Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

American Legion or Private Attorney

Rate this question


Fat

Question

I need expertise help.......

I was recently denied for a sinusitis claim.

I think the local regional office rater totally ignored evidence. Read my post on 8/7/15 and you make a determination.

I filed my Form 9 to the VBA.

I made contact with a law firm which handles veteran claims/appeals.

I think the American Legion has nice people, but expert help is lacking.

I'm considering sitting down with the law firm for a consultation.

I was told they don't charge up front and only require 20% of any money awarded.

In addition, we talked about requesting my c-file to strengthen my argument at the VBA level.

 

1. Has anyone dealt with a law firm for disability claim appeals (pros and cons)?

2. What services did they provide?

3. Where they present in Washington, D.C. or regional office for hearings?

4. Do you pay them directly or is their pay subtracted from retro amount?

5. Do they try to add additional language to contract about fees for services?

6. Are they able to address claim even though I have already filed form-9?

7. Will I sign form making them my new representative (power of attorney)?

 

Definitely all replies are welcomed...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

BTW, when a veteran files a formal NOD on a denial, that is supposed to automatically trigger a review of the decision, then RO either reaches a different decision or sends the SOC explaining the denial.  This thing about filing a formal request for a DRO to review it has confused me, because the NOD is suppose to make that happen, anyway ( I guess, unless you're providing additional evidence not previously available).  That being said, I have never received anything but a regurgitation of the original denial in the SOC received after filing an NOD with my arguments as to why the denial was wrong.  I just file the I-9 and appeal to the Board to get it out of the RO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I'd argue that asking for a DRO review is not the best way to go. It allows the clock to continue, and the VA has been known to delay telling the veteran the results until the appeal period has expired, or is about to. I had a DRO review turned around so fast several years ago that led me to believe that it was nothing more than a rubber stamp of the original denial.  Then, the VA sat on the appeal, and some years later, it was awarded via the Nehmer Review, with the EDD going back to the original claim date.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for the information. 

I was initially denied and filed a NOD (de novo review).

They denied the claim again and now I have filed the form 9.

I plan on getting a nexus statement for the sinusitis claim; however I'm waiting for my medical records (on CD) from the VA Records Management Office.

I'm planning on reopening my service connected rhinitis claim (0%) with new & material evidence.

I might let them handle that one claim and see how they do...........

 

MORE REPLIES WELCOMED............

In that case, going to the BVA, etc.  Go with an attorney.

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hold the horses for a minute Tonto,  I have a better plan... REQUEST A DRO HEARING. Go to the hearing with your evidence and present it to the DRO.. You can request and be granted a hearing at any time, You can bring in witness statements, your computer, give verbal testimony, ect.. you will likely speak with an RSVR who will then work with the DRO...

You want to keep it from going to appeals if you can. because it may get sent right back to the RO, and another goofball goofs the claim.

Have you recieved a statement of the case yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hold the horses for a minute Tonto,  I have a better plan... REQUEST A DRO HEARING. Go to the hearing with your evidence and present it to the DRO.. You can request and be granted a hearing at any time, You can bring in witness statements, your computer, give verbal testimony, ect.. you will likely speak with an RSVR who will then work with the DRO...

You want to keep it from going to appeals if you can. because it may get sent right back to the RO, and another goofball goofs the claim.

Have you recieved a statement of the case yet?

after re thinking, i think sierra is right, the de novo review should be automatic under a NOD anyways, but i read it wrong when i answered before.  I thought you already had a DRO HEARING, but it was just a de novo review.  Yeah request a hearing.  if that is denied THEN get a attorney and ride the BVA train.

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Read your contract with the lawyer very carefully.  You and the attorney are bound by what is in the four corners of the written contract.  Whatever else is said outside of the written contract has no weight if you and your attorney come to blows over something done or not done.   The lawyer may tell  you this or that but the written contract is what will hold up at any legal hearing if you and the lawyer part ways.  Even the best VA lawyers cannot turn a pig's ear into a silk purse.  You still need the evidence.  If you are going to hire a lawyer he will probably want to have a hearing with the VA at the local level if he is local lawyer.

I had a lawyer for my DRO Hearing,  BVA Hearing, CAVC and Federal Court Hearing.  I did not win the claim, but if I had a claim again that I knew was going to be disputed I would sure pick the lawyer over a VSO.  Many of the VSO's have little training and are so fearful of the vet ending up with a reduction that they settle for the least rating and least amount of retro.  If someone works for me I think they should get paid by me.  You get what you pay for and if you hire a lawyer who can refer you to IME's etc. then that is a good lawyer.  If the lawyer wants you to do all this on your own and he just show up to collect a check forget him/her.  Evidence is what wins claims and the lawyer should help you get that evidence otherwise what good are they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use