Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What To Do When Va Selectively Ignores Evidence

Rate this question


acesup

Question

In reviewing my only-partially-successful claims from 1974 and 2000, I have noticed something that played a part in their denials at the time.

I was initially 0, then 10% SC for lumbar spine back in 1974, but VA disregarded claims of sciatica/leg pain, etc and also never mentioned to me that their examination had revealed evidence of a wedge compression fracture at S5-L1. They also did not mention that they found scoliosis at lumbar and thoracic levels. (Up until ablout 2003, VA considered lumbar and thoracic as two separate segments of the spine for disability purposes. They only had given me SC for lumbar spine, never mentioned any other segments.)

In 2000, when I filed for increase, I was raised to 40% for "chronic lumbar strain with DDD". There were other findings, and again I had claimed lower extremity nerve damage, but they ignored all of these things. They shot down my claim that my SC spine caused problems in my C-spine, neglecting to consider or even mention the T-spine problems that their own records show.

Now, in my recent C&P, the N.P. ignored the fact that I am claiming certain issues secondary to medications for my SC spine. My claim does specifically state that certain things (OSA, ED, DVT etc.) are caused by known side effects of the medications I take for pain management, including long term use of gabapentin, narcotics, and trigger point and facet block steroid injections. During the C&P exam, I specifically told her of the side effects I have experienced, and gave her a stack of FDA drug data sheets with known side effects highlighted.

So, in her report, does she mention the drugs? Not no but heck no! She says stupid stuff like "OSA is not caused by or secondary to his SC disability because there is no link between lumbar spine strain and OSA". You get the drift, it is pretty much the same for each condition.

On my spine C&P, she claims I have these huge ROM readings without pain (Her numbers she reports would make a young ballerina envious of me). She never mentions the MRI's (only a few months old) I brought that list moderate stenosis, spondyolisthesis, complete effacement of signal in places (in other words, crumbling). She rejects my C-spine claim, saying it can't be caused by L-spine, never mentioning the problems in the thoracic segment.

Now, here's the question: Should I wait until I'm rated or denied, then use this (ignoring evidence in their possession) as part of the basis for appeal? They can't just keep on ignoring the side effects of drugs that THEY give me, can they?

Edited by acesup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

In answer to your question, I think the Veteran can work all three sides:

1. Try to get all your evidence considered before the RO decision is made. You can send in a 21-4138 and point out evidence you think the RO may overlook. You can also send in an IRIS email, asking, "Did the RO consider my evidence dated June 24, 2010 where the doc stated, ".........".

2. If you received your decision, you can ask for a Motion for Reconsideration (which could be faster than an appeal) if you think your evidence was not considered.

3. Finally, if the other two methods are unsuccessful, you can appeal the effective date, alleging that the RO failed to consider your evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Sometimes the VA is like a 4 year old and has to be told something over and over before they "get it". Remember, when you learned the alphabet, you probably had to repeat it several times before you "got it".

1. You tell the VA to not ignore your evidence.

2. After they ignore it anyway, you file a MFR reminding them they ignored your evidence.

3. After they ignore it again, you ask a judge to remind them in appealate review, that the VA is not free to ignore evidence.

Welcome to the VA hampster wheel..here you run for a while as I have been running on this hampster wheel and Im tired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Broncovet, for you my friend:

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey J, at least give this little furry guy some credit, at least when he fell off the wheel, he jumped right back on. The VA would have just laid down and panted "screw the Vet, I get to him later :rolleyes:

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Acesup,

I think you got one of the worst C&P doctors ever. I hope everything works out for you.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you submit material evidence in a claim and the VA neither lists it or discusses it you may have the basis of a CUE if the evidence that is excluded would have had a significant affect on the outcome of the rating decision. This is where it gets tricky. "Reasonable mind" (meaning the VA) have to come to the conclusion that your excluded evidence was really essential to the rating decision one way or the other. I, myself, am in this boat right now with my CUE. In your case I would wait until I get the decision and appeal it on the basis that they did not consider your evidence. Cue's have to be on final and unappealed decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use