Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Imo Help!

Rate this question


Guest terrysturgis

Question

Guest terrysturgis

This is what I came up with to help my private MD get me an IMO. If anyone has any suggestions, please help.

November __, 2005

RE: Terry Sturgis, CLAIM XX-XXX-XXX

Dear Chris _____ DAV SO,

Terry has been diagnosed wuth Diabetes Mellitus for four years. He has been Service Connected for the DMII and lower body bilaterial Peripheral Neuropathy for three years.

Patient has now developed upper body bilaterial Peripheral Neuropathy.

His muscle power and tone are reduced in both hands (as diagnosed by Veterans Administration Doctor Mohammed Mohiuddin, MD during an Agent Orange physical performed on 07/13/2005). Copy enclosed.

Having treated many Diabetics for ____ years I conclude that this patient has developed bilaterial upper body Peripheral Neuropathy as a secondary condition to DMII.

Respectfully,

Ken _____, MD

HADIT FOLKS, is this letter OK and am I missing anything. THANKS, Terry Sturgis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Yeah -his Curriculum Vitae IS impressive- I sent it all to VA with his IMO- maybe they at VA are jealous and that is why they ignore the IMO--

Yes- you gave great advise Jangrin-

I sent Dr. Bash everything he needed but summarized it all-

it was tabbed too so he knew what to look for where-

it involved the med recs but also past SSOCs and the FTCA stuff.He had a lot to go through and looked at it all.

It does pay to be specific- I had to briefly tell the whole story-about this negligence etc- but the med evidence of DMII was clearly there in the med recs-

I have heard from vets at hadit in the past via email blaming me for IMOs from him that they did not like- this only happened about three four times-but this is very upsetting to me- as -since each vet sent me the IMO attached to the email- their was nothing wrong with Craig's findings at all!

Two fully supported the claims, one supported A & A for vet spouse of a vet with 100%PTSD(that vet wanted 100%SC for stuff he did not have) and the other one- didn't support one of the vet's claims, but did support another one medically.

One local vet wanted my financial assurance that a Bash opinion would help him-

yeah right- he had a good claim and they did award it- but this is unfair to ask of anyone-his own Medicare doc gave him a free IMO.

Again -Dr. Bash cannot perform a miracle. If there is no service nexus he cannot invent one.

If there is no medical evidence to lend him to a more than likely or likely as not statement-

he cannot ethically write an IMO that is wrong.

For the vet who lurks here and is really ticked at him- he is not my 'boy'-he is my honey!

You are right Jangrin-seriously - he needs it all and it sure helps to send it to him in an appropriate order too.

I have seen vet records and also claims that look like doilys.

I have seen piles of stuff in boxes that vets actually thought I would straighten out for them-

no way-

If it can all be sent in the same order as the records accumulate, at the VA-with a brief summary, and specific references to the med recs by date, and any other info he should have from anywhere else- this sure helps to get an IMO that can help a claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

stevedenesha,

I never meant my initial post to be an ongoing discussion and I am sorry my post caused someone to question at length a comment I made. I just stated a fact. All I stated was that in the BVA decision letter, they granted "instant approvals" (their words, not mine) on a couple of my husbands claims. I in no way insinuated that we got the rating and compensation on that same day. The instant approval means that the BVA has approved the claim, therefore, the VARO only needs to rate the claim and send out the decision letter as there is no further action required on the part of the VARO. Maybe you have gotten approvals from the BVA which read different from what we received, but I only quoted what was in the decision letter we received. Yes, even though it reads "instant approval" the VARO has to still do the rating and send you the decision letter. And yes, this can take some time to get, depending on what VARO you are dealing with.

Sorry for my original post and the confusion I may have caused on this. I only thought my post and our experience that we went through might be helpful to someone. I guess I was wrong on this one.

mssoup1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DON20906

Dayam! $2 thousand? He certainly has gone up. I used him in a 2000 DIC appeal (won) and it included a rebuttal to a rebuttal IMO for $700. His claim then was he would follow the case to it's conclusion for the one fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use