Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

100% Schedular And A Tdiu Rating

Rate this question


Teac

Question

Reference General Counsel opinion 6-99 (revoked because of Bradley v peake)

It specifically stated that a request for TDIU from a veteran already rated 100% schedular would not be considered. It goes on to state that there would be no additonal compensation if a veteran held both a 100% rating and a TDIU rating.

It did not address a veteran who was awarded TDIU based on one disability and later was awarded a 100% schedular rating based on a different medical condition.

In my case I held TDIU due to a 60% back injury from May 1999 thru Jan 2007 when I was awarded 100% due to asthma/COPD. The TDIU rating for my back was severed.

Initially, in 2007 I was awarded Housebound due to a 100% rating and a seperate 60% rating. I submitted a NOD that indicated I felt per my doctor letter I should have been awarded A&A. In 2009 A&A was awarded back to Jan 2007. I was awarded A&A at L 1/2 due to a 100% rating and an additonal seperate 50% ( or greater rating). If I understand the SMC schedule correctly in my opinion if I held an additional seperate total rating I would be entitled to a higher level of SMC at the M rate.

Does anyone know of any rule or law in effect that specifically states one cannot hold TDIU under the curcumstances I outlined above. If so please point me to it... as I haven't been able to find it.

Also since General Counsel opinion 6-99 was written Jun 99, and my award for TDIU was dated May 99 shouldn't I have been awarded SMC S since I had an additonal seperate combined 60% + rating.

General Counsel opinion 2-94 dated Feb 2, 1994 which allowed SMC's to those with TDIU plus 60% was still in effect at the time of my may 1999 award.

Any opinions would be appreciated....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Ok, let me try one more time.

But to be sure you get the entire picture I am going to give you the entire background of my situtation and then I am going to once again present a situtation where I think TDIU and a 100% rating should be used for SMC purposes.

1. I was awarded TDIU in 1999 for a 60% Back injury

2. I was awarded 100% in 2007 for asthma/copd, the TDIU was terminated.

3. I was awarded A&A at the L rate in 2007 , however the rules state if a veteran has addition seperate disabilities that combine to 50% or 100% then the award for A&A is increased a half step for a combined 50 or one full step for a combined 100 ..... I was awarded A&A at SMC Step L 1/2. Because I have a seperate 60% rating for my back I was granted A&A at L 1/2.

Bradley v Peake states in part " The COVA held that section 1114(s) does not limit a service connected disability rated as total to only a schedular rating of 100%, it includes a disability that would support the grant of TDIU. ( in English- SMC can be awarded to those with TDIU)

In addition the court held that when a veteran has service connected conditons that combine to a 100% evaluation, if the veteran would be monetarily advantaged by having just one service connected condition that supports a total TDIU rating and the veteran has others service connected conditons when combined are at least 60%, the VA is obligated to rate the case to maximize the benefits that can be paid to the veteran. ( In other words--- A Veterans can have a 100% rating that does not support award of an SMC, however if that same veteran's conditons could support TDIu based on one condition and the veteran has a seperate 60% rating, the va will toss out the 100% award to maximize the veterans compensation) So based on Bradley v Peake TDIU must be considered for purposed of SMC even where a veteran is rated 100%.

Now comes the question.

1. Since TDIU can be used to support a Housebound award even when a veteran is rated 100%. then why can't TDIU be used to support an additonal step for an A&A rating.

2. The arguement I am trying to put forth is simple;

A. I am rated 100 for Lungs

B. I would be rated TDIU for 60% back injury if not for my 100% rating.

C. seperate combined 50% ratings requires a half step increase and 100% ratings require a step increase in A&A compenstion levels

D I now receive A&A at L 1/2 based on the 60% back injury

E. I submit that in my case, TDIU should count as a 100% rating for an additonal SMC step to M.

3. In my case I held TDIU from May 1999 thru Jan 2007. The rules state if a veteran is rated 100% a claim for TDIU is moot and will not be considered, however in my case I was totally disabled via a TDIU rating for my back injury almost 7 years before I was rated 100% for my lungs. So what I am saying is the va sholuld not be able to ignore that in reality I have two conditions that are totally disabling, One condition that required TDIU, another conditon that required a 100% rating. ( yes both times I was granted T/P)

So to furthur the arguement I think for purposes of SMC my ratings should be as follows:

100% asthma/COPD

TDIU 60% back injury

30% eyes

10% Knee lateral instability

10% Knee limitation of motion

10% Sinusitis

10% allergic rhinitis

10% tinnitis

10% internal hemorroid

K award loss of use of left foot

0% hearing

0% eppidmittis

100% stands by itself and , TDIU( back injury) if counted as an additional total rating increases my SMC one step from step L to step M. All my other ratings combine to 62.79 would increase SMC from step M to Step M 1/2.

Of course I could put forth JB's arguement that once a veteran reaches 100%, additional ratings are added using simple VA math not combined. Under either arguement I would receive the additonal steps in SMC. ( Using JB's arguement it might even increase my smc step greater)

Hope that you can understand my hypothesis now......I have not initated any claims based on this. I am just putting forth a situtation where I think I and others might benefit if TDIU were not tossed out because of a post 100% rating.

x

x

x

Teac, You're hard work deserves a reasonable doubt, but I have not yet read or seen the claim that thas put forth the argument that TDIU "stands alone" as a separate 100% rating. I do not want to be curt, but I think once the VA assigns 100% schedular, the TDIU becomes "moot".

Let me think about this some more and get back to you. It helps the search, if I know what search terms to use, typically I start with the Statute .. in this case, you are primary concerned with 38 CFR 3.351 and USC 1114 and additional 100% ratings --and even "earlier effective date" for SMC awards? Have you thought about an earlier effective date? ~Wings

Edited by Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

x

x

x

Teac, You're hard work deserves a reasonable doubt, but I have not yet read or seen the claim that thas put forth the argument that TDIU "stands alone" as a separate 100% rating. I do not want to be curt, but I think once the VA assigns 100% schedular, the TDIU becomes "moot".

Let me think about this some more and get back to you. It helps the search, if I know what search terms to use, typically I start with the Statute .. in this case, you are primary concerned with 38 CFR 3.351 and USC 1114 and additional 100% ratings --and even "earlier effective date" for SMC awards? Have you thought about an earlier effective date? ~Wings

Wings,

Go back and read bradley v Peake... had it not been for bradley v peake the idea of TDIu being a Total rating equal to 100% would have never dawned on me.... It was actually Bradley V peake this states that TDIU is not a moot issue for SMC purposes.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Wings,

Go back and read bradley v Peake... had it not been for bradley v peake the idea of TDIu being a Total rating equal to 100% would have never dawned on me.... It was actually Bradley V peake this states that TDIU is not a moot issue for SMC purposes.....

Teac, I'll read it again. I always thought that once a vet is rated 100% schedular, the TDIU was moot (dismissed, not relevent, dropped). You still haven't told me the statute or law that would permit the award you are seeking, I can only guess --and will read Bradly again. In the meantime, I hope that others will help you because your quuestion has me confused. Sorry. ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Teac - maybe the TDIU issue needs to go to the Court, just like the 1114(s) 100+60 SMC award issue!!! To the best of my knowledge, I read some yrs back that once a claimant is 100%, the issue of TDIU is no longer an issue because they pay the same and there would no additional benefit w/TDIU. I don't recall whether it was a court decision or a BVA decision. It kinda made sense, at that time, but this was definitely before Peake. The problem that I found was that, in some states, TDIU brings more benefits, to the TDIU vets.

pr

Wings,

Go back and read bradley v Peake... had it not been for bradley v peake the idea of TDIu being a Total rating equal to 100% would have never dawned on me.... It was actually Bradley V peake this states that TDIU is not a moot issue for SMC purposes.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teac...I pretty sure know what your getting at and it sounds reasonably correct. BUT, the one thing I was wondering about is; When VA mooted your 60% TDIU with 100% Schedular, did they at the same time bring the prior TDIU BACK to 60% instead of keeping you with 2 100% disabilities?

Coot

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teac...I pretty sure know what your getting at and it sounds reasonably correct. BUT, the one thing I was wondering about is; When VA mooted your 60% TDIU with 100% Schedular, did they at the same time bring the prior TDIU BACK to 60% instead of keeping you with 2 100% disabilities?

Coot

The revoked the TDIU but left the 60% rating in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use