Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pending Disabilities E-Benefits

Rate this question


CaliBay

Question

Hello Hadit Community,

I have been watching E-Benefits like a hawk for the last month waiting for some movement on my DRO Appeal, which was submitted on April 2016.  I always check "Disabilities" on my dashboard and see if my rating has gone up or down and it shows the percentage (50%) "Rated Disabilities" with each condition that is service connected (PTSD) below it and also conditions that were denied deemed not service connected.  So below Rated Disabilities is "Pending Disabilities" and it shows the date I appealed (04/2016), the condition, and NEW right next to it.  There are about 10 conditions I am appealing.

Yesterday, I checked E-Benefits and Pending Disabilities has no data to display.  Would anyone have any insight to why this may have occurred.  Could someone finally be reviewing my appeal, decided my appeal, or approved/denied my appeal?

So I did check the whole site under Historical Claims, Documents and Records to generate a benefit letter, and checked the claim and appeal status.  Also I have my bank set up to e-mail me for any deposits.  Any insight based on your experiences is welcomed, I appreciate it.

 

CaliBay

 

Screenshot_20161129-195353.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

CaliBay,

First off, checking ebennies will drive you insane, if you do it too often...try once a week, like every Monday.  Ebenefits is notorious for inaccuracies and slowness.  Many on here will tell you that they have seen some pretty crazy things on their own ebennies accounts.

And welcome to Hadit!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Cali, your eyes are going to cross, checking Eben regarding updates to a NOD DRO (?review-Hearing?) filed what 61/2 mos ago. What are you expecting time wise? Did you provide Evidence for a Hardship Hearing or Review?

No Hardship bump = about 18 mos on DRO Review Decision or 3 -4 yrs on a DRO Hearing Date, with about another 6 to 9 mos for the Decision. Do your Appeals research and try to be realistic in you expectations. Would probably take a lot of you anxiety off the table.

At your current 50% SC, an IU Claim would be administratively Denied, you don't have the Statutory combined SC numbers for filing IU.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
42 minutes ago, Gastone said:

Cali, your eyes are going to cross, checking Eben regarding updates to a NOD DRO (?review-Hearing?) filed what 61/2 mos ago. What are you expecting time wise? Did you provide Evidence for a Hardship Hearing or Review?

No Hardship bump = about 18 mos on DRO Review Decision or 3 -4 yrs on a DRO Hearing Date, with about another 6 to 9 mos for the Decision. Do your Appeals research and try to be realistic in you expectations. Would probably take a lot of you anxiety off the table.

At your current 50% SC, an IU Claim would be administratively Denied, you don't have the Statutory combined SC numbers for filing IU.

Semper Fi

Thanks Gastone and Andy for the input.  I already think my eyes are crossing, I check at least twice a day.  I'm currently off work so I need to do something instead of that.  My claim at the notorious Oakland took only 4 months for them to deny which I believe is very expeditious.  I was hoping the appeal wouldn't take the normal 12-18 month timeline.  And Gastone, it has been 8 months :-).  Now I have researched 100% PTSD, is it possible to work with that?  I have researched this topic multiple times and I cannot find a definitive answer.

My appeal was for an increase for PTSD from 50% to 100%.  Also I am appealing sleep apnea for 50%.  This would make me eligible for TDIU right, which was requested in the appeal as well.  No hardship filed.  The NOD DRO appeal is for a De Novo review and a request for an informal hearing. Not sure if the informal hearing will increase the necessary wait.  I finally have gone to my VA and they have two PTSD related groups I plan on attending.  One is a support group and the other is a therapy group.

 

CaliBay

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Calibay,

By the nature of PTSD that grants you a single 100%, the symptoms would make it near impossible to work, which is why the PTSD was granted(hypothetically speaking) at 100%.  Now if you get 100% extra schedular(?) which is to say your total combined SCDs adds up to 100%, then work is possible.  Gastone will have a better answer for you, but I think I got inside the ballpark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Cal, might just be me but I think your really off, thinking your going to get a PTSD SC 50% increased to 100%. I'd really like to see your redacted C & P PTSD DBQ, would be very helpful.

You may or may-not be a 70%, can't tell really, without looking at the DBQ.

DRO De Novo (fresh eyes) review is an automatic, as long as the mandatory submission of the New & Material Evidence Requirement is met. Has the N & M Evid requirement been met?

From your above post, I still don't know if your requested a DRO Review (you don't get a face to face with the DRO), or an actual DRO Hearing (you and your Rep set across from the DRO) where you present your case. All DRO Hearings are initially Formal (Recorded & Transcribed), unless you request at the beginning of the Hearing, that it be an Informal Evidence Discussion (no recording & transcription).

Let's say what I think is wrong, you get a DRO Award of PTSD Rated as Scheduler 100%. Technically, you could have earned income in any amount (Skys the Limit), even exceeding the VA SGI of $12,400 per year because your not Rated IU.

VA Yearly Earned Income 21-2140 reporting is only required with IU, not 100% SC Scheduler. 100% Scheduler Vets are not required to provide yearly earned income information to the VA.

Semper Fi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use