Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Resources (((Read This)))

Rate this question


Revelation

Question

I have been reading various claim information, questions and request for assistance. It was easy to see that I would have to be here all night to help each individual so I am sharing some very helpful information with you. This information comes from nearly 20 years of researching a case for a solider who was injured in Korea and most likely has one of the oldest and substantial claims on the books to date. I am not a Lawyer, just a daughter. There will be a lot of information here.

1. Invest in a Title 38 Law Book and read every page. If you are unable to afford it, see the Cornell Law website for the laws: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode38/usc_sup_01_38.html AND http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title38/38tab_02.tpl There is C.F.R (Code of Federal Regulations) and U.S.C (United States Code). Know both of them inside and out. Learn legal terms.

The following Laws pertain to veterans seeking benefits. The VA expects that you do not know these laws and that is how cases are drug out so long that veteran's die or give up. Even if you have a representative, do not believe that they know or will use these laws in support of your case.

2. If you are 70 or 75 years old or older, (there is a discrepancy in actual age ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT TEXT) your case has to handled in an "expedited" manner. http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:z7SWYTOrrJMJ:www.bva.va.gov/docs/VLR_VOL2/Copy2--MarcyKreindlerandSarahRichmond.pdf+veterans+law+expedited+age&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiI6EvhEDVoua-jGIrq2MGuOg3tqKpcipsbwoNTnCeXbzkd7q2W5p5J7F05CtEA1D-ZCeWsNovOWRbVsHJdzkhthy3TUy_xuge3CLEJF1CSJvS-JjqmB_OmJcdLgV2M9s2oMJE0&sig=AHIEtbTJWg75VF0apbs7YQzTfWrT0LGzmw

3. A REMANDED case has to be handled in an expedited manner as well. USC Title 38 7112

4. The Secretary has to share the burden of proof and has a Duty to Assist claimants in securing records related to their claim. Make sure you cite this law when making your request for assistance. If the request is ignored, you may have grounds for CUE's or Clear and Unmistakable Errors, which will be covered momentarily.

http://www.veteransdisabilitylawyersite.com/duty_to_assist.html

The VA Duty to Assist in Getting Records for a Veterans Disability Claim.

"The Secretary must make reasonable effort to assist claimant in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate the claimants claim for benefits under a law administered by the secretary." 38 U.S.C. 5103 A. The standard by which the VA must apply this is slightly different depending on whether the records sought are federal records or not.

For federal records the VA must make continued reasonable effort to try and obtain those records. The VA can stop pursuing the records only after they are reasonably sure the records the records don't exist or that a continue effort to get the records would be futile. 38 U.S.C. 5103 A (b)(3). Even if VA for the above reason stops attempting to get records they have an obligation to notify the claimant and inform the claimant of possible alternatives to those records.

5. USC Title 38 7111 ( TITLE 38 > PART V > CHAPTER 71 > § 7111)

Revision of decisions on grounds of clear and unmistakable error

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/38/7111.html

It is important to take the time to read this, especially if your case has been denied. This IS an important law.

6. Regarding injury sustained while in the Armed Forces of the United States: TITLE 38 > PART II > CHAPTER 11 > SUBCHAPTER VI > § 1154

Consideration to be accorded time, place, and circumstances of service

(a) The Secretary shall include in the regulations pertaining to service-connection of disabilities(1) additional provisions in effect requiring that in each case where a veteran is seeking service-connection for any disability due consideration shall be given to the places, types, and circumstances of such veteran’s service as shown by such veteran’s service record, the official history of each organization in which such veteran served, such veteran’s medical records, and all pertinent medical and lay evidence, and<a name="a_2">(2) the provisions required by section 5 of the Veterans’ Dioxin and Radiation Exposure Compensation Standards Act (Public Law 98–542; 98 Stat. 2727).Continue reading: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/display.html?terms=38%201154&url=/uscode/html/uscode38/usc_sec_38_00001154----000-.htmlAnd this information has a lot to do with Vietnam Veterans: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/display.html?terms=38%201154&url=/uscode/html/uscode38/usc_sec_38_00001154----000-notes.html

For those of you who have missing military records of any kind or have been told your records "burned up" in St. Louis...If you are a combat veteran and have a CIB or actually fought, you will be amazed to read this law. In the absence of evidence:(b) In the case of any veteran who engaged in combat with the enemy in active service with a military, naval, or air organization of the United States during a period of war, campaign, or expedition, the Secretary shall accept as sufficient proof of service-connection of any disease or injury alleged to have been incurred in or aggravated by such service satisfactory lay or other evidence of service incurrence or aggravation of such injury or disease, if consistent with the circumstances, conditions, or hardships of such service, notwithstanding the fact that there is no official record of such incurrence or aggravation in such service, and, to that end, shall resolve every reasonable doubt in favor of the veteran. Service-connection of such injury or disease may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary. The reasons for granting or denying service-connection in each case shall be recorded in full.

See the other laws below:

TITLE 38 > PART II > CHAPTER 15 > SUBCHAPTER II > Non-Service-Connected

§ 1521<h2 class=catchline" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-weight: normal; display: inline !important; "><h2 class="catchline" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-weight: normal; display: inline !important; ">. Veterans of a period of war

</h2></h2>

§ 106. Certain service deemed to be active service

§ 1111 Presumption of Sound Condition When you entered you had a physical exam which stated "SOUND CONDITION"

§ 11110 Basic Entitlement

§ 1112 Presumptions relating to certain diseases and disabilities

Thank you for all you have done and continue to do. I might be able to help medically to connect the injury sustained in the military to current problems on a case by case bases. I work full time, long shifts and will do what I can. Thank you ~Revelation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I wanted to add some information here. If an injury occurred which required hospitalization while in the military and the VA states there are no records, a way to prove absence from duty due to the injury is through your morning reports. Request your morning reports through the National Records Archive http://www.archives.gov/veterans/ , through the Secretary and his "Duty to Assist", or through your representative.

Many published Army Regulations can be found here: http://usmilitary.about.com/od/armyreg/Army_Regulations_and_Field_Manuals.htm Make sure that the regulations you are looking at fit your "time" of duty and that they have not been superseded by a change that does not apply to you.

Information about Army Policies for Separation: http://www.armywell-being.org/skins/wblo/display.aspx?ModuleID=77a35404-a7b5-4da5-829f-52f412d3328e&Action=display_user_category_objects&CategoryID=169499dd-24cf-46c0-b6f4-5dece3f6db46 Sometimes not following United States Armed Forces policies and procedures can cast fault on the part of the military or "reasonable doubt" in cases where policies plays a major roll in a claim.

Request your DD214a This is a "worksheet" which was prepared upon discharge and may contain pertinent information.

United States Military Publications and Regulations

http://usmilitary.about.com/od/publicationsregulations/United_States_Military_Publications_and_Regulations.htm It may prove worth your while to research regulations.

Information and resources about United States Military Publications, including official publications such as regulations and unofficial publications such as military-related magazines and newspapers. DOD Directives are shown below. Other service's regulations and manuals are in the sub-categories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Thank you, Revelation

There is information in your post I consider helpfull. For me, I am service connected, seeking an Earlier Effective date. Have you researched this? (EED)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Revelation

There is information in your post I consider helpfull. For me, I am service connected, seeking an Earlier Effective date. Have you researched this? (EED)

What the VA considers "effective date", is the date in which you first applied for a claim which you probably already knew. In the information previously posted regarding policy/procedure or army regulations which were not followed is the only way I know to get an earlier effective date. You have to place blame, beyond a reasonable doubt on the VA. For example, the best way to know if the VA followed all the rules is to go to various websites, especially those which tell regulations, policy and procedure: http://www.apd.army.mil/jw2/xmldemo/r135_175/cover.asp Army National Guard and Army Reserve Separation of Officers

It takes a lot of research and time to try to find the smallest hole. If you are a combat veteran and make a claim and there is no adverse evidence to rebutt your claim, the law states the evidence is in your favor (see previously posted). I am currently working on the retroactive pay and earlier effective date. If the answer is out there, I will find it and keep you in mind. Keep checking back at this post. As I find things, I will post them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Revelation

There is information in your post I consider helpfull. For me, I am service connected, seeking an Earlier Effective date. Have you researched this? (EED)

I would request that you write me privately regarding your disability so that I know if I run across a policy which may have affected you that may have been violated. If you were considered undeployable while in the military, then there may be grounds for retroactive pay. The DD214 has several copies and the first copy does not have the same information as the following copies as I saw in a Army Regulation. The regulation stated to give the first copy to the veteran, then to add certain information on the others which go to various sections. An example of a policy is the following: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/649007p.pdf

PROCEDURES

1. PERFORMANCE OF MEDICAL ASSESSMENTS. All DoD personnel serving in a

contingency deployment as defined in section 3 of the front matter of this Instruction must

undergo a medical assessment prior to deployment in accordance with subparagraph E4.A1.1.1.

of Reference (l). The mandatory portions of the assessment are:

a. Completion of DD Forms 2795, “Pre-Deployment Health Assessment,” and 2766, “Adult

Preventive and Chronic Care Flowsheet” (available on the Internet at

personnel, completed copies of both of these forms must be submitted to the Defense Medical

Surveillance System and included in DoD personnel deployment paperwork, and shall serve as

the deployment medical record. For Coast Guard personnel, the DD Form 2766 shall be placed

in the member’s health record, but all other procedures for Coast Guard personnel shall be as

described in this Instruction for DoD personnel.

b. Medical record review.

c. Current periodic health assessment (Service members only).

d. Physical exam within 1 year of deployment (DoD civilian employees only).

To be continued...sorry, I am at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use