Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd Exam?

Rate this question


doogie

Question

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

HI,

Please remember I am not a service officer, just giving you my opinion of what I read.

Please forgive me if I missed something, but I think the report is very favorable to you.

Seems pretty clear cut to me.

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doogie, First of all please look at the 2 pages you posted for possible personal information/like a name at the bottom of the pages of the left side. It is preferred one not have personal info. just the exam info. Secondly you have the diagnosis which is a plus. As far as how one rates the exam depends on the rater/region maybe even their case load that day etc. It is not a blanket shoe in for what one would think.

The GAF is a component used and I have seen in my region, vets get an average of 10-30% range with the one you posted, but with the other factors of the exam included. This is just my opinion of what I have seen/read it is by no means the norm at all. One can really not say what % one may receive except for the VARO rater evaluating your claim. I am a vet and do not claim to be anything more.

Remember if you feel the % was lower for your symptoms/continuing problems you can always appeal it. First lets get to the evaluation and determination of a grant and winning a % before we might get ahead.

Good luck to you on this journey, and are you using a VSO(veterans service officer)? Who is helping you with your claim? Also it is important to remember the VARO works by their time line, not ours. You may receive correspondence in a few weeks to months, or could be a year or longer. BE timely when sending your responses back to them.

The most important thing is to never give up and always have valid evidence to challenge with. :smile:

Edited by halos2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

doogie, First of all please look at the 2 pages you posted for possible personal information/like a name at the bottom of the pages of the left side. It is preferred one not have personal info. just the exam info. Secondly you have the diagnosis which is a plus. As far as how one rates the exam depends on the rater/region maybe even their case load that day etc. It is not a blanket shoe in for what one would think.

The GAF is a component used and I have seen in my region, vets get an average of 10-30% range with the one you posted, but with the other factors of the exam included. This is just my opinion of what I have seen/read it is by no means the norm at all. One can really not say what % one may receive except for the VARO rater evaluating your claim. I am a vet and do not claim to be anything more.

Remember if you feel the % was lower for your symptoms/continuing problems you can always appeal it. First lets get to the evaluation and determination of a grant and winning a % before we might get ahead.

Good luck to you on this journey, and are you using a VSO(veterans service officer)? Who is helping you with your claim? Also it is important to remember the VARO works by their time line, not ours. You may receive correspondence in a few weeks to months, or could be a year or longer. BE timely when sending your responses back to them.

The most important thing is to never give up and always have valid evidence to challenge with. :smile:

YES I DO NOW HAVE A VSO TO HELP ME FROM NOW ON.

THERE IS ALOT MORE ON THE EAXM

I SENDTHEM ALL INFO WITHIN DAYS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YES I DO NOW HAVE A VSO TO HELP ME FROM NOW ON.

THERE IS ALOT MORE ON THE EAXM

I SENDTHEM ALL INFO WITHIN DAYS

I DON'T KNOW HOW TO EDIT OR DELETE FORUM IS THAT POSSIBLE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there is more to this it would help if we could read the whole thing.

There are some troublesome areas in this opinion.

The examiner is applying the new PTSD rules to this claim.

It seems he/she questioned how the "incident" was not related to fear of hostile activity etc etc---

Can you prove your stressor?

Sometimes I wonder how many combat Vietnam vets would be able to succeed under the new rules.

What might be a stressor for some of them was just part of the regular combat for others.

PTSD stressors can be highly personal reactions due to numerous causes-and I hardly ever have seen in the past-any Nam vet focus on the fear factor of combat because that was a given.

If there is more please let us know-

I got the impression the PTSD diagnosis was there but not due to a service 'incident' you claimed.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use