Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Severing My Husband Compensation.

Rate this question


Cynthia80

Question

Im trying to get some insight on my husband Service Connection Compensation...In 2001 my husband tried to commit suicide after his mother died in May of that year he saw a mental health doctor on post in August and shot himself in the head in Sept he got of the army in 2005 after serving 6 years in there in 2007 he was awarded 80% from the VA in 2010 he was awarded 100% Unemployment in 2012 he put in a claim for TP well in August of 2012 he was awarded 100% TP the same year in Oct 2012 we recieved a letter saying that they are gonna severe his Compensation due to the fact they found that he was Sane at the time he shot himself...we have a hearing in Jan 2013 to plead his case the rep at the VA told us to get letters from his mental health doctor that he has been seeing since 2007 and his TBI doctor,i didnt know that they could take something back from a seriously disable person? we have been getting the run around with his Mental health records from the army i dont even know where to look...my Husband has a depression disorder,TBI,PTSD and has use of one eye! any help on this matter will help thanks

-Cynthia-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"due to the fact they found that he was Sane at the time he shot himself..

I do not know what to say. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot. (WTF)

Just reading the sentence saddens me....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think the VA is feeling the heat about vet suicides. Is the VA saying the vet's suicide was misconduct? What sane reason does a young man who is not suffering from some fatal illness have for attempting suicide? The VA is saying he had a "rational" reason for killing himself. When I was in Vietnam at least three guys in my unit attempted suicide, very serious attempts. I don't know what happened to them. One guy attempted homicide against a First SGT. He was out of his mind when he did it.

The VA has reached a new low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

FYI - The act of suicide in of itself is not done by a sane person and therefore he would not have been sane, in his attempt, and the VA would have a hard time proving he was sane. The law makes the assumption that we (humans) want to live and will do all we can to suceed in doing that, which is why hospitals go to extraordinary measures to save our lives, when we are unconscious and can't speak for ourselves.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I caught this post this AM and was very concerned for your husband

but there is much more to this then we know here and if you can scan and post the Reasons and Bases it would help more.(Cover the personal stuff)

You stated:

“In 2001 my husband tried to commit suicide after his mother died in May of that year he saw a mental health doctor on post in August and shot himself in the head in Sept he got of the army in 2005 after serving 6 years in there in 2007 he was awarded 80% from the VA in 2 etc”

Does this mean he got out of the Army in 2005 but had enlisted in 1999? ( the 6 years?)

Do I understand he shot himself in the head in 2001?

Yet he continued to serve in the Army for 4 more years?

VA could have called a CUE on their 100% P & T decision because, it seems you meant that he served 4 more years in the Army after this suicide attempt occurred, which could indicate to VA he was sane at the time of the shooting.

T8r gave you the exact links to M21 1MR that you need to read carefully.

I have a neighbor who gets DIC because her husband killed himself in service and it was not an accident, nor willful misconduct , because he had been found to be insane at the time of the suicide.

The Board of Veterans Appeals ( BTW all, the BVA has a new online search format, notr much different then the old one)

can be searched for self inflicted gun shot wound and these decisions show how VA uses M21-1MR to decide these appeals.

There is a lot of info missing from your posts........

Did the VA propose to reduce ALL of his SC disabilities?

Was the PTSD and the TBI contingent on or claimed as due to the self inflicted gunshot wound or were these ratings separate?

What was his actual VA rating for the GSW? As well as for the PTSD and TBI?

Any lawyers you contact will need to see the entire reduction decision.

It would help us here too.

4 years ago a Vietnam Combat Vet friend of mine killed himself. His death could not fit into the concept of “insanity' for VA purposes at all ,to make his wife eligible for DIC.

The BVA still adheres to the General Counsel's Precedent Opinion on “insanity” as found here:

http://www.va.gov/ogc/opinions/1997precedentopinions.asp under # 20-97.

I hope your husband has a copy of his military medical and personnel records.

Great link T8r! I have been studying the entire M21 manual this past month as VA does not always adhere to it at all and this can contribute to bad decisions and then to the backlog.

I have used copys of some M21 1MR guidelines to succeed in some of my claims and sent a copy of one part of M21-1MR with my recent 1151 issue.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That's a good response, Berta. There is much that is unclear in this case. I don't see how a vet could shoot himself in the head and keep serving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use