Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pre-programmed “false Statements” On Veterans’ Va “medical Record Progress Notes”

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

fwd....

PRE-PROGRAMMED “FALSE STATEMENTS” ON VETERANS’ VA “MEDICAL RECORD PROGRESS NOTES”

ARE OR COULD BE USED TO “DENY” THEIR VA CLAIMS

“PRE-PROGRAMMED FALSE STATEMENTS” on Veterans computerized “Medical Record Progress Notes” that are intentionally or unintentionally not corrected to describe the Veteran-patient’s true medical condition or its “residuals,” are or could be used as a “bases to deny” Veterans’ service-connected and non-service connected disability claims, federal tort claims, and social security disability insurance claims, among other things.

“FALSE STATEMENTS” ARE A VIOLATION OF:

TITLE 18> PART 1 > CHAPTER 47 >

SECTION 1035, ET SEQ., AMONG OTHER THINGS.

Below are samples of “Pre-Programmed” statements that you will find on your “Medical Record Progress Notes” that may or may not be accurate. The ones highlighted, if not accurate, are the ones most likely to cause your claims to be “denied.”

So after reading the information below, whether you have a pending VA or other Government Disability claim or not, be sure to check all of your current and future VA medical records for accuracy… You can get a copy of any of your VA medical records from the “Release of Information” Office at the VA Medical Center where you receive treatment.

• This patient denies any other new medical problems.

• “The patient ‘DENIES’ both short-term and long term exercise intolerances.

• “The patient ‘DENIES’ profound muscle weakness, which unable him to raise his arm to comb hair, stand up from a chair or lift his head from a pillow, fascial rash, Gottron sign, v-sign, and shwal sign.”

• “The patient ‘DENIES’ LE claudication and foot drop.

• “The patient ‘DENIES’ symmetric polyarticular arthralgia/arthritis, malar rash, oral ulcer, discoid lesion, photosensitivity, nephritis, serositis, dry eyes and dry mouth, Raynaud’s phenomenon and sclerodactyly.

• There has been no persistent nausea, emesis, or diarrhea, no persistent fever or chills, no acute sino-bronchitic symptoms, no acute dyspnea, no hemoptsis, no recurrent GI or GU bleeding, no significant chest pain or unstable anginal episodes of concern to the patient, no persistent weight loss, no UTI symptoms, no synscope, no TIA episodes, no persistent irregular bowel movements, no persistent anorexia, and no unusual palpitations.

• The tests were reviewed with the patient.

• Otherwise the patient has no further medical complaints.

• Also the patient relays no new significant signs of symptoms referable to the ENT, Constitutional, pulmonary, cv, GI/GU or Neurological areas occurring since the last clinic visit.

Also Visit the following other Pre-Programmed Categories on your

VA “Medical Record Progress Notes” and check them for accuracy:

• Vital Signs, Reason for Visit, Pain Score, Allergies, Active Problems, Active Medications, Selected Medical History, Chief Complaint, History of Present Illness, Exam, Assessment, Mental Health Status, General appearance, Head/Neck, Eyes, Ears/Nose, Mouth, Chest/Breast, Lungs, Cardiac, Abdomen, Genitalia/Hernia, Rectal/Prostate, Back, Feet, Extremities, Skin, Lymphatics, Neurological/Psychiatric, Mobility, Activity Intolerance, Activity of daily living, Nutrition, Evidence of abuse or neglect, potential barriers, tobacco use, exercise, Contraindication to vigorous exercise, alcohol screening, PTSD Screen, PTSD Score, Mood Screen, Mood Score, Colorectal Screening, Vaccinations, Sun Protection, Hypertension, COPD, Diabetic Foot Examination, Plan, Active Medications.

TO READ

TITLE 18> PART 1 > CHAPTER 47 >

SECTION 1035, ET SEQ., AMONG OTHER THINGS

CLICK ONTO THE URL’S BELOW:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/us...35----000-.html

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/us...----000-.html#b

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Allan,

I think you posted something about this earlier, or maybe it was someone else, but......... it significant and SOMETHING needs to happen about it. There is also a VA "back-channel" message system that the veteran never sees, and to my kowlege cannot get a copy of. Its solely among the medical VAMC's though, not on the raters system.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hello Bob,

It will be interesting to see how the court views these records.

The VA, US Justice, etc. should be able to use undercover agents to investigate & prosecute NSO's, VA claims adjusters, contract adjusters, C&P examiners & VAMC health care staff, for fraudulent & unethical practices.

Once they do the stake outs for six months or so, with out anyone being aware of it, they will end up saving the tax payers a load in retirement benefits for crooked federal employees. Who knows? Maybe they've been investigating for six months already & they're about to make the sting.

Wishful thinking?

Maybe.................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Are they saying that if a Veteran denies a condition that they consider it a false statement? This is very perplexing.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hello Pete,

whats fraud to me is,

when my provider wrote in my progress notes, that I "refused" long acting pain medication, than he refused to prescribe any pain meds for nearly six months.

When another wrote, (after reviewing a great deal of smr's & information from the DOD website), concerning project shad & the USS Twining; the only thing my service meedical records,(SMR"s) showed I had wrong with me was jock itch.

wHen the VARO stated they never recieved a favorable VAMC C&P examination & medical opinion, than denied the claim after getting what they wanted from a contract consultant.

Also had a comment show up in one C&P examiners remarks, that really pissed me off. They denied my NSC pension claim over it. He supposedly remarked that he smelled alchohol on me & my clothing at this, 8am C&P examination, 150 miles from home, with two children & my wife in a 62 chevy 3/4 ton truck on icy roads.

The examination was for "neuromuscular disorder of unknown cause"-probably multtiple sclerosis.

They must have thought it was a good way to explain why & slurred my words, staggered & had vertigo. Didn't work, but they tried anyway.

the list goes on & on..........

Edited by allan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Allan,

I slurred my words, staggered and had mild dizzyness for a year and a half. For the first three months the doctors at the VA told me they had no idea what was causing it. Eventually, I saw a VA doctor who told me all the doctors who had been treating me were absolutely under-diagnosing my problem and failed to schedule the proper tests to determine the cause of the symptoms. She was really pissed that I had been to neurology and they did not do an MRI on my neck. She called a PA into the office and told her to go with me to the neruology clinic and make sure they did not weasle out of scheduling the MRI on my neck. After taking a comprehensive history and getting the MRI results she attributed all the symptoms to cervical degenerative disc disease.

If you look at the literature you will find that herniated cervical discs can cause all of the symptoms you listed. It is all medical politics if you ask me. The doctors who are on the side of the patient will schedule the tests and make the diagnoses. The doctors who are trying to save the Govt. some money play dumb and do not schedule tests.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting Info----

and this is why every vet should pour over their med recs-

I used to support my AO death claim-various VA med recs that showed VA was close to diagnosis of Diabetes in my husband- but failed to diagnose it at all.

The sole VA doctor who wanted to diagnose diabetes was overruled-

Twelve years later (It took time to find him in private practice now on the west coast)-he gave me a brief IMO that Dr. Bash incorporated into his main IMO.

Another doctor in the med recs had written the symbol for an arrow pointing left and then DVD-upon Rods admission to the SYracuse VA.

They had not seen his med recs yet- and they assumed that anyone with a catastrophic stroke like his, must have had diabetes as the probable cause-

I used LexisMedicon and Merck-2 publications that VA uses also-

to find out that the symbols meant -history of Diabetic Vascular Disease.

A VA expert doctor tried to say that I was wrong and that the symbols meant the patient "Denied Venereal Disease"

yeah right-

I rebutted with the actual printouts from Lexis medicon and Merck and stated that

these are the same medical dictionarys that caused me to win my FTCA wrongful claim.

In 1988 a med cert said RO/CAD-

I didnt know what that meant as they had treated the veteran with sudafed when he collapsed while at work at the VA one day.

EKG results the same day -hard to interpret-until I got some cardio medical books-revealed that Rod had an abnormal cardiac event- then another entry stated WU for CAD.Also it took me quite some time to understand an entry at to diaporetic.

Long story-but

I won wrongful death claim based on these records that fully supported the veteran had been misdiagnosed, had a heart attack that day, received counterproductive meds (sudafed) and the VA had failed to WU -work up- and then RO rule out CAD-cardiovascular disease.

VA doctors attempted for 3 years to deny the Sec 1151 claim that was filed with the FTCA- by trying to say what the med recs said was NOT what they really said-

It certainly pays to read and read and then read again what you med recs have in them-for any disability----

because what you need might be in them but if the VA is interpreting it all to go against the claim ---- they might be quite wrong.

In those days I had to obtain medical texts myself-these days the internet has made this info mere clicks away-

The most obscure symbol or entry in your med records can have a potential benefit to your claim.

Of course a good IMO doctor finds all that- but vets can do by fully reading their med recs and looking up whatever they dont understand-

or even asking the VA doctor.

I was able to get an entire entry page typed from handwritten notes that were completly illegible-by a VA doctor.

The results on that were very alarming.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use