Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Diabetes Claim -- Do I Have What I Need?

Rate this question


Dave

Question

To start, I am not a Vietnam Vet (so no Agent Orange presumption) and I was diagnosed with diabetes II outside of the 1 year window after retirement (27 months). I do have two high blood glucose readings -- 135 mg/dl from a fasting lab conducted by the VA for a Benefits Delivered at Discharge C&P during my last month of service. I only found out about these results 20 months after from a FOIA request. I have one other fasting reading of 115 from the military doctors a few months before the VA and the military doctor wrote "patient counseled on high blood glucose reading". My current diabetic doctor reviewed my military records and wrote "based on my review of the veteran's service records to include high fasting glucose readings, there is "no doubt" that his diabetes started in service." Now that I have a current DM II diagnosis, a record of 2 high readings during my last year of service and plus the doctors statement for nexus -- would this claim now be granted? I have a VSO helping me and I believe my doctors letter will help me establish direct service connection for DM II. Thoughts?

Thanks

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Sounds like you have a strong claim. Will it be granted? It SHOULD. But you never know about the VA. But your dots seem easy enough to connect, even for the simple minded. Hopefully you have enough to get the claim granted right off the bat.

Free

To start, I am not a Vietnam Vet (so no Agent Orange presumption) and I was diagnosed with diabetes II outside of the 1 year window after retirement (27 months). I do have two high blood glucose readings -- 135 mg/dl from a fasting lab conducted by the VA for a Benefits Delivered at Discharge C&P during my last month of service. I only found out about these results 20 months after from a FOIA request. I have one other fasting reading of 115 from the military doctors a few months before the VA and the military doctor wrote "patient counseled on high blood glucose reading". My current diabetic doctor reviewed my military records and wrote "based on my review of the veteran's service records to include high fasting glucose readings, there is "no doubt" that his diabetes started in service." Now that I have a current DM II diagnosis, a record of 2 high readings during my last year of service and plus the doctors statement for nexus -- would this claim now be granted? I have a VSO helping me and I believe my doctors letter will help me establish direct service connection for DM II. Thoughts?

Thanks

Dave

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have any compensable complications from Diabetes that should also be rated?

Free

7913 Diabetes mellitus

Requiring more than one daily injection of insulin, restricted diet,

and regulation of activities (avoidance of strenuous occupational

and recreational activities) with episodes of ketoacidosis or

hypoglycemic reactions requiring at least three hospitalizations per

year or weekly visits to a diabetic care provider, plus either

progressive loss of weight and strength or complications that

would be compensable if separately evaluated 100

Requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities with

episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions requiring one

or two hospitalizations per year or twice a month visits to a diabetic

care provider, plus complications that would not be compensable

if separately evaluated 60

Requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities 40

Requiring insulin and restricted diet, or; oral hypoglycemic agent

and restricted diet 20

Manageable by restricted diet only 10

Note (1): Evaluate compensable complications of diabetes separately unless they are part of the criteria used to support a 100 percent evaluation. Noncompensable complications are considered part of the diabetic process under diagnostic code 7913.

Note (2): When diabetes mellitus has been conclusively diagnosed, do not request a glucose tolerance test solely for rating purposes.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here is exactly what you need to do.

You must obtain a medical opinion from a Doctor who has reviewed the entire file and have the Doc say that the Earlier high Glucose readings were the Onset of your diabetes.

An opinion from a Diabetes Specialist would carry significant weight.

The onset is the Key.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My claim is based on high glucose readings too as well as countless other symptoms of diabetes-in my husband over a 6 year period.

I was able to find evidence in VA medical records within 6 years prior to his death to prove he had diabetes.

Diabetes can be symptomatic in other ways- he showed these symptoms at numerous ER vists yet no glucose readings were done.

The highest glucose reading he had were done while he was being hospitalized on a feed tube.

A VA doctor who opined on my claim based her opinions on the "outdated" ADA criteria as well as the fact she did not have the complete medical records.

I got 2 separate IM0s from Dr. BAsh with an attached brief statement from the sole VA doctor who wanted to rule out diabetes. They never did.

The VA might question those readings-but a solid IMO-which it appears you have -will put your claim into Relative Equipoise-

and it should succeed.

My IMOs have never been addressed by the VA yet-

WHat bothers me about these claims is that often the VA only takes periodic Glucose readings in veteran patients-

those readings can be early in the AM or after a vet has waited around for hours-without eating anything and they can be deceptive as a low reading when-in a few hours they could go up into a high level.

The HBIAC is usually a much better detector of DMII. They never gave Rod a HBIAC test nor a OGT test.

VA often doesnt even diagose diabetes until a vet has suffered a major complication from it such as heart attack or stroke.

VAs years ago considered glucose within high range at 105 in some VA's and at 110 in others-while that isnt too high, they are supposed to consider that with your creatine levels as well as your cholestrol counts.

Any red flags should trigger concern.

In Rods records his hyperlipedemia was noted (High TRgly/Low CHolestrol)and checked along with glucose readings-yet nothing else was done to rule in or rule out diabetes.

I think you have established yur inservice nexus and hope that VA does not question these readings.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VA rated me 20% for diabetes. My doctor wrote a great and true letter for me. Also, thanks also to you Berta for your advice.

Now I can continue to fight my diabetes and not worry about the rating anymore.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use