Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Decision Letter ?

Rate this question


desperatelyseekingsusan

Question

Thank you to all of you on this board. The support and information has been a great help through this process.

My husband received the decision letter today. Yay.

We don't understand this:

"Your overall or combined rating is 50% effective Aug 11, 2010, increased to 100% effective Nov 9,2010, then decreased to 60% July 1, 2011. We do not add the individual percentages of each condition to determine your combined rating. We use a combined rating table that considers the effect from the most serious to the least serious conditions." ..."We granted entitlement to special monthly compensation effective Nov 9, 2010 because of your loss of use of a creative organ [prostate cancer].

Medical Description: PTSD

Percent Assigned: 50%

Effective Date: Aug 11, 2010

Do we interpret this to mean there will be 50% compensation, in total? Period? The prostate cancer is ignored, or factored in somehow by the most serious to the least serious condition table?

It has us scratching our heads. Any comments would be appriciated.

Best wishes to all,

Susan

Edited by desperatelyseekingsusan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Did he have surgury on the prostate 11/09/2010.

If so then this is a temporary rating or convalesent. They rate the convalesent 100 percent for a period of time and reduce the rating based on residuals.

If this is not the case, list his service conencted percentages for each conditon.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree w/jbasser. It sounds like he had prostate surgery, was given a convalesent rate for that period and then reduced based on the residuals of the prostate cancer, after treatment/surgery. They then reduced him to just the 50% for PTSD and gave him an SMC "k" award, for ED.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the replies!

Yes, he had surgery for the prostate cancer. I get the 50% for PTSD and the temporary 100% during the surgery recovery phase. The part that still confuses me after thinking about it over night is the 60%. It's my understanding that the SMC-k compensation is separate from/in addition to the percentage of disability. Where does the 60% come from and what does it mean?

Also, he pretty much was going to lose his job due to issues related to the PTSD. He was granted disability retirement as a result of his difficulty at work. Do you think he should/can submit a claim for TDIU?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If he's not working he should absolutely apply for TDIU. The additional 10% or 20%, which would combine to 60%, could be for the residuals of the prostate cancer. I believe they can give a percentage, based on the residuals, in addition to the SMC "k" award.

pr

Thank you for the replies!

Yes, he had surgery for the prostate cancer. I get the 50% for PTSD and the temporary 100% during the surgery recovery phase. The part that still confuses me after thinking about it over night is the 60%. It's my understanding that the SMC-k compensation is separate from/in addition to the percentage of disability. Where does the 60% come from and what does it mean?

Also, he pretty much was going to lose his job due to issues related to the PTSD. He was granted disability retirement as a result of his difficulty at work. Do you think he should/can submit a claim for TDIU?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pr,

Thank you! you helped me remember a statement about residuals from the prostate surgery. I bet that accounts for the 60% figure. Thank you for clarifying that the SMC "K" is an additional benefit. My husband will be submitting a TDIU claim ASAP (so many acronyms to keep track of! )

Thanks for the help,

Susan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You should request the TDIU effective to the last day your husband worked.

Good Luck and be sure and apply for Social Security.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use