Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdiu/iu/unemployability

Rate this question


Veldrina

Question

....or whatever u wanna call it. We've received Fast Letter 13-13, which states that VA will no longer presume a claim for IU is a claim for increase in ALL s/c (service connected) disabilities. From now on you must specify which of your condition(s) is causing your unemployability AND you must submit a VA Form 21-8940 Veteran's Application for Increased Compensation Based on Unemployability. If you do not submit a completed & signed form, we are denying your IU. If you do not fill in which of your disabilities is causing IU or otherwise identify which ones (whether on a separate paper or VA Form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim, we are denying your claim. Just figured I'd give u all a heads up. I've included the actual Fast Letter, but figured I'd put it in "English" first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Keep in mind the new regulations say at least one of the service connected claims must be specified, but it doenst say you cant claim them all . or 2 or 3 or however many u think affect your ability to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I've stated this before, but when I assist a veteran with TDIU, I complete the 21-8940, I have the veteran go back and see his/her doctor requesting a letter stating the primary service connected disability on which the veteran can not work in gainful employment. I have them also explain how the additional service connected disabilities have an effect on the primary SC condition, then a statement on the veterans overall health and ability to work. Each claim that I have done with a letter from the doc have been approved (with the exception of those completed in the last 4-5 month).

My question is , Broncovet has stated that the CVAC has ruled that a 21-8940 is not required. I would like to have a copy of that decision. If anybody knows where I can get a copy, I would be most appreciative.

Also the form he talked about the 526, I don't know anybody that is submitting that form to the VA anymore. There are too many ez forms that are being done in lieu of the 526.

Anybody that is completing a regular 526 is just asking to be kept on the back burner....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The reason va is likely doing this is because they want to pin the veteran down on a specific ailment . Ok in 5 , 10, 20 years if a cure comes abt, then they can yank the rating. I would claim everything relevant, because anything that hampers u in any way, can affect your ability to work in some way or another.

Im learning how to play the va word game. The way they wrote it, it would lead the unsuspecting person to believe u must claim JUST ONE, disability as your reason. thats not the case. its trickery of words, to decieve.

It is nit picking, and trying to find technicalities and little caveats to deny. Its plain as day.

I suspect the PTSD rating will be a rating the va tries to deny soon, because so many are claiming it. same with sleep apnea, and back conditions.

IMPORTANT:
RVSRs must specifically address any identified disability(ies) as a claim
for increase in the rating decision, in addition to the issue of TDIU.
Edited by 63SIERRA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

As far as I am concerned the VA always did this! I was 70% for like 5 years and was never asked or for that matter considered for IU that I am aware of. I went from 70% to 100%+SMC-s schedule after that.

I again I wish that all service people getting out would take advantage of what is there for them and use it! When I got out it was a kick in the butt for not taking the reup and see you later Gi!

Stillhere

On the flip side this could actually end up help some vets! I know that I could have kept on working for a while longer at the time but that would have been just adding a few less years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Oh my gosh. This maybe explains why my husbands TDIU claim was just denied.

The VA only considered one sc issue in the decision we got today. He has multiple sc conditions totaling 90% per VA math. Because it was denied before this time we even sent an IMO saying his combined conditions make any work impossible - VA cherry-picked the part about his back in the denial.

VA said his lower back injury does not prevent him working a sedentary job with nothing said about the other injuries that DO prevent sedentary work in the IMO. We had to scrape for months to pay for that IMO and all for nothing.

Because we thought a claim for TDIU meant ALL sc conditions would be considered we did not list them all on the form - we never did before. There is not room in that tiny box! They used the one we listed - his back. Our VFW service officer said this was fine and all would be considered anyway. We filed a year before this letter came out.

We thought we were so careful to get it all right this time. But we have been through 15 years of denials and appeals to get where we are. I never have known VA to just approve anything the first time. Now more years of appeals. We are getting a bit old to keep fighting the VA - they are gonna win by attrition pretty soon!

This is so disheartening. :sad:

They most likely denied under 4.16a

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I can not beleive the VA would deny IU when someone has bowel leakage. (Not that I am doubting you.) When you appeal, ask them how many VA employees wear diapers. I mean puleeze....whew..

People wind up in a nursing home that are incontinent.

Its just incredible the stuff VA denies. Delay, deny, hope that we die.

You definately need to appeal this, if you have not done so already. That is, assuming you other wise meet the criteria. You know, you are not substantially gainfully employed, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use