Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hopefully The End Of A Long Road

Rate this question


RuskiLinguist

Question

Hello again, all. Just your friendly neighborhood RuskiLinguist here giving what I hope to be the last in a long series of upd VA Voc Rehab has saiates regarding the Social Security Claim I filed back in 2009.

I have followed almost all of the advice provided by the experienced folks on this site. I have a local attorney, after some serious problems with the SSD MillMachines who advertise a 99% win rate. This local attorney actually returned my calls, and called the SSA at my request to see why I hadnt been scheduled for my ALJ hearing after more than 16 months of filing that particular appeal. Now here comes the surprise:

I finally have a hearing date!!!! I will be going in front of the ALJ on the 4th of May.

I hope this is the last of the threads I have to start on this topic, and that my next posting will be in the Success Stories Forum.

I know there has been a bunch of information passed in this forum, and even if you think I should have read it already, I will not turn away any last minute words of wisdom.

Although I am nervous as a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking-chairs, I think I finally got myself a good attorney. That seems to keep my nerves from exploding.

For a refresher, I am filing due to PTSD, Major Depressive Disorder (rated at 100% from the VA) as well as digestive problems (rated at 20% from the VA) and back problems (rated 10% from the VA) All of thes conditions are service connected, and are well documented in my records. Even though I haven't been declared "unemployable", VA Voc Rehab submitted documentation that "Vocational Rehabilitation is NOT Feasible" for me due to my Service Connected conditions. They C&P examiner (Psychiatrist) and my primary Psychologist have also both stated that "my disabilities preclude me from gainful employment".

Again, Please feel free to give me any 2 cents worth, but as always, I can only offer a penny for your thoughts ;-)

Sincerely,

Your RuskiLinguist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I think you are overlooking the part where he reported that when the judge asked if there were any jobs available he could do with his current age, education, experience, and disability - the VE said YES - and rattled off a few jobs.

It was only when the judge added additional functional limitations that the VE said No.

Personally, I think that is what hurt the claim.

Once again, VE testimony can be challenged. The best place to do that might have been during the hearing though. If the lawyer let the VE statement stand unchallenged during the hearing - it might be harder to win an appeal on the issue. But harder doesn't mean impossible. However, the Appeals Council does not retry the claim. The basis for an AC review are:http://www.ssa.gov/O...03/I-3-1-3.html


  • There appears to be an abuse of discretion by the ALJ;


  • There is an error of law;


  • The action, findings or conclusions of the ALJ are not supported by substantial evidence;


  • New and material evidence, which relates to the period on or before the date of the ALJ's decision, is submitted and the ALJ's action, findings or conclusion is contrary to the weight of the evidence currently of record; or


  • There is a broad policy or procedural issue that may affect the general public interest.

IMHO You have won your appeal. The alj even though he/she has the final say so, he/she must go by the medical and vocational evidence and not his/her own opinions. Once THEIR vocational expert stated there are no other job's you were able AND qualified to do, and along the with the already medical prerequsites established, that should seal the deal. SSDI is based only on medical, vocational,age, and education. If you have all these i believe you have won your appeal if what you have stated in your previous posts are indeed true. GOOGLE "SSA GRID RULES" and this should give you some idea of how the ssa decides on disability or not.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate your insight very much. I know that in all of the forums I have become involved, that I am the only veteran with 100% SC disability who has been denied Social Security Disability. I have an attorney who wants her $6000, but I I can not trust anyone other than my fellow veterans.

This PRICK of a judge has gone from being a bad judge to being the worst judge in the entire United States regarding his approval of claims. He will never be held accountable for his indiscretion, and no one will ever get a fair ruling from him as long as he sits in his appointed position.

If anyone wants to understand the truth about these ALJ's, the do a google search on:

"ALJ disposition data" and you will see that Judge David Buell was allowed to xxxx me over and my congressional representative Dave Loebsack, did nothing more than monitor the shafting that I took from Judge David Buell!

How can we make these deliberate injustices a priority in our governments efforts?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had applied for SSI 3 times and the SSA had denied me each time. I'm 100%.

DAV IU 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Maurice,

I see your profile states you are 100% Individual Unemployability. Are you also 100% disabled, or is it a rating of less than 100% with the distinction of Individual Unemployability?

Either way, I find it unbelievable that one governmental organization can say you are not able to work, and another can then say you can. Different measurement criteria are an absolute cop-out, and completely without merrit. I feel the VA should be given the greatest weight since they are also charged with establishing that our medical conditions not only exist at a disabling level, but that the things we say happened in our past are also verified through some measure of investigative standard.

Anyway, I am working hard with my lawyer to draft a good appeal, but I am still looking for anyone with advice as to how to deal with ALJ's who are either crooked, or you pick your own adjective, but the point remains the same: There are so many of us getting screwed, and that number WILL grow as long as there is no voice for us in the 3 branches of government we ALL served!

Respectfully and dedicated to the good of many not just me,

Ruski

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use