Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

VA Claim Deferred After C&P for IMO and Higher Evaluation?

Rate this question


yanrogue

Question

Hi, new to the forum and thank you in advance if you can provide any insight.  

I talked to the VA today because I was confused about my claim, they approved part of my claim and deferred the other half of it. I searched a lot of post here and being deferred is normal for the va, but what confused me was why they deferred it. The reason they deferred my TBI was because they wanted a IMO (independent medical opinion) and also flagged my TBI and major depression for higher evaluation and entitlement. I had a C&P for both of these months ago, plus many pages from C file and from tricare to support my claim.  

    

My questions are:  

-  I though you had to appeal to have your case reviewed by the higher level evaluation. I submitted the claim, evidence, and C&P and they moved it to higher evaluation on their own.  

-They also requested their own IMO following the C&P for TBI, is this bad or normal?

 

The VA rep told me that the 0% rating is a place holder stating that it is service connected while it is undergoing higher evaluation and not to worry, but all I can do is worry.     

 

 

  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1
  • Moderator
15 hours ago, yanrogue said:

The VA rep told me that the 0% rating is a place holder stating that it is service connected while it is undergoing higher evaluation and not to worry, but all I can do is worry.     

 

There is quite a bit of information here, just because your claim is deferred it does not mean it is a bad thing, actually if you think about it, it is a lot better then VA granting your claim and leaving it at 0%.  Because your claim has been deferred, VA is asking for more information/evidence. This information/evidence does not necessarily have to come from you but a medical opinion and or a medical rationale. VA is supposed to rate the veterans’ claim with the highest rating possible.

There are no set standards with VA and what one VA will grant another may not, but it is common for VA to combine a TBI Rating with a Mental Health Rating, but these ratings can be rated separately. It all boils down to the facts that if and I say if the medical examiner is willing to separate the onset and description of how your symptoms began/developed.

By VA already granting you a 0 % service connection is a big hurdle to overcome, I would say that it is at least 75% percent of the battle. Now VA is trying to determine to either grant you a combined rating or separate your ratings and go from there. Either way if you disagree with their decision you can always file a timely appeal (NOD) NOTICE OF DISAGREEMENT.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1
  • Adminstrator

I would not worry yet.  This is normal for the VA.  Just need to wait and see what they say to do.  If there is need they will contact you, but just be honest in you C&P or IMO.  Too often we tend to suck things up and not share the truth.  Now is not the time to do this.  

It is hard to hurry up and wait, but that is what they do.

Just be patient and share what they give you so we can help navigate these waters.  We got your back!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

This is normal.  They are trying to determine what symptoms of your tbi overlap with your mdd.  Or ptsd in my case.  I had two outside ime's, then the VA put me through the wringer with their own.  5 total c&p's for tbi and ptsd.  I had a bad c&p examiner for one of the ptsd.  She stated I was an unreliable reporter (in other words, a liar. Even with overwhelming evidence).  This set me back quite a few months.  When I got my C-file, they had two Psyc. Dr's (which I never saw) fighting it out over the bad c&p exam.  One Dr. sided with the unreliable reporter c&p exam, the other Dr. siding with the four favorable c&p exams.  In the end they determined the bad c&p examiner as being the unreliable reporter and not making any sense. I hope they fired her ass.

So you never know what they are trying to determine.  But I would say they are trying to get it right.  They got mine right.  100% P&T ptsd/tbi combined after the dust settled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Found out an update from QTC: They differed my mental health back to the first doctor that had a very long C&P session with me and she is going to also be the same one to write the IMO opinion for the VA. She was a really kind doctor and I'm hopeful and less stressed out knowing that she is also going to conduct the IMO for the report.  The TBI is deferred to the higher graders so it feels like they are taking the claim more seriously. Once it all gets resolved I'll write down my whole process for here for others to search for and use in the future if they run into these things. 

Thanks again guys 

   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 12/5/2020 at 12:10 AM, yanrogue said:

Found out an update from QTC: They differed my mental health back to the first doctor that had a very long C&P session with me and she is going to also be the same one to write the IMO opinion for the VA. She was a really kind doctor and I'm hopeful and less stressed out knowing that she is also going to conduct the IMO for the report.  The TBI is deferred to the higher graders so it feels like they are taking the claim more seriously. Once it all gets resolved I'll write down my whole process for here for others to search for and use in the future if they run into these things. 

Thanks again guys 

   

 

Any updates on a decision? I’m in the same boat and was curious on how yours turned out….thanks in advance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use