Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Examiner Said Ptsd

Rate this question


avcorpsman

Question

My husband went for a C&P exam this week for depression, panic attacks and anxiety. I was there with him. He's a Vietnam Navy vet with boots on the ground. We were asking to get these conditions secondary to SC connected diabetes and neuropathy. The examiner said it sounds more like PTSD. He applied for depression in 2002 at the same time as diabetes but was denied. They said he needed new and material evidence to reopen. This time we asked for it as secondary, He's had problems for years. He was stationed in FL and on search and rescue had to pick up body parts after accidents over the water. On carrier in Vietnam saw and treated pilots whose planes virtually disintegrated crashing into the carrier. Doesn't know how to document this. He was close to the pilots because he routinely tested them for flight duty. also an incident when he was to be flown home. In Danang waiting days for a ride they took mortar fire. What should we do now? any help would be much appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"Berta; Hate to jump in another thread but you brought up a big issue for me; how does the VA feel about newpaper articles used to help verify the stressor? In developing my own case I've heard conflicting information; one side of the argument says the VA gives absolutely no credability to them when deciding a claim, the other side says they do. For me thats a make or break."

As PR said ,if you can prove you were there.
For example
A few Marines 'volunteered' for a horrific job in Vietnam in 1965. My husband was one of those Marines. There was extensive write ups on the incident here in US of A newspapers and on TV because some deceased Marines, were within in a sealed amtrack or armored vessel on the bed of a river in Vietnam for months before they were retrieved. My husband was the first Marine to open the sealed door. what he saw was horrible. He could still smell it decades later and was part of the recovery of the bodies.
The families had to force Congress to get their loved ones removed from the river and home.for burial.
I am sure he could have found newspaper articles on this but the VA Director , who spoke to my husband after an incident at the VAMC that AM)in 1983 remembered the incident well and was in Vietnam at time, as a psychiatrist in Danang, of what happened and verified this stressor for my husband in minutes.Only the volunteer Marines of this unit knew what it all entailed and the Newark VA director had dealt with some of them incountry, as a shrink.after this terrible event.

It is all in the detail.

A vet won an AO claim...AO exposure in Alaska with a newspaper article.
(personally I think VA made a CUE on that award)

A widow won DIC with an article on a very rare form of cancer her husband died from .He was stationed near a small village in Korea where the article stated many had contracted and died from this extremely rare cancer. She probably got more info on this rare cancer from the internet too.The BVA awarded her DIC.

Aletta I just bumped up the new PTSD criteria.Somewhere in the regs it states how these regs apply to claims pending at time of reg.

We have a new Navy vet member with probably multiple stressors. I have a Navy vet friend who also has many stressors.

The stressor is defined in the regs, as to what VA considers a stressor under the new regs.

We advocates, lawyers, vet reps and veterans fought these regs but failed to convince VA they were unfair.

They help OIF and OEF vets and that is very good, but I think they made it harder for many other PTSD vets.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My hubby claim was approved in June 2010.. the new reg for PTSD went into effect the following month. Thanks Berta, I had went and found the Fast Letter from the VA on the new regs. I see it does not help BWN Vets much or others that were not in combat or near the actions.

What do you mean by 'bumped it up'.. I seen that phase before in another topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philip and Berta; thanks for giving my own case hope. Thank God that I saved my orders and travel voucher that shows I was where the article mentions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some BWN, Blue Water Navy, Vets friends. I am told that the new reg of 2010 also includes them. So I am thinking that if the ship that the first posted mission was to do search and rescue, he won't need a stressor proof either. That is not to say, get everything you can in case one needs to prove.

Thanks for telling me, PR, what bumped meant.. I found the post she 'bumped'..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes family members save letters and their envelopes from service personnel serving overseas ,that has a post mark on it, that can put them somewhere they need to prove.

Aletta,I am a member of Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association.

The BluewaterNavy.org web site is very good.

John Rossie who started BWN.org and BWNVVA and CArol Olzenaki, a BWN widow, have done some SVR shows here in our archives.

They keep me updated on the latest BWN AO bill and I will post in the AO forum any news I get on that.

If one joins the BWN.org site Carol can be reached there with any BWN widows who need claims help.

Her AO DIC was denied for years until she proved her husband had been on the COD planes (Air Cargo delivery) leaving his ship and flying to Vietnam..

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use