Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How long does it take USASCURR to verify a stressor and send the informatio to the VA?

Rate this question


kent101

Question

I just saw on ebenefits and update that says "PTSD diagnosed, confirm stressor, to USASCURR". U.S. Armed Services Center for Unit Records Research (USASCURR). How long does it normally take for USASCURR to confirm a stressor and send it back to the VA? Also I only talked to a licensed clinical social worker/readjustment counselor at my local vet center about my PTSD issues. Does that mean if they find a stressor that I still need to go to a VA Psychologist to confirm my PTSD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I did not even know the VA still required a confirmed stressor for PTSD?  I thought if your stressor sounded viable to your shrink and you got the PTSD DX from the VA then you were good to go.  If they are going back to the confirming stressors via unit records then a lot of vets are going to be crying.  I though that if you were in a combat zone and your VA shrink believes your story of fear and stress brought on by fear of hostile action that was enough these days.  For RVN vets they required proof of a stressor as in direct combat with the enemy or indirect fire hitting your position.  I thought that all changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The stressors still need to be mention for the record  if veteran as a CIB or any mention of certifcates/ribbons Purple Heart  from combat duty  in a U.S. Conflict  then the stessors are waived  but it is still of record, the examiner reads it and usually skips this part of the C&P EXAM.. My C&P examiner mention to me  she has read about my stressors and I won't be asking you about them...& went on to something else.

if veteran don't have this on his DD 214 Then if he can prove he was in hostile enemy territory and in fear for his /her life  with unit records or buddy statements and have prof and time /dates with in reason or within 10 days of action of the location.

As for as how long does it takes the VA to send out for this information  is any body's guess/  they are suppose to send for it when they start working your claim.    when you submit the statement in support of claim   it also has the FOIA added in.  but a lot of it depends on the rater that works your claim.

jmo

..........................Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The 2010 PTSD regulations, available here  under a search, will concede stressor if the conditions of service/MOS are consistent with fear of hostile activity and/or close proximity to hostile fire.

These regs were written however to make claims easier for incountry OIF/OEF veterans.

"Also I only talked to a licensed clinical social worker/readjustment counselor at my local vet center about my PTSD issues. Does that mean if they find a stressor that I still need to go to a VA Psychologist to confirm my PTSD? "

Yes. The PTSD diagnosis must come from a VA Psychologist or psychiatrist via a C & P exam.

It pays when describing a stressor to VA, to give as many details as possible and to try to narrow down the date and place as best as you can.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Ms berta said '' These regs were written however to make claims easier for incountry OIF/OEF veterans.''

I Might add  for Vietnam Veterans  Also.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use