Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Requesting review to see if I qualify for SMC-S

Rate this question


DocC03

Question

100% TDIU

Schedular rating 90%

70% PTSD

50% Headaches (Reason for TDIU)

10% Ankle

10% Tinnitus

0% Back

0% Hemmorhoids

I have a few new claims going on but I was granted TDIU exactly 2 years ago and all this has not changed since then.

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I just sent in a letter to the VARO and asked for "S" when I got an extra 60% and quoted Bradley vs Peake.   Then I got "S" plus 2 years backpay and they called it a CUE because they are so negligent that they don't check your rating for possible SMC until you bring it up.   You get the money for being Housebound but don't expect the VA to consider you housebound unless you are actually bedridden.  They still expect you to make it to your C&P exams and appointments even if you die getting there.   Muhammed does not go to the mountain, but mountain (vet)  must go to Muhammed be he housebound or not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

So I just received my denial letter for SMC-S. This is the reason for denial

"Entitlement to SMC-S is not warranted because the criteria regarding housebound have not been met. There is no indication that the claimant is substantially confined to his dwelling and immediate premises due to disability, nor does he has a singe service connected disability rated as totally disabling and additional service connected disabilities that are independently rated as 60% disabling. Review of record of evidence shows individual unemployability was granted based on your service connected PTSD AND muscle tension headaches. This does not meet the criteria for SMC under Bradley vs. Peake. TO be qualified under this court ruling individual unemployability has to be granted based on one condition considered totally disabling, not a combination of disabilities."

Thought on this??? 

Is this correct? 

Should I dispute this or did they handle this correctly?

Thanks

Doc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well, now. Here's a classic example of why a lot of us here are leery of tossing out advice when we haven't seen the ratings sheet or someone gives us incomplete information. You will notice I said you would be entitled to SMC S if, and only if, the VA did NOT combine the PTSD with the migraine headaches. It hinges many times on the order in which they are awarded. For example, if you filed for, and were awarded the headaches first, and were awarded the PTSD later, it could never be said that the headaches were secondary to PTSD. On the other hand, if you were awarded the PTSD and the migraines simultaneously, or the PTSD prior to the migraines, they could be combined as you can review  here in 38 CFR 4.124a:

Diagnostic Code8045 Residuals of traumatic brain injury (TBI):  
There are three main areas of dysfunction that may result from TBI and have profound effects on functioning: cognitive (which is common in varying degrees after TBI), emotional/behavioral, and physical. Each of these areas of dysfunction may require evaluation.  
Cognitive impairment is defined as decreased memory, concentration, attention, and executive functions of the brain. Executive functions are goal setting, speed of information processing, planning, organizing, prioritizing, self-monitoring, problem solving, judgment, decision making, spontaneity, and flexibility in changing actions when they are not productive. Not all of these brain functions may be affected in a given individual with cognitive impairment, and some functions may be affected more severely than others. In a given individual, symptoms may fluctuate in severity from day to day. Evaluate cognitive impairment under the table titled “Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment and Other Residuals of TBI Not Otherwise Classified.”  
Subjective symptoms may be the only residual of TBI or may be associated with cognitive impairment or other areas of dysfunction. Evaluate subjective symptoms that are residuals of TBI, whether or not they are part of cognitive impairment, under the subjective symptoms facet in the table titled “Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment and Other Residuals of TBI Not Otherwise Classified".However, separately evaluate any residual with a distinct diagnosis that may be evaluated under another diagnostic code, such as migraine headache or Meniere's disease, even if that diagnosis is based on subjective symptoms, rather than under the “Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment and Other Residuals of TBI Not Otherwise Classified” table   

Evaluate emotional/behavioral dysfunction under § 4.130 (Schedule of ratings—mental disorders) when there is a diagnosis of a mental disorder. When there is no diagnosis of a mental disorder, evaluate emotional/behavioral symptoms under the criteria in the table titled “Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment and Other Residuals of TBI Not Otherwise Classified.”

Having all the facts as well as the c-file is the gold standard for making a cogent decision in this business. I profoundly apologize for the advice offered but I can only opine on the facts given. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

No apologies needed. I reviewed the previous rating before I filed and I overlooked the part where the decision was based on both.

When I read the C&P notes from the TDIU decision it was clear that the doctor stated I was unemployable due to headaches and that I WAS NOT unemployable due to PTSD.

It's a learning experience for me as this is all new to me.

I am still confused on how the C&P says that PTSD DOES NOT keep me from working but the rater decided it does???

The following is what was in my TDIU C&P. This is where the confusion comes in. If you read this you will understand why I feel that the decision to deny SMC-S was done in error.

HEADACHE C&P NOTES: Veteran's headache condition impact his or her ability to work? [X] Yes [ ] No If yes, describe the impact of the Veteran's headache condition, providing one or more examples: the veterans headache condition at this time makes him unemployable, his daily severe pain prevents his ability to work a full time job. He can manage a few hours occasionally but could not be expected to work a full time job. He has these severe headaches daily, he has reported to his PCP that his headaches were preventing him from working, he is on SSDI due to his headaches as well. he has tried multiple modalities to improve his headahce condition and he states he hopes to find out what is causing them so they can be treated and he can get back to work, however at this present time he cannot work a full time job because of his headache condition.

 

PTSD C&p NOTES: Regarding Individual Unemployability: Veteran reports that most of his impaired functioning at this time is secondary to his headaches, however this is deferred to medical opinion. Independent of his physical limitations, he is independent in his ADL's. He remains capable of completing multi-step well learned tasks. His concentration, persistence, and pace can be expected to be moderately impaired in a work setting secondary to his PTSD symptoms. Given his PTSD symptoms, he would work best away from the public and independently, but is capable of superficial interaction with a few co-workers.

Edited by DocC03
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use