Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rate this question


Wise Guy

Question

I have a C&P Exam on Wednesday and I'm afraid I'll get denied. Flat feet was denied before along with Plantar Fasciitis because it's not service connected. I went back to my physician outside the VA and he typed my nexus as follows:

"Bilateral flatfoot acquired possibly during time in military. When not congenital as a cause, pes planus (flatfoot) is caused due to ill fitting shoe-gear without subtalar range of motion support, which could have been a result to time in service, 51% probability.Patient presents today with bilateral heel pain, worse right foot. Patient states that the pain is 2 out of 10. Patient denies any injury. Patient states he is having pain to the plantar aspect of his right heel that has been going on for several months. Patient denies being diabetic. Patient states he received custom orthotics as a week ago and has notes slight improvement. Patient denies taking any anti-inflammatories. Patient states that he has noticed his achilles feeling tight during athletic activity. *****Physical exam: Decreased ankle dorsiflexion noted bilateral. Mild tenderness to palpation to the plantar medial aspect of the right calcaneus. No pain with lateral compression of bilateral calcaneus. No pain along posterior tibial tendon bilateral. Increased pronation to patient's mis and rear foot bilateral. (The X-rays show as normal)"

It got denied due to not being service connected, so I went back and got the below nexus typed and signed. 

"After reviewing ******** service record at my medical opinion is his pronounced bilateral pes planus or flat feet are connected to his time in service with the Marine Corps. Plus, his flat feet are due to high impact physical activity for military training such as marching drills, drills at Corporals Course, Sergeant course, Intermediate Administration Specialist Course, and the wearing of combat boots. These have caused strain on his posterior tibial tendon resulting in painful flat feet. The diagnosis of pronounced bilateral flat feet is severe with fitted soles. He still has symptoms with a pain level ranging to 8 out of 10. Recall treatment options have been discussed but will be deferred at this time."

 

This is good but I don't know if it will connect come to think about it. From my recollection, I only went to medical once for plantar fasciitis and it's not shown as chronic. My flat feet was marked as normal upon entry of the Marine Corps and wasn't marked at all for my final physical. There's no check in any of the boxes indicating if my feet were normal or not. The ball was lazily dropped. I did just get a service connection for my hip injury. Should I go back to this doctor again and have him add a sentence that says, "Also, it is more likely than not that his pronounced bilateral flat feet worsened following the injury to his right hip with compensating for the pain"?

 

Or does the VA Compensation even contact the doctor to check to see if they generated it or edited it? I have 1 full day to figure this out ands submit to add to my claim for Wednesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Wise Guy This is my opinion, and I am not a doctor. I think that it is kinda weak. You never know if your evidence is good enough going into an exam, or how open minded your examiner will be. But you have been denied for the disability before, and that is a hard hill to climb because the will be looking at the previous decision. He said your foot condition "possibly" caused by your service. Didn't say to what degree of certainty, such as "more likely than not." He needed to be definite. Your idea to get a modified statement is better (it is more likely than not that his pronounced bilateral flat feet worsened following the injury to his right hip with compensating for the pain",) but it is changing your position I believe from direct to secondary. IMHO your doc has to now talk to the rationale that your now s-c hip condition causes your foot pain. Needs to refer to medical evidence, like journals or known published documents. Is your doc Board certified? If so, make sure you have his pedigree included. How long have you been out? If you change your direction to secondary to hip, then it isn't important. If not, showing continuous medical treatment would be a factor. If you are claiming direct service connection, showing med records, etc. in the service is critical. If you go with secondary, not a factor. Strengthen your nexus for secondary IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

When applying for disability compensation there are three elements that must be present, 1 in most a cases  current diagnosis of a "disability" 2 an injury or disease in the military of the disability, 3 a Nexus (at least as likely as not). You should request your C-File so you can see what the VA sees. You can also fill in some the blanks in your records with lay statements (self, friends, family, and old battle buddies). You have to paint a picture of your disability "chronologically". Take your time. @GBArmy has gave me a lot of info also.

Edited by Miken2c74
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Patient states he received custom orthotics as a week ago and has notes slight improvement."

I get custom orthotics from my podiatrist- some still take plasters casts but he uses a new method, and it takes a few weeks for them to be made.

Was the medical opinion prepared by a podiatrist?

If not, would your podiatrist be willing to  make a nexus statement?

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The fact that a new exam has been ordered is a good sign in my opinion. They need to see your current level of disability and fill out a new DBQ. They will also weigh this new evidence from your nexus letter against your previous denial and the new medical opinion that be written in your upcoming exam. Was this nexus written by an orthopedic surgeon or a podiatrist?  Either one would be good. I’m sure your upcoming exam will be conducted by a nurse practitioner and your nexus letter if written by an orthopedic surgeon or podiatrist should carry more weight. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use