Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Turned Down Claim

Rate this question


68mustang

Question

Recently I put in a claim for hearing loss and vertigo. The VA denied the hearing loss, but has let the vertigo claim go forward. The reason the VA stated for denying the hearing loss claim was that last year I had put in a claim for hearing loss, which was denied and that I did not appeal the decision within the one year time limit. I did file a claim for tinnitus, and did not file a hearing loss claim. The tinnitus claim was approved and I received a 10% rating. The award letter states that my tinnitus claim was approved and nowhere in the letter does it state that a hearing loss claim was denied. The VA also states that in order for the hearing loss claim to continue, that I need to provide new evidence which has not been previously used.

The doctor's report that I sent in last year for the tinnitus claim stated the I had tinnitus and hearing loss due to acoustic trauma while in the military.

The doctor's report was used on the tinnitus claim, should that report be allowed to support my hearing loss claim since I had not previously file for hearing loss claim in last years original tinnitus claim?

Any input that you all might have would be appreciated. Thanks.

68mustang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The sole and only reason that the judicial system exists in this country is to interpret laws, NOT TO MAKE THE LAWS, but only to interpret the intentions of the legislature (supposedly the intentions of THE PEOPLE, but, in most instances, big business and special interests groups, but, nonetheless....).

Time, this decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is in open contravention of the Constitution of the United States of America and would NOT stand scrutiny of the Supreme Court, but, unfortunately, it'll be one or more of US veterans that will have to spend the remainder of his/her life in limbo while their single attorney, the only one that they could get to take their case, fights this decision in the Supreme Court of the United States, taking, on average these days, 6 years from filing to hearing date, IF and ONLY IF, the Supreme Court deems it in THEIR INTEREST to hear the case.

Being that the Court of Appeals has decided in the VA's favor, AGAIN, the GOOD recommendation that we should be giving out on this site when it comes to "should I claim more than ONE issue when I file?" is ABSOLUTELY NO!

and, again, as Pete and John and Rentaldude, et al, have repeatedly pointed out:

GET A COPY OF YOUR C-FILE, NOW, AND READ IT, AND READ IT, AND READ IT!

AND, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT IT, THEN ASK THEM.

AND, BE AWARE OF DATES, OR, IF NOT, YOU ARE, WELL, YOU ARE SCREWED, BY THE VERY INSTITUTION THAT WAS CREATED TO MAKE SURE YOU DIDN'T GET SCREWED! :lol:

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sole and only reason that the judicial system exists in this country is to interpret laws, NOT TO MAKE THE LAWS, but only to interpret the intentions of the legislature (supposedly the intentions of THE PEOPLE, but, in most instances, big business and special interests groups, but, nonetheless....).

Time, this decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is in open contravention of the Constitution of the United States of America and would NOT stand scrutiny of the Supreme Court, but, unfortunately, it'll be one or more of US veterans that will have to spend the remainder of his/her life in limbo while their single attorney, the only one that they could get to take their case, fights this decision in the Supreme Court of the United States, taking, on average these days, 6 years from filing to hearing date, IF and ONLY IF, the Supreme Court deems it in THEIR INTEREST to hear the case.

Being that the Court of Appeals has decided in the VA's favor, AGAIN, the GOOD recommendation that we should be giving out on this site when it comes to "should I claim more than ONE issue when I file?" is ABSOLUTELY NO!

and, again, as Pete and John and Rentaldude, et al, have repeatedly pointed out:

GET A COPY OF YOUR C-FILE, NOW, AND READ IT, AND READ IT, AND READ IT!

AND, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT IT, THEN ASK THEM.

AND, BE AWARE OF DATES, OR, IF NOT, YOU ARE, WELL, YOU ARE SCREWED, BY THE VERY INSTITUTION THAT WAS CREATED TO MAKE SURE YOU DIDN'T GET SCREWED! :lol:

Only Congress can change this now because there was not an appeal to the supreme court.

The story from VA Watchdog here: http://www.vawatchdog.org/nfDEC06/nf122406-4.htm

However, I agree with john999 that 68mustang should have gotten a VCAA letter if there was an infered claim so he could supply evidence in support of the claim. This would be his avenue to pursue. I don't see how the VA could infer and deny a claim without the veteran knowing there ever was a claim. That said, we know the VA is not above such tactics.

There is the chance that the RO is mistaken and there never was a claim, infered or otherwise, for hearing loss. It seems a good chance as the RO is not known for following the law and opening infered claims when they should. They did not open a claim for TBI in my case after I was diagnosed with inservice TBI by a C&P Doc. Instead they denied my MDD claim because the MDD was "caused by a head injury in service".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I say again that when you file multiple claims you need to get a VCAA letter that addresses all the claims. If you don't get that letter then you can almost rest assured that the claims that are not referenced in the VCAA letter are going nowhere, and may just die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i turned in a multi claim [14] at once because my poa said to do it as well as hadit members.i received a vcaa letter addressing all.but i had c and p exams for only 3. any input on this? i'm told my claims are at the rater...4 months now.

<b>for sale.....1 used veteran.slightly broken.

understands very little when it comes to regulations.

please be gentle.housebroken</b> <b>,growls

but does not bite</b>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have multiple claims at the ro does this mean , like if i file for an increase it is

denied and i file for arthritis it is automatically denied? i really do not under stand

this.

oh after reading it says if acts on one claim and doesnt act on others they are deemed denied,but dont they have to notify you?

Edited by skunk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i turned in a multi claim [14] at once because my poa said to do it as well as hadit members.i received a vcaa letter addressing all.but i had c and p exams for only 3. any input on this? i'm told my claims are at the rater...4 months now.

I think multiple claims are fine for those that know these VA dirty secrets. You just need to be on top of it when you get a decision, favorable or unfavorable, on any of them so that the rest do not get swept under the rug. If any claim is not mentioned in an award or denial letter, send in a quick NOD for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use