Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Secretary Shinseki Has Resigned

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Source:

Fox News, Pres Obama, 11:19 EST

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't think that is going to fix the VA. Shinseki was just a place holder in a failing system that has been underfunded and mismanaged for decades. Congress needs to change the VA to make it vet friendly. I have many theories on that subject. The VA in my area of my town was going to make an old National Guard Armory into a Vet clinic. The local govt. got involved and sold he property to the highest bidder. Screw the vets. This would have saved me miles and miles of driving, but not it is down the drain. I feel betrayed and I let my congressman know it. Now I think we should just all be under Medicare and let Uncle Sam pay our premiums. I wonder if this will happen since the VA is a master of cheating vets and medicare isn't. If I could get ChampVA with dental and vision included I would never use the VA.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Of course it wont fix VA! Its already known the problem is more widespread than JUST Phoenix! A plague of locusts has infested America, and the president responds by squashing the bugs on the White house lawn, telling people the problem is over! Firing a few people in Phoenix wont change the VA culture of denial for Vets, they have to fire multiple VA execs who have approved each others bonuses for "reducing the time it takes for Vets to get a VA appointment with the doc".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Vet's have been hollering for years that this thing they call the VA is broken in so many areas that it was just a matter of time before the whole thing crumbles......This thing as bad as it is , is just another one of many problems that should have neve been allowed to fester and I really hate the media coverage as it only focuses on this one issue.

Shinseki leaving is just more cover without adressing the entire failure within the system.......This will soon fade away, and the VA will continue to resume it's normal course of action, and Vets will continue to pay the price.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

No way!

Too bad this wont do anything to change the overall system.

They need to get rid of the bonus system. That encourages lying. Bonus systems are typically for a sales position and have no place in a government job. They can increase the base wage if need be, but the bonuses need to end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You have to admit that the hullabaloo helps hide Congresses responsibility for insuring that the VA "toes the line".

Sadly, the secretary was fixing (but slowly) some of the problems, and progress was being made, more so than in quite a few decades.

I'm afraid that the attention is focused in an area, while a problem, and something that should not be occurring,

is not the area with much more severe and widespread problems. (Compensation and Pension)

While reprehensible, the appointment fiasco pales in comparison to the monumental problems veterans have

with Compensation and Pension.

In addition, the VA has had a past history of just loosing referrals to specialty care (Consults). or failing to even tell the veteran

that they existed or why.

As veterans having to deal with the VA, we know that the VA has been totally screwed up for decades. Tying the can to Shinseki

is a monumental example of how politics can make things worse. It may be that the VA bureaucrats (but I doubt it!) will learn a painful lession

before things drop below the radar.

What to fix and how to fix it?

Finding out what to fix is simple. Really listen to the veterans dealing with the VA.

Scanning the news and VAWatchdog

"Secretary Shinseki's legacy as a combat wounded American warrior now may be brought to an ignoble end by bungling bureaucrats" and witch hunting politicians.

"More progress has been made during the Shinseki administration than any other. Veteran homelessness is improving, Vietnam veterans are getting better treatment for more agent orange conditions, and efforts to repair the giant backlog are in process."

"The Veterans Affairs Department has added only one name to an eye injury registry established by Congress in January 2008, senior VA officials told flabbergasted members of the House Veterans Affairs Committee panel on oversight and investigations today." (And DOD has about 23,000 in it's registry)

"In 2009, the Veterans Affairs Department canceled its patient scheduling system -- dubbed the Replacement Scheduling Application Development Program -- after spending $167 million over eight years and failing to deliver a usable product."

Why? It's now obvious that that it would have disclosed "inconvenient" facts and data, showing that the VA was sorely remiss.

"VA also has reduced down the number of patients prescribed opioids since the IG conducted its investigation in 2012, Petzel said, by offering patients education, training and Web-based tools to help with pain management. As a result, 39,088 fewer veterans received an opioid prescription from the VA in November 2013 than did in October 2012."

In actual fact, the VA just "cut off" many patients, "Cold Turkey" if you will, without any effective alternatives.

Many of those with serious pain complications ended up having to obtain outside medical services at their cost, not the VA's, to deal with the pain.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

is it just me,,, or is it that the system can gather all that information so quick.

i think the va handed the ig a prepaired package / to cover their ass.

ide like to see a list of those who acutally gets fired.

if heads roll at all ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use