Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

? Can a veteran refuse the duty to assist.

Rate this question


Mr cue

Question

Ok I can't find anywhere  a law on comp exams.

When is it to many.

When can a veteran say I have enough evidence. I don't need anymore assistance.

To me the comp exam system is open door.

If they don't feel like address the case order more exams.

If you have enough evidence to granted they still can order more exams

They can keep say the exam is inadequate even when the exam is favorable to the veteran.

So when can a veteran stop all this is my ? There are not even laws addressing this smh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Ok if a veteran has had let say 4-5 exams.

And there favorable to the veteran and they va keep saying they are inadequate for rating purposes.

The doctor did say this the doctor didn't explain his opinion etc.

All the things the va use to keep ordering exams.

First it if a veteran refuse a exam they denied it.

Now they send it to a rater if a veteran refuse a exam.

See the confusion.

The court need to address this

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The VA can't just say an exam is inadequate- favorability has nothing to do with it. An exam is inadequate if the doctor doesn't answer the questions, or doesn't answer them with rationale. That's it. Problem is that what veteran's sometimes think is adequate rationale isn't based on the ratings schedule, or in some cases is worded in such a way that its unclear if the doctor is saying its favorable or not. This goes for private C&Ps, too. OR the lay statements of the veteran, their doctor's nexus, don't align with what is in the existing VAMC treatment records or STRs, etc. Ive got records of my own where a doctor says something that sounds favorable in one paragraph, but in medical-ese it means the opposite. There are some online dictionaries around for medical terminology- skim through them when reading your records. It helps a lot. 

I can usually spot these, where a doc somewhere else does an exam IMO having never seen the veteran or a bunch of stuff in the existing records and then writes up an opinion that isn't congruent with other evidence. This is why all you guys/gals need to download your VAMC medical from MyHealthVet or get them for a date-range from Release of records. That way your doctor isn't lying on the form at the top where it says "ive reviewed the veterans X,Y,Z records. 

Ive sent claims to rating where the veteran refused exams that were still granted claims. So long as I can annotate enough existing evidence in the existing record I send it. I dont get too hung up on if it will get deferred back to me for needing an exam (lost accuracy points for me) because 1. I'm pretty good at arguing my case, I did this for myself and others for years before working at VA, and 2. because if its deferred for needing an exam the Rater has to cite why with a reference to M 21-1 which means that I learn something that I didnt know to apply to the next one. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

So like I said is up to the person who processing the claim. If a exam is inadequate

If they keep are going to keep ordering exams.

So it a judgement call for them.

Like I said one min it is if you refuse there exam after they order exams they will denied your claim.

And not address it.

Now it's we can send it to a rater.

And no one can see the problem here smh.

Like I said I will be adding this to my appeal to court.

I have been send to 9 comp exam claim has been differ two times.

And remand by the court and they still trying to order exams.

When does it end.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

No, nothing has changed. You can refuse an exam. They can schedule them, you refuse enough times then your claim goes to rating. If there is not enough credible evidence it gets denied. If there is, its granted. I'm not sure where you see that some shift in policy has occurred. Inadequate exams are defined in M21-1, also.

Raters, and the number of claims they have, rate, complete, or kick back, are all evaluated also. Its not just my decision or the rater's decision. Its not different than any other office where someone- bank lender, insurance determination, whatever operate. At some point someone makes a decision. Sometimes you aren't going to like that decision. If the examiners do not answer the ratings questions correctly or write something that is conflicting then yes, its going to get sent back. An insurance company would do the same thing. This is not unique to just the VA. 

 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for the info.

The va isn't a insurance company so I don't think that will help a veteran.

I understand some ppl feel the va follow the law. I am not one of them.

So to tell me that the va need 9 comp exams for the same condition.

Make no sense and I am been told that they can do that so I should relax. Lol..

Like I said it's a judgement call.

If the claim will be process or denied because the veteran refuse there exam.

I have seen to many decisions the veteran miss exam denied. Veteran denied exam denied.

There is no evidence use in these.

So they were not process because of the exam.

Last you stated you send them to the rater there is no rule or law.

So this doesn't mean everbody does this 

So that is a judgement call also.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for the info.

The va isn't a insurance company so I don't think that will help a veteran.

I understand some ppl feel the va follow the law. I am not one of them.

So to tell me that the va need 9 comp exams for the same condition.

Make no sense and I am been told that they can do that so I should relax. Lol..

Like I said it's a judgement call.

If the claim will be process or denied because the veteran refuse there exam.

I have seen to many decisions the veteran miss exam denied. Veteran denied exam denied.

There is no evidence use in these.

So they were not process because of the exam.

Last you stated you send them to the rater there is no rule or law.

So this doesn't mean everbody does this 

So that is a judgement call also.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for the info.

The va isn't a insurance company so I don't think that will help a veteran.

I understand some ppl feel the va follow the law. I am not one of them.

So to tell me that the va need 9 comp exams for the same condition.

Make no sense and I am been told that they can do that so I should relax. Lol..

Like I said it's a judgement call.

If the claim will be process or denied because the veteran refuse there exam.

I have seen to many decisions the veteran miss exam denied. Veteran denied exam denied.

There is no evidence use in these.

So they were not process because of the exam.

Last you stated you send them to the rater there is no rule or law.

So this doesn't mean everbody does this 

So that is a judgement call also.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use