Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

Top 10 VA Disability Claims Articles

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Some Interesting Statistics (not Scientific)

Rate this question

rdawg

Asked by rdawg,

 Share

Question

rdawg Proficient

rdawg

Posted
Posted

Baltimore Ro for 2006

390 cases adjudicated by the BVA

274 remanded

116 decided

of those 116

73 for either increase above 10% / or bilateral tinnitus. All denied.

46 others

of the 46 others

25 denied

11 granted

6 withdrew the appeal

1 died

Who was it saying that you should skip the denovo review and go straight to the BVA??

11 of 390 total claims = 2.8% received the benefits claimed. Now that's the kind of math the VA likes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Pete53 Grand Master

Pete53

Posted
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

I went to BVA and waited two years and asked for a hearing and won in a few months. Matter of fact I think the BVA sucks also. The truth to me is that the VA/BVA know a good claim from a bad one but they don't mind delaying.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rdawg Proficient

rdawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think Terry might be on to something here.

I just looked at 2005 stats for Baltimore RO.

421 cases adjudicated by BVA

376 Remanded

45 decided

8 grant of benifits

3 withdrawal of appeal

3 deaths

89% remanded. It looks like Baltimore is just playing the "lets deny, if they appeal then we'll do our jobs"

Question: Why would someone go thru all of the trouble of appealing and then withdraw the appeal??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • HadIt.com Elder
john999 Grand Master

john999

Posted
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

The thing is if you go the BVA and have to wait two years for a remand back to the same RO that is two years down the drain. I know because it happened to me. My C&P exam was flawed so I got a remand back to the RO to do another C&P. Then the RO gave me another flawed C&P exam. This is when I went into overdrive and started bombarding the RO with new evidence. I had no intention of going back to the BVA and waiting another two years. I did go to the DRO eventually and got my IU.

The VA is so flawed I don't know where to go except I like to be able to constantly moniter the claim and submit new evidence. I got a DRO Hearing within one year. I wonder what the remand rate for my RO is being the St. Petersburg Regional Office. Where did Terry get this information or whoever got it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cavman Experienced

Cavman

Posted
Posted

Terry:

I feel if you really feel you have your ducks in a row and you have excellent evidence along with a real disability issue you are better off going the RO route with an appeal? You think this is wrong?

Cavman

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!

  • Recent Achievements

    • Community Regular
      Troy Spurlock
      Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Week One Done
      KMac1181
      KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      jERRYMCK
      jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      KMac1181
      KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      Lebro
      Lebro earned a badge
      First Post

  • Our picks

    • Are all military medical records on file at the VA?

      RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,

      I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
      RichardZ

      Picked By

      RichardZ,
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?

      Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,

      Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
      yellowrose

      Picked By

      yellowrose,

    • Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court

      broncovet posted a post in a topic,

      VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,
    View All
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use

  I accept