Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How To Get Earliest Effective Date For Tdiu?

Rate this question


Ethan'sGrandma

Question

After many years of walking what seemed like near the cliff with my claim, I am finally rated, with TDIU deferred. I am a bit confused about this and am requesting any thoughts on what I can do to get the earliest date possible, if TDIU were to be granted. The POA that I spoke with today confused me even more when I asked if TDIU were granted, would the date go back to when I submitted my VA application for service connection (2005). I was told that VA looks at when the TDIU was inferred, or mentioned in documents, which makes it more confusing in my mind. If in an actual rebuttal from me, it would have been in 2010 when I successfully disputed a C&P where it was inadequate, including the examiner "missing" that I was considered unemployable, receiving SSA benefits since 2000, which would clearly be in VA records since I'd noted it in my original VA disability application. I am aware that one agency's decision does not impact on the other's decision, but wouldn't that be inferred from the original VA application? Additionally, I will have to go to another C&P to determine TDIU which he said would open up the whole claim matter again, but if they tried to reduce, that there are no future exams scheduled, which further helps with the rating that I received? I don't understand why the last C&P exam didn't cover it, but I suppose that's not the way they have operated, at least not with my claim. I don't grasp why it would open up the whole rating decision when it's only recently that the decision was promulgated. Okay, so I can be a bit paranoid, but I've gotten to be very distrustful after years of the mishandling of my claim, so am wondering exactly what is it that they could be looking for. In 2005, I submitted the information that I receive SSDI since 2000, but VA never sent for those records until 2010. I know this because it's in a written document which made me suspicious that they were looking for what I receive SSDI since at the inadequate C&P exam, it was noted that I am insulin dependent diabetic. However, I was not diagnosed with diabetes until 2004, so my SSDI has nothing to do with any other illnesses, except for the mental category. So, can anyone give me any information of how to proceed? Thank you so much!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

There are 3 criteria for an informal claim:

1. It has to be in writing, that is there has to be a written record of it.

2. The Veteran has to "show intent" to file for benefits. Seeing a doc does not necessarily "show intent" because it is certainly plausable the Veteran is seeking TREATMENT for his malady, not necessarily benefits.

3. The Veteran needs to "specify the benefit sought".

An "inferred" claim is different. The VA can "infer" that you are seeking such and such a benefit. Some claims are "automatically inferred", such as if you have a 100% P and T plus an additional 60%, then the VA must "infer" that you are seeking SMC.

Once way to get an EED is to demonstrate to the courts, that you have met the criteria for an informal claim. There are other ways, too. 38 CFR 3.156 c, New service records is another.

For more on winning EED's see this article

http://asknod.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/nine-ways-to-an-earlier-effective-date/

and

http://asknod.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/nine-ways-to-an-earlier-effective-date-part-ii/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got an EED based on a hospital admission. I had a GAF of 40 at admission. When I filed for TDIU about 6 months later that was the date I originally got as an ED. I appealed it based on my date of SSDI but the VA went with my hospital admission date which was the same as the SSDI date. You figure it. I filed for TDIU when I was 30%. I did not listen to those idiots at the DAV who told me I could not get TDIU unless I had 70%. I did get 70% 6 months later.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Of the criteria for an informal claim, listed below, number 3 seems to cause the most problems.

You see, the Veteran need not self diagnose his condition to apply for benefits. He does not need to specify

"I am seeking benefits for late stage DM11 with secondary peripheral neuropathy" and I meet the criteria for Total Disability Due to Individual Unemployabliity and seek that benefit as well." The doctor will confirm my diagnosis.

Instead, the Veteran can describe symptoms. Something more like, "I have pain in my feet and hands so severe I cant work, and I take shots for diabetics every day. I am in psychological counseling, and the doc will be making a diagnosis soon. I seek benefits for all these maladies"

The court wont tell you that you have to be able to pronounce, spell, or understand what peripheral neuropathy even is, tho many Vets are up on that.

You descibe the symptoms...you can even point to the body part that hurts.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John stated the stupid mantra of many reps from many vet orgs over the years :

"I did not listen to those idiots at the DAV who told me I could not get TDIU unless I had 70%. I did get 70% 6 months later."

I heard that too from the DAV when my husband at 30% applied for TDIU.

The EED for most TDIU claims is the date they received the claim.

The regulation states:

“The effective date of an award of increased compensation

shall be the earliest date as of which it is factually

ascertainable that an increase in disability had occurred,

provided that a claim was received within one year from such

date. Otherwise, the date of receipt of the claim is the

effective date to be assigned. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5110(b)(2);

38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2); see also Harper v. Brown, 10

Vet. App. 125, 126 (1997); Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App.

367, 369 (1991); VAOPGCPREC 12-98 (Sept. 23, 1998).”

What that confusing VAOLA means is that, once a higher rating is determined, then if the claim was received within a year of the 'factually ascertainable' increase in disability,then a more favorable EED can be given , due to the med evidence in the actual increase. Geez my explanation is worse than the reg is.

For TDIU claims-if a SSDI award solely for SC disability precedes the TDIU application within the year prior to receipt of the TDIU application, the VA will (should) award the SSDI date as date for TDIU EED.I have never seen them go back further than that year.

SSDI is actually an independent medical opinion.I would think any strong IMO that supports a EED,with a full medical rationale prior to the date of applying for TDIU could render a favorable EED.

Ethan's Grandma stated:

“I receive SSDI since 2000 “ If this was for the exact same sole disability that they award TDIU on, and nothing else , I think they would award an additional year retro for TDIU that preceeds the TDIU Application date.

EEDS are confusing.

VA gave me an EED date for my husband's IHD that corresponded with a VA C & P exam for PTSD.

NVLSP said it was a proper EED per the regs under Nehmer .

However the IHD was also the subject of both 1151 and FTCA cases and the medical evidence warranted a better 1151 EED,confirmed by all of the extensive documentation due to the FTCA matter.

But I still don't know if I will fight it. The very first diagnosis of his IHD came from me.. VA never diagnosed it in his lifetime.

I am more concerned about a new 1151 issue I have, since reading the Nehmer award.

The odd thing about award letters is that an award letter can certainly open a different door but I think many of us are so relieved it is over, we don't even want to fight over other issues.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use