Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Speeding Up Claims Processing

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Greetings all,

Here's an ingenious and very fiscally responsible idea to speed up and streamline the claims adjudication process! I am a veteran residing within the Waco VARO area. the approximate turnaround time for ptsd related claims (or IU claims like my current claim being adjudicated) isw 10 - 12 months. I am an OIF 1 & OIF 3 Veteran and have already been sc for ptsd 70%, tinnitus 10% & lumbrosacral strain 0% (need to file for an increase on that as I've just been confirmed to have a bulging disc recently). Over the last few weeks I've gathered from reading here on Hadit that the general consensus is that most, if not ALL, are [very] stretched thin on their patience with waiting for their claims to be finalized. I've read about all the attempted "streamlining" the VA is doing (laughable at best) to expedite their claim adjudication processes. Well, I know certain federal court cases have caused certain classes of claims to now take precedence over other classes of claims which is fine; I have a heart for all veterans and love to see advocating for any group therein. What bothers me to know is that Waco for sure (I personally know an adjudicator there WHOM IS NOT ALLOWED TO SEE OR HANDLE ANY OF MY PAPERWORK WHATSOEVER!) employs masters level college graduates at well over $40K per year to process, starting out at, 1 - 2 claims per day. they are expected to gradually succeed to completing 4-5 & more per day with their salary increasing accordingly. Now I think my friend who powered through college and earned her masters degree before she was 24 deserves that level of salary but I DO NOT think the VA should be filling it's claims offices with half as many adjudicators as they could based upon their manpower budget. Here's the ingenious and fiscally responsible idea -- gradually integrate bachelors level graduates into the seats of the masters level graduates but pay them a nominally smaller salary commensurate upon their education level. eventually the masters level adjudicators can be shown the door and the VA will have more than enough to hire twice as many claims processors and speed up the claims processing rate by 2 times. Maybe it IS too simple, but it seems like it would work to me. What do yall think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think that the VA should let Social Security work any claim that they can't finish in 4 months. I think that VA should pay Veterans after they wait 6 months at 100%

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Having a Bachellors or Masters degree is definitely a plus, but is not proof of competence or work ethic. We can only hope adjudicators will perform their work thoroughly and accurately. :biggrin:

Good ideas here. I think Pete is on to something with the pay @ 100% after six months.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read a comment on a Face Book post today by the VA Benefits Page ("VA Now Hiring") in which the veteran suggested the VAROs ought to dismiss all the current processors and fill the empty seats with nothing but starving, needy, broken veterans who know the pain and struggles of the veterans submitting all these claims. I think this is a wonderful idea but I foresee one problem -- the government will claim that veterans processing other veterans' claims is a biased thing and they would pass on that idea. Any input on this particular idea, guys? I'm all for it, but knowing the way the top of the VA has worked in the past they could just reject ideas like these in an instant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the government will claim that veterans processing other veterans' claims is a biased thing and they would pass on that idea. Any input on this particular idea, guys?

Well, I hate to have to point it out but many of the decision makers employed by the VBA - - -

are already veterans.

In VA claims adjudication, there shouldn't be a need for a specific college level

of education. There is a need to know how to read and comprehend what is read,

then apply the regulations correctly.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The United States does just not rate veterans as high on priority list of "things to do". Look how they drag their feet on "Care givers" program just for the most severely disabled vet's spouses. I guess Vietnam Era vets just got by on their own for 4 decades. When you see that vets can't even agree on who their friends are in congress you know they will always be dead last. Nobody has a better claim on the nation's resources than disabled vets, but every Tom, Dick or Harry can get more because they are organized. The NRA has congress jumping through hoops for them and their are 25 million vets who have to beg for help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use