Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Statement Of The Case Question

Rate this question


11cvolley

Question

I filed a NOD after the VA denied my increase request. I am currently rated at 70% and am seeking 100% and/or IU. Now they made this denial without seeing my SSDI that was awarded to me solely on my VA records. The RO now has my SSDI paperwork.

My question is, can they decide to grant me an increase while doing this statement of the case? I ask because the #800 number says a review officer has my file and is working on making a decision on my claim. The 800# also said that they're still working on the statement of the case.

I sent my lawyer an e-mail but they're out off the office due to weather conditions, so i'm hoping someone here can clear this up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Wow. Id be curious to hear their rebuttal.

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

also ask them to send you the specific "" codes"" they used to deny your claim. It seems SOC can be very bland.

almost caveman like.. va deny claim based on evidence no bueno. adios.

Once they produce the codes used to deny, your lawyer can exploit that. If they dont fit........ Houston we have a problem.

When you do get your SOC. Go over it very slowly. read it like the lost sea scrolls. Look for things they manipulated or changes.

example. on one of my claims. I was working under a heavy truck, and something came loose and struck me in the eye. causing corneal abrasion. an eye injury. it was an object, like a rock, or socket or something .

Va denial says. VETERAN WAS WORKING UNDER VEHICLE, AND SPECK OF DUST, LANDED IN HIS EYE CAUSING IRRITATION.

SEE HOW THEY OPERATE!!!!! THEY FABRICATED INFORMATION, TO DOWNPLAY AND DENY ME.

Nowhere in my records does it mention " speck of dust". my records dont say irritation either they say injury.

The va are masters of trickery, desception and word substitution. you must be vigilant.

Edited by 63SIERRA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You should not really talk to the VA if you have a lawyer representing you. The VA can twist what you say and make it hard on your POA. Have your lawyer do the talking for you.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You should not really talk to the VA if you have a lawyer representing you. The VA can twist what you say and make it hard on your POA. Have your lawyer do the talking for you.

John

Good advice. The only contact I had was when I called the 800# and they said its with a review officer awaiting a decision.

also ask them to send you the specific "" codes"" they used to deny your claim. It seems SOC can be very bland.

almost caveman like.. va deny claim based on evidence no bueno. adios.

Once they produce the codes used to deny, your lawyer can exploit that. If they dont fit........ Houston we have a problem.

When you do get your SOC. Go over it very slowly. read it like the lost sea scrolls. Look for things they manipulated or changes.

example. on one of my claims. I was working under a heavy truck, and something came loose and struck me in the eye. causing corneal abrasion. an eye injury. it was an object, like a rock, or socket or something .

Va denial says. VETERAN WAS WORKING UNDER VEHICLE, AND SPECK OF DUST, LANDED IN HIS EYE CAUSING IRRITATION.

SEE HOW THEY OPERATE!!!!! THEY FABRICATED INFORMATION, TO DOWNPLAY AND DENY ME.

Nowhere in my records does it mention " speck of dust". my records dont say irritation either they say injury.

The va are masters of trickery, desception and word substitution. you must be vigilant.

I'd get them from my lawyer, but the freedom of info act is still pending on e-ben. So IDK if my lawyer has the codes yets, but I will check. They also re-worded what I said to. Like when I told the doc I feel like I have a sign over my head that tells everyone what happen, the va said that I said people can read my mind.

Then when I said, 'I need glasses but I don't like people that close to my face, the va said I said, 'I don't want to see people so I don't wear glasses.'

My 'favorite' one is they tried to say that I said, 'everyone is out to hurt me.' When what I said was, 'I'm always on guard because something could happen anytime.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

just be careul not to step on your attorneys toes. if you have confidence in him or her, let them do thier job without too much birdogging,. VERIFY. but dont impede/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use