Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Didn't Read Evidence. What Now?

Rate this question


Sergeant G

Question

I filed an appeal regarding my entitlement to an earlier effective date for my award of individual unemployability (IU) on March 1, 2011. Last Wednesday, I received a Statement of the Case (SOC), which confirmed the current effective date.

I’m mad as hell because the morons at the regional office ignored the document I submitted as my appeal. Even though they obviously received my appeal (since they responded with an SOC), they did not list the document under the evidence considered on the first page of the SOC. Also, when I visited the (Boston) regional office (RO) in July, I saw my appeal at the very top of my claim file, so there is no excuse for the author of the SOC to miss it. Like I said, morons.

Also, the SOC is essentially a restatement of the rating decision I appealed. The appeal I submitted was 16 pages and thoroughly detailed the reasons why the rating decision was incorrect; however, the SOC did not address a single one of the issues I raised.

Is there a way for me to compel the RO to read the evidence they ignored and have them issue a Supplemental Statement of the Case (SSOC)? I plan to file a Substantive Appeal within the next 60 days to perfect my appellate rights; however, I don’t think I should have to wait 2+ years for a BVA hearing merely because of someone’s laziness and incompetence at the RO level. Furthermore, according to the M21-1MR, an appeal cannot be certified for the BVA docket if it requires corrective action.

Any thoughts? Thanks!

Sergeant G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

Serg,

On the rating decision that granted IU -

exactly what was stated in the Reasons and Bases Section

in relation to the effective date adjudicated for IU ?

What supports your contention to warrant an earlier effective date for IU ?

What exactly does the SOC state to support the denial of an earlier effective date ?

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Original date of award? You filed in Mar1, 2011 for earlier date...16 page rebuttal / VARO person got lost in so many pages. Did you use a VSO? Watch your dates. Make sure you stay timely. You are lucky to get responses as soon as you do. Waiting since 03-09 and get what was originally requested and only granted from 09 to take it NOW or fight many more years, leaves a bad taste in one's mouth. Don't ever give up and remember valid info IMO/IME trumps all. Hang in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the VA had gone through my evidence I would not have had to wait all these years and force them to a DRO hearing... I produced hundreds of pounds of evdience they totally ignored, and had it put into evidence... It was not hidden, it was all in their records at the VA, they just refused to look at it... now they cannot ignore it, it's on transcripts, in records, on paper, in computer, on audio tape,,,, and it's all in my favor... it was outragous and disgusting vets have to go through this charade... they think by not reading it, it will stay hidden...

now they are dragging their feet before they actually give me my long overdue benefits,, but, at least the hearing shined a bright light on the truth...

a year has almost passed since the DRO hearing,,, just letting my life slip away while I await for them to get to the damned decisions...

Edited by retiredat44

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Twelve years later, the CAVC finally read evidence I submitted the VARO has completely ignored. Case was remanded back to the BVA in 2010, with instructions to actually read it this time or explain why they can't. My guess is I may recieve yet another SOC by the BVA in 2014.

Expect it to go back to the CAVC after that. Not convinced raters can read unless its to stall a claim.

Edited by allan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

(Is there a way for me to compel the RO to read the evidence they ignored and have them issue a Supplemental Statement of the Case (SSOC)? )

Yes! If you don't have an attorney working your case, hire one is my best advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use