Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

They Reduced Me Anyways!

Rate this question


souldeliverer

Question

After my hard work in compiling evidence, the VA reduced my PTSD from 100% to 70%. If that wasn't enough, they also proposed to reduce my migraines from 30% to 10%!!! What is really going on at my RO? What should I do from here on out? Could this be age discrimination? Have I unwittingly made an enemy within the RO?

I am faxing and mailing my TDIU form tomorrow, and submitting a hearing request for the migraine reduction. Also, they are leaving my back comp at 10%, which I believe should be at least 30% for all the dang narcotics they have me on.

Can I submit an NOD for the PTSD reduction while simultaneously filing for TDIU???

Please look up my other posts for background info, or I can look them up if need be. I really need help with this one. I am getting jacked.

Please see: Had My Hearing For Ptsd Proposal To Reduce

Thank you all.

Edited by souldeliverer

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

-Patrick Henry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thank you for the heart-warming words. I guess I'll just keep fighting until the day my widow gets that letter?

Oh...by the way... I want to thank you for your service to our country.

The VA WILL thank you also - but it takes time. But when you die and they get to close your file, they send your widow a nice little certificate telling her they appreciated your service to our country.

Just figured you might want to hear it while you are still alive.

Free

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

-Patrick Henry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully you won't have to fight that long <_<

Hopefully you will get it resolved soon!!!

They actually sent me TWO copies of the letter for my husband.

I guess that makes up for two of the claims for burial benefits they have lost.

You are very smart. So are they. They just act like they are missing something.

A key I have found is look close and notice what they ignored - what they failed to address - the place in your claim that they AVOID holds a lot of keys.

Like Hoppy says, they try to put up a smoke screen - and pull you into arguing side issues - so you spend your time and enery fighting points that even if you win - won't matter.

Like a spider's sticky web.

Don't let them pull you into their sticky webs...

Keep on the webs that go straight to the point. (And they probably IGNORED the REAL point).

Free

Free

Thank you for the heart-warming words. I guess I'll just keep fighting until the day my widow gets that letter?
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they get to reduce your benefits WHILE you appeal? Or do they have to wait?

Also - they have access to take money OUT of any bank account they directly deposit money INTO (or any OTHER account you have at THAT bank).

So you might want to move any money you plan on trying to keep to ANOTHER bank.

Right now I am working on getting BACK the money they took out of MY account Two Months AFTER they put a transmittal through to Finance that was supposed to STOP the reclaimation - as I was entitled to my husband's last check as his surviving widow.

If they think you owe them money - it is best to have them bill you while you fight it out - rather than be in the position where they already HAVE your money (sucked right out of your bank account) while you fight to get it BACK.

It is all a matter of who gets to hold the money until somebody wins.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
After my hard work in compiling evidence, the VA reduced my PTSD from 100% to 70%. If that wasn't enough, they also proposed to reduce my migraines from 30% to 10%!!! What is really going on at my RO? What should I do from here on out? Could this be age discrimination? Have I unwittingly made an enemy within the RO?

I am faxing and mailing my TDIU form tomorrow, and submitting a hearing request for the migraine reduction. Also, they are leaving my back comp at 10%, which I believe should be at least 30% for all the dang narcotics they have me on.

Can I submit an NOD for the PTSD reduction while simultaneously filing for TDIU???

Please look up my other posts for background info, or I can look them up if need be. I really need help with this one. I am getting jacked.

Please see: Had My Hearing For Ptsd Proposal To Reduce

Thank you all.

It won't let me search for "Had My Hearing For Ptsd Proposal To Reduce." Would you please post? Thanks!

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your rebuttal was excellent- I am surprised they did this-

did they fully consider the issues you raised in the rebuttal?

As Rockhound asked- what was their reasons and bases for this?

As I understand it-they cannot reduce your comp durig the appeals period.

I agree with Rockhound too- send them the TDIU form-

tell them how your meds affect you and explain to them what you get the retirement and SSA for.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know that if you have been totally disabled for at least 5 years the ceiling for reducing you is much higher. If you are over 55 it is also higher. Finally, one thing to remember about the fishing trip and having fun. If you really did say this to a VA social worker that was a bad idea. You need a good IMO or medical opionion from your own doctor to counter this. It is not the end of the world because you will appeal it. The rules are that they must review and consider your entire file to determine to reduce a totally disabled vet. It cannot be based on a single exam. The VBM spells this out in detail. We both know they will do these things and just let you hang in the wind until you can overturn it. They could do this to all of us and then we would have to appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use