Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Smc Housebound For Ptsd Denied

Rate this question


MikeS

Question

Hi all:

Rating increased from 70% TDIU for PTSD to 100% scheduler for PTSD with Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia and Depressive Disorder.

Housebound denied.

Housebound was denied because I keep my VAOC appointments. I thought my VAOC appointments do not go against my claim for Housebound.

Housebound was denied because I try to go with my wife to a grocery store once a month. The C&P examiner wrote that I do go to the grocery store once a month but what I told him was that I "try" to go with my wife, "not alone".

Housebound was denied because a recent Progress Note from my VA PTSD Doc said that I go to a gym. What my PTSD VA Doc really wrote was that I tried to go to the gym but I could not stay because I paniced. My VA PTSD Doc failed to put in that note that that was 2 years ago.

You guys might want to know that my Housebound C&P was done by a CRNP. She told me that she had no idea how to explain that a vet with PTSD can be Housebound, so she told me that she just would "cut & paste" my VA PTSD Doc's Progress Notes because she said that he explained my situation better that she ever could. Still, she answered the question: "Can veteran travel beyond current domicile?" as YES.

I only have 60 days from March 27th to appeal the Housebound denial because I signed up for the ECA Initiative.

Any guidance would be appreciated.

P.S. Even though I applied "only" for Housebound, my entire file was reviewed including all Nexus information.

Thanks,

MikeS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

This 2010 BVA decision references Hartness-did they VA reference Hartness in the denial?

“With regard to housebound status, the threshold statutory

requirement is that the Veteran must have a single permanent

disability rated at 100 percent. In this regard, the Veteran

currently meets this requirement by way of his service-connected

schizophrenia. Still, he does not have additional service-

connected disability or disabilities independently ratable at 60

percent or more. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114(s); 38 C.F.R. § 3.350(i).

However, with regard to being "permanently housebound," it is

also clear from the record that the Veteran has been unemployed

for many years due to his service-connected disabilities, and is

"substantially confined" to his home in terms of not being able

to leave for the purpose of earning a living, thus meeting the

standard under Hartness, 20 Vet. App. at 222. In this respect,

the Veteran has not worked due to his service-connected

schizophrenia since 1965. While no examination has indicated

that the Veteran is bedridden or confined to his house it is

apparent that his ability to leave the house to earn income is

precluded by his service-connected disabilities. After

considering the Veteran's age, disabilities and ability to leave

his house, the Board finds that entitlement to housebound

benefits by reason of his service-connected disabilities would

normally be warranted in the present case. 38 U.S.C.A. §

1114(s); 38 C.F.R. § 3.350(i).

Notwithstanding the above, in view of the Board's grant of

special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid

and attendance herein, the issue of entitlement to special

monthly compensation on account of being housebound is moot. In

this regard, a Veteran may either receive special monthly

compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance or

by reason of being housebound, but may not receive both

simultaneously. That is, regular aid and attendance is the

greater monetary award. Compare 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114(l) with 38

U.S.C.A. §1114(s). Therefore, the question concerning whether

the Veteran is housebound for special monthly compensation

purposes is a moot point.”

ORDER

Special monthly compensation by reason of being in need of aid

and attendance of another person is granted, subject to the laws

and regulations governing the award of monetary benefits.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/files4/1032308.txt

(the claim is on remand due a FTCA settlement and Sec 1151 ending)

The BVA in their narrative however reiterates the Hartness decision adding this point.

(substantially confined means the inability

to leave the house except in instances of seeking medical

treatment)."

I feel this evidence can combat that :

"The rating decision ignored a vital part of my Statement in Support of Claim.

I wrote that I had moved to within 1 mile of the VAOPC so that I could more easily make my appointments.

I wrote that I bought a small old house as close to the VAOPC as I could find.

I also wrote that the move put my wife and I into debt and added more monthly costs because we moved from an apartment where we paid no taxes, no water, no sewage, and we did not have to pay for anything that broke."

You are right -this is a vital part of your claim and this is why they ignored it.This should definitely be pointed out in any response or rebuttal you make to the SOC.

I have friend with agoraphobia who cannot even drive anymore due to it.If this is a factor for you too make sure the VA knows it.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This 2010 BVA decision references Hartness-did they VA reference Hartness in the denial?

“With regard to housebound status, the threshold statutory

requirement is that the Veteran must have a single permanent

disability rated at 100 percent. In this regard, the Veteran

currently meets this requirement by way of his service-connected

schizophrenia. Still, he does not have additional service-

connected disability or disabilities independently ratable at 60

percent or more. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114(s); 38 C.F.R. § 3.350(i).

However, with regard to being "permanently housebound," it is

also clear from the record that the Veteran has been unemployed

for many years due to his service-connected disabilities, and is

"substantially confined" to his home in terms of not being able

to leave for the purpose of earning a living, thus meeting the

standard under Hartness, 20 Vet. App. at 222. In this respect,

the Veteran has not worked due to his service-connected

schizophrenia since 1965. While no examination has indicated

that the Veteran is bedridden or confined to his house it is

apparent that his ability to leave the house to earn income is

precluded by his service-connected disabilities. After

considering the Veteran's age, disabilities and ability to leave

his house, the Board finds that entitlement to housebound

benefits by reason of his service-connected disabilities would

normally be warranted in the present case. 38 U.S.C.A. §

1114(s); 38 C.F.R. § 3.350(i).

Notwithstanding the above, in view of the Board's grant of

special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid

and attendance herein, the issue of entitlement to special

monthly compensation on account of being housebound is moot. In

this regard, a Veteran may either receive special monthly

compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance or

by reason of being housebound, but may not receive both

simultaneously. That is, regular aid and attendance is the

greater monetary award. Compare 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114(l) with 38

U.S.C.A. §1114(s). Therefore, the question concerning whether

the Veteran is housebound for special monthly compensation

purposes is a moot point.”

ORDER

Special monthly compensation by reason of being in need of aid

and attendance of another person is granted, subject to the laws

and regulations governing the award of monetary benefits.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/files4/1032308.txt

(the claim is on remand due a FTCA settlement and Sec 1151 ending)

The BVA in their narrative however reiterates the Hartness decision adding this point.

(substantially confined means the inability

to leave the house except in instances of seeking medical

treatment)."

I feel this evidence can combat that :

"The rating decision ignored a vital part of my Statement in Support of Claim.

I wrote that I had moved to within 1 mile of the VAOPC so that I could more easily make my appointments.

I wrote that I bought a small old house as close to the VAOPC as I could find.

I also wrote that the move put my wife and I into debt and added more monthly costs because we moved from an apartment where we paid no taxes, no water, no sewage, and we did not have to pay for anything that broke."

You are right -this is a vital part of your claim and this is why they ignored it.This should definitely be pointed out in any response or rebuttal you make to the SOC.

I have friend with agoraphobia who cannot even drive anymore due to it.If this is a factor for you too make sure the VA knows it.

Berta:

No cases were referenced in their denial of Housebound.

Thanks,

Mike S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta:

The rules for Housebound as they would apply to PTSD are very vague to me.

Is it unusual for a veteran with PTSD to apply for SMC Housebound?

Besides "Hartness", are there any other cases that I could use in my NOD?

Thanks,

Mike S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If social phobia or agoraphobia is part of your PTSD then that should help you get HB. I think many PTSD vets are housebound to a great extent. I don't think it is unusual at all. If you have severe PTSD you may be afraid of many things outside your safe zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If social phobia or agoraphobia is part of your PTSD then that should help you get HB. I think many PTSD vets are housebound to a great extent. I don't think it is unusual at all. If you have severe PTSD you may be afraid of many things outside your safe zone.

It looks like there are as many "interpretations" of Housebound as there are ROs!

My God! Just think about the veterans (probably tens of thousands) who are not able to (try) to work their way through the VBA to get what is rightfully theirs like we all can (try)!

Thanks,

Mike S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Mike:

Look we have discussed a lot of stuff but it appears that the person who did your C&P was unqualified and unable to apply VA regulations and rules. Focus on getting her C&P dismissed is my advice. Best way is for a Doctor to take it apart.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use