Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ssdi After Awarded Tdiu

Rate this question


ncjoe1970

Question

My hearing is coming up next month for my SSDI claim. I have been on TDIU since March 2011 and my lawyer swears we have a very good chance of winning this case because I am already receiving TDIU from the VA. I have been turned down by Social Security before but have never had a hearing.

Most cases I see on here have already been awarded SSDI, before they received TDIU. I'm the opposite. Anyone else had a case like mine ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Day by day brothers and sisters. Hopefully this case will be the last step on the road to recovery. I have a very supportive wife that has stood beside me the entire way and has helped me maintain some kind of sanity throughout this.

Thank you all for your words of advice and wisdom. I wish you all the best.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"but also awaiting decision on On The Review Request. Attorney says this OTR Request is currently with the judge, who can make a decision based on my current record, in lieu of a hearing."

On the Record Review can be a good thing. That generally means that there is enough in the file to grant the claim without a hearing.

But even if the judge doesn't grant it on the record, doesn't always mean something bad. Sometimes the judge just has a couple of questions they want answered. My friend was just granted disability last year. Her attorney kept saying he didn't understand why the judge didn't just grant it on the record. Before the hearing, he requested an OTR decision, but the judge still held the hearing.

Since my friend's disability started with a work injury - there was quite a bit in the record that was "against" her claim -- mostly old records from the workman's comp doctors. But one old record from her OWN doctor, was what bothered the judge. Her doctor wanted her to get an MRI, but when she checked on it she was told that if she got tests / treatment from anyone but the workman comp doctors, that workman's comp would not cover her medical bills. The doctor wrote in her medical records that she refused to get treatment for her back condition and that she didn't want to get better. When your treating physician writes something like that in your file -- it is not a good thing. That was what the judge asked her about. She explained it to the judge - and told him she did get the tests and treatments - just not from THAT doctor.

Granted, I don't see how what you did or did not do over 10 years ago has anything to do with whether you are able to work now. But her doctor had painted a picture of someone who didn't want to get better (i.e. someone who was trying to be disabled).

The judge granted her benefits the day after her hearing. Her attorney called and told her that he had never seen the judge issue a decision that fast - but when he checked his cases the next day he saw the judge had already issued a favorable decision.

So even if the judge decides to have a hearing -- they might just have a couple things they need answered.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have walked out on and even cussed out several doctors over the years. The VA Psychiatrist, whom I trusted, that had me on 360 1mg Xanax a month, then started treating my seizure disorder as a "side effect" for years. After that, I stopped trusting any of them. When one of his staff members follows me to my car and begs me to get a 2nd opinion before he kills me, woke me up. The people at the rehab clinic didn't believe me at first when I told them how many Xanax I was on. It was a loooooong road to recovery.

Edited by ncjoe1970
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And now after two years of waiting I receive an email from my attorneys office that it most likely will NOT be in October because there is a serious backlog. Tell me there is one judge for every 100+ cases....

I am so sick of this shit !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use