Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Got C And P Exam Results For Ibs

Rate this question


Guest jangrin

Question

Guest jangrin

Any comments would be appreciated about this C&P exam, thanks:

Opinion:

Veteran does not have the typical pattern of Irratible Bowel. He deveoped diarrhea upon the initiation of Metformin (he could not make the connection, although he states he told his MD Diarrhea began when medication for diabestes was began and that his MD took a BM sample). He's had no work up for diarrhea, of course the simpliest way to know what's cause diarrhea is to stop the Metformin which is commonly complicated with diarrhea.

Veterans diarrhea (not IBS) is less likely than not related to Diabetes Mellitus, as likely as not related to Metformin.

________________________________________________________________________________

____

When my husband filed the claim he filed for:

Gastrointestinal /diarrhea due to adverse effects of medication

The VA changed it to IBS

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I assume that the claim was denied. I also assume that the medical treatment and metformin is by the VA. (I take the same drug, but it was prescribed by my private doctor, not the VA). Since the VA changed the complaint to IBS, The VA reply (I believe) should be NOD'd, and the original claim reinstated. The experts on this forum should be able to tell you more than I can. The problem as I see it is that IBS is compensatable, and drug adverse reaction is not of itself likely compensatable, unless some long term or irreversable harm to the patient occurs. So changing the complaint to IBS was an attempt to move the problem to the nearest compensatable area, and the VA's take on the doctors opinion prevented successful award. Saying the patient does not have the "typical pattern" does not say that he does not have "IBS".

http://www.medicinenet.com/metformin/article.htm

Metformin

SIDE EFFECTS: The most common side effects with metformin are nausea, vomiting, gas, bloating, diarrhea and loss of appetite. These symptoms occur in one out of every three patients. These side effects may be severe enough to cause therapy to be discontinued in one out of every 20 patients. These side effects are related to the dose of the medication and may decrease if the dose is reduced.

DRUG INTERACTIONS: Cimetidine (Tagamet), by decreasing the elimination of metformin from the body, can increase the amount of metformin in the blood by 40%. This may increase the frequency of side effects from metformin.

There are other drugs than can be used instead of Metformin, or with a reduced dose of Metformin.

If the VA is providing medical treatment, why haven't they provided alternate therapy? Not doing so may open up another avenue for a claim.

Any comments would be appreciated about this C&P exam, thanks:

Opinion:

Veteran does not have the typical pattern of Irratible Bowel. He deveoped diarrhea upon the initiation of Metformin (he could not make the connection, although he states he told his MD Diarrhea began when medication for diabestes was began and that his MD took a BM sample). He's had no work up for diarrhea, of course the simpliest way to know what's cause diarrhea is to stop the Metformin which is commonly complicated with diarrhea.

Veterans diarrhea (not IBS) is less likely than not related to Diabetes Mellitus, as likely as not related to Metformin.

________________________________________________________________________________

____

When my husband filed the claim he filed for:

Gastrointestinal /diarrhea due to adverse effects of medication

The VA changed it to IBS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin

Chuck75,

Thanks for the imput-this was a recent C&P exam and report that the VA just did-no decision on award as yet-based on this report we suspect that the VA will defer a compensation decision until they get more recent medical records and treatment records addressing the side effect issue and possible change of medication.

This was one issue regarding a claim for multiple physical/mental issues. I am sure once we get any type of inital rating

from the VARO we will be filing multiple NODs. Your commentws have given some direction for the future. Thanks!!

Jangrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 2 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use