Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Two Questions

Rate this question


andyxoxo

Question

Hi, not sure what section to post these two questions so here goes:

1) Anyone know if being rated by the VA as 100% schedular or TDIU satisfies the IRS requirement as being totally disabled in order to be able to make IRA withdrawals penalty free before age 59 1/2? Or would I have to be approved for SSDI as well?

2) Are VA retro payments based on year's past rates or the current year's rates? For example, in 2012 we get a 3.6% raise on our disability payments. But let's say my NOD is approved in 2012 and am thus owed a couple of years backpay on my new rating. Will those back payments be entirely based on the new 2012 rates (with the new 3.6% increase included) or a mixture of the previous years' rates with the current year's rate.

Thanks, ANdy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

At 100% TDIU I have withdrawn IRA money & not paid the 10%.

The pay is whatever you would have been paid in that year or years. You don't draw 2012 pay rate for 2007 period because it was awarded retro to 2007. Good try, think we can get the VA to approve?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Retro (back pay) is based upon the rates in effect during the time that the retro covers. (Minus any previous payments for the same periods.) IE This can occur when a rating increase is retroactive, or payment was made for a lower % condition that is separate from a retroactive 100% or TDIU rating. I.E. You were SC'd for DMII at the usual 20%. A retroactive award for another SC'd condition was granted, based upon a Nehmer review at 100%. The previously made payments for the 20% are deducted from the 100% retro due as a result of the Nehmer review's additional retroactive award.

As to income credits, etc. The forms to claim this require that you disclose VA payments and other nontaxable income. I'm against this in principal, and every time I bothered to fill out/use the forms, The result was that I could not claim the credit.

As to IRS rules

http://www.irs.gov/i...=168606,00.html

(Page leading to info, etc. for disabled taxpayers)

In any event, a doctors statement that you are disabled, and so forth, is covered in IRS publications and instructions.

(It would seem that you have several options to show the IRS that you are "P&T")

I don't know anything about your VA disability rating. SSA uses different rules than the VA. As a result, it's possible to be disabled by the VA and not disabled by SSA.

Or, SSA considers you to be totally disabled by the same conditions that the VA rates at lower percentages. This is where VA "TDIU" can come into play.

SSA can lump together conditions that the VA rates as unrelated co-existing conditions.

Hi, not sure what section to post these two questions so here goes:

1) Anyone know if being rated by the VA as 100% schedular or TDIU satisfies the IRS requirement as being totally disabled in order to be able to make IRA withdrawals penalty free before age 59 1/2? Or would I have to be approved for SSDI as well?

2) Are VA retro payments based on year's past rates or the current year's rates? For example, in 2012 we get a 3.6% raise on our disability payments. But let's say my NOD is approved in 2012 and am thus owed a couple of years backpay on my new rating. Will those back payments be entirely based on the new 2012 rates (with the new 3.6% increase included) or a mixture of the previous years' rates with the current year's rate.

Thanks, ANdy

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The rules are complicated when you are under 59-1/2. But, If you have a doctors brief signed statement of disability per the IRS Pubs, and you file it or have filed it in the past, The penalty is waived. But, the money from the IRA will be subject to tax. (unless it's a Roth IRA, which has the tax already paid.

These days, one of my tax related tasks is to calculate how much I can withdraw from an IRA each year without hitting income limits that would increase the income subject to tax, or the rate.

I'm still unhappy about the years that the VA delayed things, and I had to draw on capitol to survive. At least I was more fortunate than some.

I think the IRS rules on IRA withdrawals are sort of tricky. I think I would have a CPA look at it and get an expert opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use