Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
diabetes "boots-on-the-ground" Vietnam In-country Dva Policy/requirement For Ao Claims
Rate this question
-
Similar Content
-
diabetes I am seeking information concerning possible herbicide(s) stored, used and spilled on Asco 1 2
By Gopher,
- 9 answers
- 2,143 views
-
- 11 answers
- 3,107 views
-
Reopen Diabetes II or file secondary to Hypoythyroid
By L2dee2,
- diabetes
- diabetes secondary to hypothyroid
- (and 8 more)
- 5 answers
- 2,274 views
-
- 27 answers
- 16,056 views
-
Question
vietnam_war_vet
Last spring, I was rejected/denied for the 4th time by the DVA for my AO claim (I have chloracne and DMII diabetes). In 1990, the Boise VAMC took tissue samples from me during an AO screening and their doctors did find dioxin/AO in my fat tissue. I was then placed on the DVA's official Agent Orange registry, but in the same 1990 notification letter...the DVA refused to acknowledge or treat my chloracne -- even though the skin sores/lesions started during my second tour in 1972-73. The Boise VAMC doctors labeled it as a form of folliculitis (<--- spelling?) and not caused by AO exposure.
I served at Nankon Phanom Air Base (NKP) in northeasternmost Thailand (across the Mekong River from Laos). As required on occasion per Task Force Alpha, I went on interdiction missions into Laos along the Ho Chi Minh trail. The HCM trail was frequently/heavily defoliated with AO, plus the perimeter of NKP was AO defoliated. I watched the C-123s spray and knew enlisted personnel on the flightline who loaded the AO onto those planes. At our commander's meetings, we "enlisted" were told it was pesticide that was being sprayed around the base perimeter for mosquito control. How stupid did our officers think we were? After those sprayings, the mosquitoes continued to thrive, while all the plantlife died.
Back to my most recent denial: for this claim attempt - I had the DAV as my representative/service officer. The resulting DVA denial letter informed me that a review of my service records showed that I had not put "boots-on-the-ground" in-country Vietnam, therefore I was not eligible for my AO DMII claim or any other AO-related claim. My state DAV service officer then told me that I could appeal, but I would be wasting my time and everyone elses since I had not been within the borders of Vietnam proper.
I did a Google search plus a search on this forum's search engine and really didn't get any definitive insight on this "boots-on-the-ground" in-country service policy requirement for AO comp claims.
For my NKP/TFA tour, I was awarded the VSM, RVCR, and the AFCM.
On the Yahoo AO "Spring-Into-Action" forum, one of the moderators told me that former DVA Secretary Principi was responsible to this "boots-on-the-ground" in-country Vietnam policy and it was done to eliminate AO-exposed veterans like myself who served in Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand from qualifying for compensation claims....strictly a beancounting measure by Principi to reduce the number of compensated claims/awards. Is this true??
Any insight or feedback would be appreciated. -- Michael
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
7
3
1
1
Popular Days
Nov 29
6
Nov 28
4
Nov 25
3
Dec 10
2
Top Posters For This Question
vietnam_war_vet 7 posts
TinCanMan 3 posts
wallyg 1 post
jimlane1949 1 post
Popular Days
Nov 29 2005
6 posts
Nov 28 2005
4 posts
Nov 25 2005
3 posts
Dec 10 2005
2 posts
19 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now