Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

100% TDIU P&T Question

Rate this question


foreveryoung

Question

Good afternoon all.

I was rated 100% TDIU P&T a few years back with 90% scheduler. Recently I was awarded a new SC disability rated at 50%, so that moved me to 100% secular, still showing the P&T. 

My question is; does the TDIU go away, and since I was already paid at the 100% TDIU rate, does any of that change due to the new rating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The Crazy one here, IMHO the 100% scheduler is a higher rating even though they both pay the same benefits. Keep in mind that when a veteran is granted TDIU the veteran combined ratings does not add up to 100%, they only add up to between 60% to 90% and VA pays them at the 100% rating.  Once a veterans combined rating hit 95% the VA rounds up the veterans rating percentages and pay the veteran 100% scheduler. We all know that a TDIU veteran cannot work but a 100% scheduler veteran can.   In a way the 100% scheduler rating overrides the TDIU.  VA normal statement would be like the veterans TDIU claim or rating is moot (not legally relevant)because the veterans combined or overall rating is 100% . Once you get your letter it should explain everything and since you are 100% scheduler you no longer have to send in the Employment Questionaire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

What about 100% scheduler where 1 of the disabilities is 100% from the MH, but even if reduced in the future the other disabilities still = 100%? 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This scenario was not part of the original post but if a veteran is rated 100% for a single rating and also has other ratings that add above 60% that does not warrant TDIU it warrants some type of SMC payment.

If you are referring to a veteran is rated 100% for a single ratings but that rating is reduced then VA should consider if the veteran other ratings warrants TDIU but a veteran does not normally carry both ratings.  I guess it is possible for a veteran to have two 100% ratings or a 100% scheduler and a TDIU rating like for 100% mental health and a 100%/TDIU for a cardiovascular condition but I bet this would still fall under some type of SMC payment. Maybe others will chime in and correct me. But this also was not part of the original scenario.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Mostly seeking to add clarification to the statement that a veteran that is 100% Scheduler can work. They can, but if a veteran is 100% scheduler for a single condition, but works, I would think that they would be re-evaluated- especially for MH issues since the definition of 100% for MH says "Total occupation and social impairment". My other disabilities, for example, would total 100% even if my 100% MH was to improve to where I could work some, but even though I am P&T I don't risk anything, even some P/T work of ANY kind, because of my fear of reduction even if I don't succeed at a not-mentally taxing employment activity. 

Edited by brokensoldier244th

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

"but if a veteran is 100% scheduler for a single condition, but works, I would think that they would be re-evaluated"

Actually, a non mental scheduler 100 P&T allows working.  TDIU and mental 100% do not, except under very restrictive conditions.

Any disabled veteran can be re-evaluated.  Occasionally, it even can actually result in increased ratings. If the VA wants to lower the existing rating,

there are several legal hurdles it must overcome. 

When this is done, the VA must show evidence of significant improvement, and be within certain time limits.  "More often than not" the VA fails in some way

to do this properly. Most commonly, when the veteran challenges the change per the VA "process", the VA backs down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use