Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Went To Senators Office They Wrote A Letter

Rate this question


mrsvet28

Question

We are still at it -been helping MR. Vet recoop from his surgery-

Here is the latest letter as of May 08:

Senator Specter has expressed an interest in your appeal and will receive a copy of this letter.

This letter is in regard to your BVA remand of 4 issues of your appeal.In your inquiry to Senator Specters office your request to have an overdue DRO hearing for "nine issues which were reported in the SSOC dated Jan 08,08"/ Also you contend that you did not receive duty to assist in the presentation of your claims. / Further you contend that your compensation and pension examinations were deficient./ Finally you contend that errors were committed during the processing of your claims.

Please be advised that your appeal was remanded by the BVA on Jan 07,09 for the following issues:entitlement to service connection for PTSD-hypertension-left leg disorder-total disability rating based upon individual unemployability.

Per instructions of the BVA remand the RegionalOffice is to schedule you for a VA psychiatric exam,with request for an opinion, for the issue of PTSD,and to schedule you for a VA exam with request for an opinion for the issue of your left leg disorder.

Also, in their decision dated Jan7,09 the BVA made the following five determinations:new and material evidence was not received to reopen the claim for entitlement to service connection for hearing loss, left knee disorder,subcutaneous lumps to the left shoulder,left buttock,and middle back,service connection for chronic prostatis is denied and urinary disorder is denied .The decision of the BVA may be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims within 120 days from the date of the BVA decision. As the 120 day period has expired and you have not indicated that you have submitted an appeal with the USCAVC, we will accept your inquiry to Senator Specters as a claim to reopen any claim that the Board denied in its decision dated Jan 07,09 Specifically you will be advised in a seperate letter regarding the following five claims:whether new and material evidence adequate to reopen the claim for service connection for hearing loss has been received,left knee disorder,lumps to left shoulder,buttock and middle back,urinary disorder and chronic prostatis

Please be advised that your claim folder must be protected for a period of 150 days. The 150 day period following a BVA decision is considered a "special handling period" for the transfers of any claims folders that are subject to review by the US CAVC During this time period the claims folder may not be transferred to the VAMC Because the Board has requested a review of your claim folder at the time of your scheduled examination,your examination will be scheduled upon expiration of the special handling period.

Concerning your request for a DRO hearing please be advised that you were afforded a DRO hearing via videoconference at Wilkes Barre PA on Feb 12. 08.We can not accomodate you with another DRO hearing regarding the exact same claims for which you were previously afforded a DRO hearing. a BVA hearing or for which a BVA decision has been rendered. Finally regarding your request to have your VA exams scheduled after 4/27/09 please be advised no exams will be scheduled until July 09.

SO question #!: how can they say that the Board requested a review of folder at the same time of the scheduled exam- which was when?? and then retracted and said-no exams until July (besides the 150 day "special handling clause)

#2- When they sent the VCAA notice we had 30 days to submit already did that sent everything back in- But when I looked up the 150 day period Public Law-they arent allowed to add anything new to the c file--before the 150 day period expires(which I never heard of until now-)

#3- we already now that we have had hearings and that wasnt even a question from us-#4-why would they take the Senators inquiry to reopen another claim for all the issues theyve denied when we never said that is what we wanted to do

#5-the only thing we were trying to find out was when did they plan on doing the CP exams that the BVA requested-when I called the 215 Philly number-I was told A>that he may or may not need the CP exams at all-B>the c file was in Philly already-but yet the 150 days are not up-

So the convalucense just keeps going and going and going...............expeditiously, my **s!! Anybody who can explain this???? Thanks Mrs Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have deep suspicion of political critters actually doing anything for vets. Maybe Spector is different since he wants to curry favor after jumping ship from one party to another. Usually these guys are useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have deep suspicion of political critters actually doing anything for vets. Maybe Spector is different since he wants to curry favor after jumping ship from one party to another. Usually these guys are useless.

So technically they took the Sentor inquiry and took it upon themselves (the VSCM) to reopen everything that we already dropped and we are waiting as the BVA requested, expeditiously (which means crapola)another PTSD_CP exam so now we have a new claim that we never reopened they did yadayada idiots!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Chaos is the term I see here. Well orchestrated chaos.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe James, James Bond can help. The VA may be a over selous fan and thinks that your Senator works for SPECTER and not that his name is Specter. LOL :huh: LOL :lol: LOL :lol:

Sorry, but I find with out some humor, dealing with the VARO can be as difficult as trying to decifer some coded message. As we all know, it's deny and delay as long as possible, hoping we will go away or die.

Rockhound Rider ;)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

This is the way the VA's "dances" around the issues. This letter was meant to confuse and to delay. You see, it is in the Va's best interest to delay your claim as long as possible because:

1. Employees get paid bonusess for delaying your claim. Source: http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/nf09/nfmay09/nf052309-1.htm

2. The Va wont pay anything if they delay your claim long enough because when you die, so does your claim.

3. The VA hopes you "give up" (abandon) your claim and you get nothing.

4. Even if the Veteran does not give up, and does not die, and the Veteran "wins" the claim, the Veteran still looses because the VA gets an interest free loan from the Veteran for all the years the Veterans claim is in "processing", as no interest is ever paid on delayed Veterans claims. However, the Veteran must pay interest on unpaid copays or VA loans, however, during this same time. In other words, the VA borrows the Veterans money, then "lends" it back to him and charges him interest on VA loans, student loans, and medical co pays. Its a giant ripoff to Veterans.

5. End Result: The VA delays Veterans claims to save money at Veterans expense. So VA goes to great efforts to delay Veterans claims as long as possible as it is profitable for them to do so. As long as the above "financial incentives" remain in place to delay Veterans claims, the claims backlog will continue to grow, and it will take longer and longer to "process" Veterans claims, as there is simply no incentive for the Va to quickly process Veterans claims.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use