give you a few suggestions.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

These new rules for PTSD really put a fly in the ointment. Are we really sure that only the VA can have the last say on a PTSD DX? As Larry was saying this puts the kabosh on IME's and IMO's to try and rebutt VA denials of PTSD. You can be loaded down with CIB's and three PH's and a Silver Star and the VA can still deny the PTSD DX. Many of us here would not have 100% or IU without IMO or IME evidence. I did not get my IU based on PTSD, but I sure needed private medical opinions and evidence for other MH conditions that were SC'ed. Where do you go for new evidence if the VA says you don't have PTSD? I did use a Vet Center and they did write a letter for me saying chronic and severe PTSD. I don't think the VA even read the letter. I was trying for an increase and it was all due to three IME's I got that rebutted three partial denials that ended with IU P&T. The largest number of claims for MH conditions is for PTSD and probably the largest number of claims are MH claims now. The VA has really put one over on the vet community maybe due to best intentions from Obama, but it could be a nightmare. Do you think Obama actually knew that this would be the outcome to make it harder for vets to get PTSD DX? I am not being political. I am thinking the political class does not want to pay for the results of these wars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use