Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appeal W/non Sc Ssd

Rate this question


Cavman

Question

old romad`s appeal results makes me worry more about my appeal. I am getting SSD for a non SC disability and have asked for IU in my SC Ptsd appeal. Even though 2 IMO`s state I`m unemployable, I was already unemployable on SSD. Can this have an effect?

Cavman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I can tell you the VA used half a sentence in my own IMO report to deny IU. The IMO was done by a clinical psychologist. He gave me a GAF of 40. I was already at 70% and trying to get IU. The psychologist mentioned that I had shoulder pain. The VA blamed my IU on the shoulder even though I had SSDI and disability retirement from post office due to a SC emotional disorder. Anything you give them they are going to use against you, so only give them stuff that supports your SC condition. I had three doctor's reports and years of medical stuff from the VA and yet they focused on my shoulder pain. I won eventually but it took another IMO and a year of appeals. IU is granted for SC conditions that are the sole cause of your inability to hold a job. Like Phil says they are not your friends and don't want to pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can tell you the VA used half a sentence in my own IMO report to deny IU. The IMO was done by a clinical psychologist. He gave me a GAF of 40. I was already at 70% and trying to get IU. The psychologist mentioned that I had shoulder pain. The VA blamed my IU on the shoulder even though I had SSDI and disability retirement from post office due to a SC emotional disorder. Anything you give them they are going to use against you, so only give them stuff that supports your SC condition. I had three doctor's reports and years of medical stuff from the VA and yet they focused on my shoulder pain. I won eventually but it took another IMO and a year of appeals. IU is granted for SC conditions that are the sole cause of your inability to hold a job. Like Phil says they are not your friends and don't want to pay.

How right you are, I had ptsd on my ssdi as well as spinal trouble, two imo's from my doctors saying unemployable from both, I would advise anyone not to mention ssdi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Isn`t there a written VA rule somewhere that SSD is not supposed to have any bearing on VA decisions regarding claims/appeals?

Cavman

No, actually I've seen something and posted it once, that the Congress has instructed the VA to go along with the SSA when the SSA has determined that you are qualified to draw SSDI ( obviously, this only applys where the condition that you are drawing SSDI for is the same condition that you should be drawing TDIU for).

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest fla_viking

Dear Jhon

The VA side steping issues is the tactic and it does not matter what the veterans provides. In my case all they had was my disablity before them. They rated me 30% by using the disablitys listed in the DSM 3 that I did not have. It was a deperat grasp at straws by the VA.

I argued against the VA saying it was unfair to require me to exhibit every symptom listed in the DSM 3 so the VA could not pick one I did not have and deny my claim. It took years of appeals but I won.

Unless they change the VA people who use such cheap tricks. There is nothing the vet can do. The VA will continue to pick any thing they want to string out a claim. It is up to the vet to fast track there own claims around the VA stall tactics.

Terry Higgins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Isn`t there a written VA rule somewhere that SSD is not supposed to have any bearing on VA decisions regarding claims/appeals"

There is an old reg somewhere about this- However the CAVC long ago-stated that SSDI records should be obtained and considered by VA particularily when the SSDI award is for the same condition claimed as SC.I sent VA in 1992 a copy of Washington V Derwinski with the award letter Rod had from SSA.

The DAV NSO was very negative as to whether his SSA award would help or not-

I sent the NSO a copy of Washington V Derwinski too-then he changed his tune-

My husband had SSA award 100% PTSD-but the VA failed to obtain these SSA records for years-

as I recall a VA psychiatrist who began treating him shortly before his death- stated that

not only was he receiving SSA for PTSD but the doc also listed the test results of 6 psychiatric

tests he gave Rod, gaf 34 0r 26 -maybe he had both-said he was unemployable due to PTSD and his PTSD from Vietnam was catastrophic.

I dont know if VA ever did get those SSA records-

Even if the SSA award is not for potential service connected conditions- it could possibly be at some other point in time-

what I mean is for years vets probably had SSA for diabetes so severe it had caused other major disabling conditions.

If they claimed it and were denied-and were AO vets, when the DMII regs came into play-

those SSA records were very probative to award the vet a proper DMII rating.

In many cases DMII vets, denied by VA -received SC awards and lots of additional retro due to the newer DMII regs and the AO Nehmer decision.

Full story in the VBM.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use