Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

RETIRED? NOW I AM DISABLED?

Rate this question


RAPIDFIRE

Question

This is a general question. One that has been fumbled around in my mind for some time, as I opinion this myself here. Do you think it is fair that retired military (with the exception of those who went through Physical Boards and Medically Retired, under 20 or 30 yrs.) should be able to also keep full retirement pay, plus VA Compensation? For me, this is what invokes this question, and quit literally nerves me and I think it has become an epidemic. Military service person (as example), goes on to complete full retirement and then all of the sudden near retirement has all sorts of medical problems (buddy system helps out, let's be honest here, wink, wink) and therefore receives both retirement pay/VA compensation (often near 100%) without reduction (not saying there aren't some legitimate cases). SO, IF YOUR SO DISABLED, how were you able to stay on Active Duty? I think the only exception should be for people who were in direct combat with combat injuries and or people in a uniform role were injured right before their retirement. If you were so disabled, like myself, you had to get out. This didn't used to be allowed, CRDP until 2004; the dual payment. And in fact, was used as a tool to torture people who were too injured or disabled to stay in as a jealousy factor would kick in, my own USMC experience (being that their retirement at 20 would only reach max close to 60-90% VA rating) and my opinion was tort (saw a lot of it with tons of young Marines, and dealt with it myself, even while being severely injured in OEF, blown spine, shrapnel in back, priapism for over two-weeks in war and on ship and nobody/command cared, how could this be, how could this exist, it did, and only because of the jealousy factor). Now, it seems like near retirees have been riding this boat, collecting CRDP/retirement. As illustration, I used to work for the Fed. Gov't, people would come in right before their civilian retirement and claim disability, they were working full-time (40 plus overtime) I remind you, and now, all of the sudden they are too disabled to work. Now, why, because SSDI over SS Retirement Pay is often twice as much as it kicks in a higher amount and you receive it decade or more earlier (plus your pension), if awarded, and likely with an atty. So, to me, this is one thing, for you, I am not asking you to defend or argument for yourself and become exploitative, compulsive, or vulgar-AFTER ALL, it is current law. I just want you to give me a clear conscious how and why this dual payout should be in receipt, and remember, if you are SO DISABLED to work, you shouldn't be on active duty, period. It is one thing for a disability to be caused or aggravated by military service, it is another things for this to effect your ability to work with such conditions through retirement, and if you have had such conditions they would be no severe enough to impact your service length, think re-rated for us who have been through hell with the VA's irate C&P's, rating downgrades, re-reviews, etc. It is kind of like the girls who have fun their entire enlistment/commission with loads and loads of guys and then cry wolf and say they were raped and receive compensation. By the way, I am not liberal, I am a patriot and if you get offended, you are not a true countryman.  

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATED 5/28/216

The basis for this discussion is prior to the 2004 effective law; military individuals would purposefully find ways to make sure (under their command) injured or otherwise to receive no VA compensation when they got out because in their eyes, at that time, you would get out and would receive more than them (and I am talking the Senior NCO's and Officers here at retirement), and did everything in their power to make sure treatment wasn't provided, etc. because of the jealousy factor $$$$ get people wrongfully off Medical Boards etc. it was an epidemic. Now, since that has changed (the law) the military care and recordings has improved dramatically since this jealousy factory had been about solvent. Now, anyone who was in prior to 2004 would share to comment about how these veterans were treated prior to such effective law because of the jealousy factor. I think the commentators so far have took this the wrong way. When I got out, I had shrapnel from a round in my back, a busted spine, partial paralysis, PTSD, hearing loss and headaches from explosions/IEDs.......and a bunch of other stuff prior to the 04' law/ OEF. I am trying to relate to others who got banged up, even while in training, and got screwed by your command because they in their eyes only saw you getting compensated, not your injuries (and did not treat you because of this properly).  

So, shouldn't veterans be able to prove that they deserve full retirement from the military plus VA compensation too. Not just the other way around. In my case, shouldn't it be streamlined where I can show, hey I have all the documents conditions right after I got out and had bunch of surgeries, etc. and my command where a bunch of jerks who got off on screwing peoples lives over and look here is the proof.     

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Edited by RAPIDFIRE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

What is justice?  Is it something that any of us dispense without error?  Or some utopia that is unreachable?  I can't tell you.

What I do know, is that I didn't game the system.  I put it all on the line, did not exaggerate, or hold back, just presented the truth.  

 

Guys get concurrent retirement and disability because they earned it.  I mean, how would it be if someone was 60% disabled, and lost 25 years retirement because of it?  Its not dishonest.  You put in 25 years, you should get retirement.  You get injured, you should also get compensated.  How is it that you get hurt on the job, and come retirement, you have to pay for your own disability.  You can get out and expect 20 years of employability, but the potential earnings are denied you because you can not work because of a bum leg, shot back, or something that maimed and crippled you for life.  


What is justice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Oh, oh, I dont see this ending well.........

Anyway, retirement and disability are two seperate things.  However, In the military and VA, they coexist.  Not the same entity.

To get a normal military retirement, you need 20 years active duty, or an non-regular retirement from the reserves, 20 good years and wait til age 60.  Both are based on points or days. 

To get a disabllity (from the VA) your need to show that you are less than what you were when you joined, i.e., they (the military) bought you whole and they (the VA) will compensate you for not being whole after your service has ended.

A lot of Soldiers end thier careers early, and some stick it out.  Both, with or without pain.  I got rifted(?) out after 27 years on my way to 41 years, which was my goal.

Now, late (or anytime) during your military carreer, if you should have a problem the military doesnt compensate you for it, they try to fix it (motrin, 800mg x3) and you drive on.  Only when you become too problematic do they seperate you, medically.  You can be in the reserves, and be 70% VA disabled and still be an active Soldier, etc.  Again, two seperate issues.

Anyway, always lean forward in the foxhole and watch out for your buddies,

Hamslice

 

Edited by Hamslice
spelling error

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Just to add, now I have cooled off a little, for perspective;  I am 100% with 17  SC disabilities.  I went to Bosnia twice(UAV MX), as an aviator, I was in Iraq three times, Afghanistan twice as well as OEF-P on a regular basis later on as I spent 15 of my 20 years overseas clawing to as close to the tip of Spear as I could.  In 2006, after a chemical exposure (or a few of them), they offered me 40% medical retirement.  I was a SSGT with 13 years at the time, and had only been flying C-130s for a few years (cross-train only, preferably from a MX background).  I still had career goals to meet and no idea what else I would want to do, so I fought it and jumped thru the hoops set up for me by the Command SG.  I fought my way back up to flight status and deployed 6 days later for my 3rd Iraq deployment. 

Before I left, I requested Special Operations duty and, after an interview, it was approved.  Two weeks after returning from Iraq, I went to 7 month long "advanced flying course".  I proceeded from there to fly Special Operations for the next 5 years.  My 'office' (MC-130H T2) cost $172 million and was MY responsibility.  I travelled to 48 countries during my career, at least 1/2 were third world.  I spent enough time in Korea playing with ROKSOF and SOCKOR to get my KDM, probably at least 5 times over. 

While flying, my wrist started 'inflating' with pressurization on the aircraft.  I went to the Navy hospital (Camp Lester, Okinawa), and they did an MRI and I was informed I had an 3.5 cm Sarcoma (cancerous tumor) in my wrist.  I went and flew for 3 more months, bouncing from one JCET to another, Joint INTL exercises and missions which would have been canx if I went down from flight status.  I never 'made it by' to let my Flight Medicine know.  You see, there are only 20ish Talons in the world, and about 38 FEs qualified to fly them, on average.  You don't screw your buddies by going down off status in my community!  I let my CC and our Ops Super and DO know what was going on and had their support.  I went all over Asia during that 3 months, often TDY in my own bed for a night between missions because there wasn't time to 'reset' between commitments.  I was in Indonesia, Malaysia, Korea, the PI, Viet Nam, Thailand and Cambodia during this 3 months. End of the road, I am flying missions out of Pnom Penh, Cambodia, doing the first low level flying they allowed us to do since Viet Nam.  We were shot at (small arms) by Poppy farmers in the mountains, then we had a prop malfunction and had to shut an engine down and THEN experienced a brake fire on landing that required us to Evac the aircraft and sit there waiting for parts for 2 days.When we finally started heading home, I was in the back (we took 2 crews, one tail) and the med tech that was with us saw it 'puffing up' during the ascent.  I never flew again, and I was at 17 years in service.  They medevac'd me to Balboa Navy Hospital in San Diego where I spent almost 3 months in therapy and procedures on what turned out to be an AVM (vascular tumor).  Unfortunately, my arm was not fully functional anymore and flying again was out of the question. 

I permanently lost my flight status, fought things out with the DAWG citing a lack of OMB (optimum medical benefit), they wanted to terminate with severance at 17-18 years!  Meanwhile, I was medevac'd again for about three-four weeks of medical tests. Good ol' boy network, you said, lol?  I fought, got the AFSOC SG to certify me medically to go fly UAVs.  That fell apart and I was cross trained  to an Education job.  I stood up and created an entire IMSO office, dealing with INTL Military Students.  I did that for my last 2.5 years, working 60-70 hours a week, sometimes 7 days a week, up to 20+ days without a day off sometimes.  Hard to worry about pain and PTSD when you stay that busy.  I had hidden/put off many, many medical issues for years and years, since they would interrupt my flight status.  Now, it no longer mattered.  Within 6 months BEFORE I 'dropped my retirement papers' I had two major surgeries.  I had a 3 level c-spine fusion and a Full Frontal FESS (5.5 hour sinus surgery that almost cost me my life). 

BTW, below are my ratings, first time with lowballs and about 5 things that they did not connect since they did not obtain complete records SINCE service, those will be NODs as well as several of the 0%'s and the spinal ratings were VERY low.  They also 'recommend I claim other things, including my scars, deviated septum and PVD.  The last one IS a death sentence, eventually for most.  By your statements above, you don't think that guys CONTINUE to get battered for years and years?  Maybe in an admin job, but those guys have issues from sitting around all the time, too.  I will personally be fortunate to make it to 60.  And you are hating on retired vets for, in my case, about $1200 after taxes?  Seriously?  You are a young buck.  I have four children, the youngest just turned 7 and the oldest is 20. They rely on me to provide for them, we aren't talking living in luxury here, we are talking enough to get by.  Take a look below, I am curious which of my claims was a "BS money grab"?  Please let me know!  Or is it just that I persevered and 'mostly' obtained my goals in my military career that upsets you?

70% post-traumatic stress disorder (also claimed as adjustment disorder)

50% obstructive sleep apnea   

50% sinusitis (claimed as chronic pansinusitis)

30% headache syndrome to include occipital neuralgia (claimed as migraine headaches and occipital nerve impingement)

20% carpal tunnel syndrome, right upper extremity to include lower radicular group and cubital tunnel syndrome post excision of arteriovenous malformation (also claimed as peripheral nerve injury shoulder, neuritis median nerve right arm)

20% status post cervical vertebral fusion C4-C6 to include myofascial pain syndrome (claimed as herniated disc (c5-c6) left, cervical spondylosis)  

10% degenerative arthritis of the spine to include lumbago, lumbar spondylosis and myofascial pain syndrome (claimed as lumbar bulging disc l4-l5)

10% left peroneal neuropathy (claimed as deep peroneal nerve atrophy)

10% varicose veins, right lower extremity (also claimed as venous reflux disease)

10% varicose veins, left lower extremity (also claimed as venous reflux disease)

10% seborrheic dermatitis 

0% radiculopathy, left upper extremity

0% carpal metacarpal arthritis, right hand (claimed as osteoarthritis right hand)  

0% vasomotor rhinitis (also claimed as nasal polyps)

0% lliotibial band friction syndrome, right thigh

0% ganglion cyst, left wrist (claimed as ganglion left/right wrist)

0% meralgia paresthetica, right lower extremity 

Edited by TALON II FE
content and grammer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

TALON II FE:  Wow!! as JLO would say, your story(s) gave me goosies!!    You my friend are truly one of the many unsung heroes!!

While reading your post, my mind was along for the mission(s) with you.  Thanks for sharing your life's accomplishments with us fellow vets.   You should get someone to help you write your autobiography!!   Turn your experiences into a "best seller"!!     Again, thank for sharing!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
7 minutes ago, THOMAS89031 said:

TALON II FE:  Wow!! as JLO would say, your story(s) gave me goosies!!    You my friend are truly one of the many unsung heroes!!

While reading your post, my mind was along for the mission(s) with you.  Thanks for sharing your life's accomplishments with us fellow vets.   You should get someone to help you write your autobiography!!   Turn your experiences into a "best seller"!!     Again, thank for sharing!!!!

 

10 hours ago, TALON II FE said:

and THEN experienced a brake fire on landing

TALON II FE:  Do you think the "brake fire" could have been caused because "regular air" was in the tires instead of nitrogen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, THOMAS89031 said:

 

TALON II FE:  Do you think the "brake fire" could have been caused because "regular air" was in the tires instead of nitrogen?

No, I think the pilot hammered on the brakes too much, because he didn't compensate enough for the reduced reverse thrust with the #2 engine shut down and rolled it out too long.  It was our last flight before heading home. I can hit him in the head with a flashlight, but I can't reach his feet, lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use