Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How To Rate Non-service ?

Rate this question


Winvet234

Question

user-online.pngWinvet234 <script type=text/javascript> ipsmenu.register( "post-member-2359", '', 'popmenubutton-new', 'popmenubutton-new-out' ); How to rate non-service?, Today, 12:19 PM

pip.gif

spacer.gif

I'm doing all this for my husband and haven't got a lot of help from his DAV rep. My husband is paranoid schzophrenic and suffers with severe tinnitis. He receives 10% for the tinnitis, but have not been able to locate records about treatment for mental problems while in service. As the tinnitis worsened, his mental state went completely downhill. He has been thru the hearing with the BVA and was approved. But when he got the letter in Aug. of last year, they decided in Oct. of last year to reexamine his mental state. Despite many letter letters from psychytrist and hospitalized twice at VA, and testimony thru the hearings, they came back this month with a 10% rating for the mental condition aggravating the tinnitis.

However, the GAF rating by the examiner in Oct last year gave him a 40 rating in functioning. Then they said he was totally unable to work and would be this way even if there was no tinnitis. So it's like saying regardless if you didn't have tinnitis,you are still unable to work and contends that the rating of 10% effect was warranted and that they were liberal in giving the rating.

They are proposing that he be unable to handle his affairs and needs to be declared imcompetent. They want him to decide who would he want to handle his affairs. Which I have for the last 40 years. But my question is this: how can you declare someone incompetent and rate him with 10% for the mental Disability.?

It's like they ignored what his psychrist letters say and other doctors. How would the 40 Gaf rating chive with 10%? He does receive 10% for tinnitis and 10% skin problems.

In my research of the 38 CFR, I used 4.130, 4.126. and (3.3l0 for non-service condition that aggravates his service connected illness). When I go to the 4.130, it shows 100%, 70%, 60% and 30%. when I look at the symptoms, he has all but very few. What do they use to rate with? I know there's another complicated one to come up with a combined one, but I fail to see how this would apply. Sorry to be so long winded, but need some help in understanding how they rate. I have gotten very little help from DAV, First the first rep. that we had went somewhere else, and the one who we can't get our calls returned back. It's frustrating and he has been unemployed for 10 years.He left civil service because of functions being eliminated in his company.He fits totally the symptoms for the mental illness, but he tried very hard to not show it in the army and when he worked in civil service. He mostly stayed to himself, done his job, had no friends, is a loner.But the real stressors really affects him.Is it worth trying to fight this anymore? His claim is now going on 6 years. They make you feel when they interview you that things are looking good and they will do all they can when they examine you, but then when it come back, it was a surprise. The first DAV rep. said he couldn't see why they couldn't rate him any less than 100% disability. When we first started out, I was handling it all and then and was using the mental illness claim as service connected, but the DAV rep. said it was best to do the claim as non-service connected with aggravating circumstances to the already service connected tinnitis.

Anyway. Anybody out there had simlar problems? Would appreciate any ideas if we should fight this thing or what. My husband gave the service 9 years. 1 in Vietnam and 1 in Korea. During those days you didn't dare admit that you had a mental problem. But as his wife of 40 years, I know him his long history. I picked up on right after he returned from Nam. Any suggestions are appreciated. There are some great educational issues on this site. Thank God. will accept emails.maylincar23@yahoo.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Could it be the VA is saying he has NSC schizophrenia rated as aggravated by the tinnitus-only to degree of 10% -yet his schizophrenia -other than the secondary rating -is still NSC? YES THEY ARE CONSIDERING THE SCHIZOPHRENIA AS NSC. HE WENT TO THE DOCTOR IN 1971 IN KOREA BECAUSE OF HIS NERVES, BUT THEY COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING IN HIS SERVICE RECORDS.

"Then they said he was totally unable to work and would be this way even if there was no tinnitis. So it's like saying regardless if you didn't have tinnitis,you are still unable to work and contends that the rating of 10% effect was warranted and that they were liberal in giving the rating."

Because they are saying the mental disorder is NSC-and remains NSC- that is my take on it- THAT'S THE WAY IT SOUNDS IN THE BVA LETTER.

'It's like they ignored what his psychrist letters say and other doctors"

Does he have mental health issues or treatment for anything at all like that in his SMRs? How about his service personnel records- any bad paper stuff like discipline problems that could have been symptomatic of the Schizophrenia? WHEN I TRIED TO GET HIS MEDICAL RECORDS IN ST. LOUIS, THEY COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING RELATED TO MENTAL. IS THE SERVICE PERSONNEL RECORDS A SEPARATE FILE? HE HASN'T SEEN THE FULL FILE SINCE HE PUT IN HIS CLAIM IN 2001. I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY DISCIPLINE PROBLEMS. HE WAS PRETTY MUCH A LONER AND WANTED TO STAY IN THE SERVICE AND GOT OUT ONCE, THEN WENT BACK IN, SO HE HAS A TOTAL OF 9 YEARS.

Did the doctors make any statements as to a potential service nexus for

his schizophrenia? I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND WHAT NEXUS IS, BUT THE DOCTORS WHO TREATED HIM IN 2000 WHILE HE WAS HOSPITALIZED ON TWO OCCASIONS CONFIRMED THE MENTAL ILLNESS.

If the SC tinnitus was the sole etiology or cause of his schizophrenia and he cannot work due to it-then I think he should have higher rating for the schizophrenia. WHEN HE GOT OUT OF THE SERVICE HE WORKED IN CIVIL SERVICE UNTIL THEY STARTED CLOSING/ELIMINATING FUNCTIONS OR TRANSFERRING FUNCTIONS. WHILE IN CIVIL SERVICE, THE TINNITIS GOT SO MUCH WORSE, THEN IT MADE HIS MENTAL ILLNESS A LOT WORSE. I HAVE NO DOUBT AT ALL THAT THE TINNITIS AGGRAVATED HIS MENTAL ILLNESS TO THE POINT THAT HE HASN'T WORKED IN 10 YEARS. HE WAS NEVER THE SAME AFTER HE CAME HOME FROM VIETNAM, BUT HE JUST LIVED WITH IT AND WOULDN'T GET TREATED. I SUPPOSE AS HE GOT MUCH OLDER THAN HIS DISEASE WORSENED OR AT LEAST THAT'S THE WAY IT ENDED UP.

They seem to have rated an affect of SC to NSC condition.

Does the tinnitus make any audial hallucinations worse then they are? HE'S SUFFERED SEVERE HALLUCINATIONS UNTIL THEY GOT HIM ON MEDICINE, BUT HE'S STILL VERY PARANOID AND VERY HARD TO DEAL WITH.

VA says the affect is only 10%- medical evidence might well show more then that-were these private IMos? YES, HE SUBMITTED LETTERS FROM HIS PRIVATE PSYCHYRIST AND THERE ARE LETTERS IN HIS RECORDS SUPPOSEDLY FROM HIS VA DOCTORS WHO TREATED HIM WHILE IN THE VA HOSP.

Would they be willing to write updated IMOs? YES, HE HAS UPDATE LETTERS. HE WAS REEXAMINED TWO OR THREE TIMES , TWO OF WHICH WERE AFTER THE BVA APPROVAL.

But better yet- is there any way at all he can find a nexus or link to his service-that would show his schizophrenia is due to service as well as SC tinnitus? I WISH I HAD KEPT ALL OF HIS LETTERS THAT HE WROTE ME WHILE IN VIETNAM AND KOREA. I COULD TELL THAT HE WAS EXTREMELY STRESSED, BUT HE NEVER TOLD ME ABOUT AN INCIDENT THAT HAPPENED IN KOREA THAT CAUSED HIM TO SEEK MEDICAL HELP FOR HIS NERVES UNTIL YEARS LATER HIS BROTHER ASK ME IF I KNEW ABOUT IT, WHICH I DIDN'T. HE HID A LOT OF HIS PROBLEMS, BUT I COULD TELL SOMETHING WASN'T RIGHT WITH HIM. I TESTIFIED TO THAT, BUT DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH THEY BELIEVED.

I APPRECIATE YOUR INTEREST, BERTHA, LOOKS LIKE YOU AND OTHERS HAVE A LOT OF KNOWLEDGE IN THIS. THANKS AGAIN. WINVET234

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The BVA web site has been down -hopefully they are adding the first quarter of 2007 cases-

I havent found the case yet that you mentioned-

The nexus- what I mean is the proof -inservice and cocumented- that your husband exhibited manifestations of schizophrenia.

This is way I asked about discipline records- decades ago if a service person exhibited a mental disorder they were often written up or thrown into a stockade or a brig-for irratic behavior that could well have been inservice mental disorder.

If the SMRs and all personnel reocrds do not reveal anything that wouls show symptoms of schizophrenia -he will need a buddy statement- an eyewitness account that he exhibited symptoms of this disability- inservice.

The VA can help vets find buddys-if the buddy is in the VA health care system-

with a letter telling the VARO who you are looking for and when and where they served with you-

and with a stamped self addressed envelop enclosed-also with you husbands name on it-

he can write a brief letter to the veteran, telling them how to contact him and the VA-if this vet can be found in their data base-

will forward your husbands letter-

it is up to the vet he is trying to find to contact him-

also many Units- especially Vietnam units-and Korean War vets have web sites-

The Korean War Project is one of the best

He will have to determine where and when he could have exhibited symptoms of schizophrenia and then try to contact a buddy via VA and also through these web sites- regarding his unit.

If he had any medical attention at all for schizophrenia in service he needs to do all he can to find those records.

I dont know what branch he was in -but if Navy or Marine Corps-

they should have sent from St Louis his SRB-Service Record Book-

with the SRB and especially the SMRs-there could well be someone whose name would ring a bell with him and he could attempt to find them-

I would start with his company commanders.

He has to be specific as to what he whats them to be eyewitness of-

he has to define specific incidents such as any medical care at all from any corpsman, hospital, MASH- etc-

or any incident -inservice- of unusual behavior that could have been symptomatic of his present disability.

This is the nexus-

the proof of his claim as it is the proof that his service experience

contained the cause of his present disability.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS- forgot to add- you said "THEY" are saying there is nothing in his SMRs.

If "they" is the VA -I never buy that-

I found in some local vets SMRs exactly what the VA said was Not there---

the Nexus they needed to their service.

A vet should get the SMRs themselves and go over them very carefully.

They might have to be blown up on the PC and I have even read some SMRs using a mirror to decifer what they said-

If you find nothing in them to help= that is one thing-

I never believe it if the VA says that.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 1 reply
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use