Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Strange C&p Exam Today?

Rate this question


willidx4

Question

I had an exam for headaches,sinuses and both knees. The knee issues were both for increase from 0 and 10 percent. The Doctor never physically examined me for my sinuses at all, he also asked a just a few questions concerning the dates my headaches and sinus problems began. The knee examinations were over in less than a minute. The doctor had me hold onto a table and bend my right knee and bend my left knee. The doctors simply mentioned GW vets are given the benefit of the doubt concerning sinus and headaches as part of GWI not mention of my knees at all. I decide to leave well enough alone thanked him and left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

All you can do now is wait for the exam results and the decision then you can file a NOD and request a new exam if its not favorable because of the short duration.

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1. Diagnosis
------------
Does the Veteran now have or has he/she ever been diagnosed with a headache
condition?
[X] Yes [ ] No
[X] Tension
ICD code: 307.81 Date of diagnosis: 2015
2. Medical History
------------------
a. Describe the history (including onset and course) of the Veteran's
headache conditions (brief summary):
The Veteran states that he developed headaches during deployment
in Southwest Asia in 1991. He continued to have chronic headaches
over the years, even to this day. He has headaches once a week.
b. Does the Veteran's treatment plan include taking medication for the
diagnosed condition?
[X] Yes [ ] No
 
If yes, describe treatment (list only those medications used for the
diagnosed condition):
sumatriptan
3. Symptoms
-----------
a. Does the Veteran experience headache pain?
[X] Yes [ ] No
[X] Constant head pain
[X] Pain on both sides of the head
[X] Pain worsens with physical activity
b. Does the Veteran experience non-headache symptoms associated with
headaches? (including symptoms associated with an aura prior to headache
pain)
[X] Yes [ ] No
[X] Sensitivity to light
[X] Sensitivity to sound
c. Indicate duration of typical head pain
[X] Less than 1 day
d. Indicate location of typical head pain
[X] Both sides of head
4. Prostrating attacks of headache pain
---------------------------------------
a. Migraine / Non-Migraine- Does the Veteran have characteristic prostrating
attacks of migraine / non-migraine headache pain?
[ ] Yes [X] No
5. Other pertinent physical findings, complications, conditions, signs
and/or
symptoms
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Does the Veteran have any scars (surgical or otherwise) related to any
conditions or to the treatment of any conditions listed in the Diagnosis
section above?
[ ] Yes [X] No
b. Does the Veteran have any other pertinent physical findings,
complications, conditions, signs and/or symptoms related to any
conditions
listed in the Diagnosis section above?
[ ] Yes [X] No
6. Diagnostic testing
---------------------
Are there any other significant diagnostic test findings and/or results?
[ ] Yes [X] No
7. Functional impact
--------------------
Does the Veteran's headache condition impact his or her ability to
work?
 
[X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, describe the impact of the Veteran's headache condition,
providing
one or more examples:
Increased absenteeism.
 
8. Remarks, if any:
-------------------
No
 
RESTATEMENT OF REQUESTED OPINION:
a. Opinion from general remarks: Does the Veteran have a diagnosis
headaches that is at least as likely as not (50 percent or greater
probability) incurred in or caused by the deployment to Southwest Asia
during service?
b. Indicate type of exam for which opinion has been requested: Headaches
TYPE OF MEDICAL OPINION PROVIDED: [ MEDICAL OPINION FOR DIRECT SERVICE
CONNECTION ]
a. The condition claimed was at least as likely as not (50% or greater
probability) incurred in or caused by the claimed in-service injury, event
or illness.
c. Rationale: 1. The Veteran states that he developed headaches during
deployment in Southwest Asia in 1991. He continued to have chronic
headaches over the years, even to this day. He is competent and
credible to report his symptoms.
2. Today's evaluation finds that he has a diagnosis of tension
headaches,
which had its onset during deployment to Southwest Asia in service.
 
Edited by willidx4
additional text
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Were you in combat or in combat zone when the headaches started?  This could be physical symptom of PTSD.  They used to call physical symptoms of combat stress  other names I can't think of right now.

People in combat zones in WWII had all sorts of physical disorders from stress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

JOHN999, yes ( see below) filed the claim as related to GWI

Gulf War General Medical Examination

Disability Benefits Questionnaire

 

Rationale: 1. The Veteran states that he developed headaches during
deployment in Southwest Asia in 1991. He continued to have chronic
headaches over the years, even to this day. He is competent and
credible to report his symptoms.
2. Today's evaluation finds that he has a diagnosis of tension
headaches,

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use