Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I think I have a CUE but unsure how to proceed.

Rate this question


spazbototto

Question

I was service connected for Herpes simplex dermatitis in 2022 for 10%, after reading the decision letter & CFR I was very confused on the diagnosis they gave (erythema multiform) and requested my C-File right away. After receiving the C-File the skin DBQ the Dr. never checked erythema multiform and the ICD10 code he used was herpes simplex virus unspecified. So, I did some more digging, in my research it appears the rater was using an old policy prior to 2018 and coded this as 7899-7827 opposed to what it should have been coded as under the general rating for skin and given a rating of 60%. Further, the rater didn't even use the skin DBQ or IMO! As that was not listed in the decision letter-only the appointment with the optometrist (which was another C&P exam the following week). 

I submitted a Higher-Level Review in July 2023 stating I was not submitting new evidence and explained the issue (via a 4138) that the coding is incorrect per the CFR and the favorable exam, waited over a year and the HLR was “confirmed and continued” (this time they did list the skin exam as evidence so I knew they had it) -they also did not accept my statement and labeled it "new evidence". I immediately opened a supplemental stating the same information and they sent me to a un-needed skin exam yesterday. When I got the exam notification, I submitted a compliant thru the white house hotline and given a case number and suspense date of September 20th but I do not have faith its going to be corrected. 

I was thinking about requesting a hearing for the supplemental next week if the Whitehouse hotline complaint is not updated but given how long it took for the HLR to amount to nothing I fear maybe someone somewhere will read and correct the issue and the hearing will just delay the issue further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

§ 20.1403 Rule 1403. What constitutes clear and unmistakable error; what does not.

38 CFR § 20.1403 Rule 1403. What constitutes clear and unmistakable error; what does not - Code of Federal Regulations (ecfr.io)

 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

It would take a full review of your file to know if there were CUE error(s).  

Generally, CUE is for Veterans who "did not" appeal within the required 1 year appeal period.  It sounds like you did appeal, and your claim has been "continiously prosecuted".  That is, your appeal is pending, but Im not so sure about that, again, as I have not reviewed your file.  

I dont recommend people "make" the "standard of review" more onerous, that is, file Cue if you are within the appeal period and can generally file an appeal.  The standard of review "is much higher" for you to meet with CUE, than with a "regular" appeal.  That is, it makes it more difficult for yourself.  

My recommendation is you appeal the denial of your HLR to the BVA.  

Yes, I know.  No one wants to go to the BVA as it takes several years.  I dont like it either.  Not going to the BVA, reminds me of a story, years ago.  

I was working for a company which sold janitorial supplies to companies, when a customer called in asking to speak for his representative.  It just so happened the company rep who makes the wax we sell was there to help train me.  

So, when the cutomer called about the wax problem, we were sent together.  

The customer immeditately attacked us, saying the wax was "no good" and he demanded action.  

The rep quietly asked, "How did you apply the wax?  Did you read the directions?"

"Oh heck no..I dont have time for that.  I just poured it on with a mop, and THIS (pointing to a rather ugly floor) is what happened!!!

I understand.  The directions point out you must remove all the old wax, and grease, before applying new wax.  Did you do that?  

"Who has time for that?" WAS THE RESPONSE.  

Then he said something I wont soon forget

Quote

If you dont have time to do it right the first time, when will you have time to do it over?

I dont care what brand of wax, or paint, if you put it over old, greasy walls or floors, without paint or wax prep, you are not gonna get a good result.  

The customer "did the job over", right that time, by first carefully stripping off the old wax and grease, then applying the wax, buffing, more wax, buff again, to get a great looking floor.  

Short cutting the BVA rarely works well.  If you dig deeply in the BVA chairmans report, you will see that about 80 percent of Veterans claims which reach the BVA, are either awarded or remanded.  (Depending on the representative, a statistic, I dont think VA keeps anymore).  https://www.bva.va.gov/Chairman_Annual_Rpts.asp

Yes, some people get benefits with a HLR, but most of us eventually get benefits awarded at the BVA level.  I did with mine..all of them.  Some people who just waxed their floors 2 months ago, get away without stripping them down also, but grungy dirty, with old wax have to be stripped first.  

My advice is to appeal to the BVA, if you are in the appeal period.  

Now, on to CUE question.  

Mostly, a C and P exam you disagree with. is not CUE.  The only real way to refute a bad exam is with another exam by a competent examiner.  Neither your opinion, nor my opinion, nor the opinion of Joe Biden "trumps" that of a medical examiner.  YOu have to have MEDICAL evidence to win claims.  And neither your opinion, nor my opinion is medical evidence, that is, unless you are a competent qualified medical professional.  (aka doctor)..  

Of course, I am sure you are not pleased to hear this.  But, until you get competent medical evidence, probably before the BVA, you are unlikely to win your claim.  Medical evidence wins claims, while most other stuff rarely does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Ok.  The sooner you appeal, the sooner it likely will come back.  It often takes months and months to get a copy of your cfile, so the sooner you ask for that, too, the better.  

"If" you have a VSO (with VBMS access) or attorney, you can ask them, they may be willing to give you a cd rom of your cfile.  check to see if you have all Caluza elements, you will need to get those, too.  

This sometimes requires buddy letters, and/or an independent medical opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Community Owner

I would ask for an in-person hearing at the RO. There is plenty of BVA cases out there that state the RO has to give you a hearing if you request it. I would point out via the record you have the error. I would also file a BVA appeal before your one-year time limit runs out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
    • karlduerr earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use